Psychoanalysis In The Professional Schools By Gary Walls: Article Analysis

Improved Essays
The article Meaning or Medicine: The Future of Psychoanalysis in the Professional Schools by Gary Walls, addressed the decreased presences of psychoanalysis in predoctoral education. The author defined psychoanalysis as a theory that elucidates issues by using human meaning. Wall’s relied heavily on the American Psychological Association (APA) promotion of “evidence-based treatment” and the commitment to the medical model as the rationale of the decreased psychoanalysis presence in predoctoral education. Several other key areas of obscurity concerning APA’s actions were highlighted to further explain the cause of the decrease presence of psychoanalysis. The author acknowledged that not all schools had decreased psychoanalysis presence. Due …show more content…
First, the author did not provide an extensive support for his claims. Whenever a claim is made, there should always be an extensive amount of citations in the article to support the claim. The author should have expected readers to thoroughly critique his article, due to the serious claim made against APA. The author should have added more traditional research about APA’s action instead of just listing them. The lack in the quality and quantity of evidence detracts the educated reader from his thesis. Second, the author seemed to be an advocate for the psychanalysis practice. The author strong opinion about the psychoanalysis practice conjure questions about the reliability of the article. Thirdly, the author did not propose a specific solution to the issue of decreased presence in psychoanalysis. If an article addresses an issue it should also propose a specific solution. Walls did not do that, he only indicated that it is up to the schools to make a difference in the decrease presence of psychoanalysis. Overall the author did address his issue. The lack of support for his claims, only discussing one side of an argument and lack of a specific proposed solution all serve as a threat to the reliability and validity of the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    He does not argue that torture should be used casually, rather his argument stems from the premise that nations should not be so quick to ban torture in every single circumstance. His primary rhetorical strategy is to use hypothetical extremes to prove his point, in addition, he also appeals to emotion to evoke a sense towards Utilitarianism to justify torture in certain cases. His primary downfall in his argument was that many of his hypothetical have yet to be seen in real life, in light of this, it may delegitimize his argument in certain people’s…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This organizational mistake unfortunately confuses his intended message. Throughout the paper, while seeing notable attempts at providing backing and impressive diction, it is not evident what Zimmerman is trying to claim. It isn’t until the final paragraph that an explicit claim is written. Having to try to discern whether he is pro or anti sex education distracts from his intended message of the paper. Zimmerman didn’t write this essay to conclude the appropriateness of sex education.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sexuality In Workplace

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Moreover, as Fleming himself says the study was not designed to investigate sexuality but organizational culture and, therefore, does not contain an actual insight to his argument. The paper finalizes with a small conclusion that lacks an actual content or relevance to Fleming 's arguments. Overall, the layout of the paper was vexing and ineffective in reaching evidence for Fleming 's arguments, as we believe he needed more examples to support his…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Everything Burns: the psychology and philosophy of the Joker, author Anthony Nowicke makes an unsuccessful attempt to convince the audience that the Joker’s appeal is due to human’s instinctive desire to rebel. Nowicke uses a majority of lower level vocabulary and only circles around his main point of existentialism. By failing to establish ethos, spending more time explaining existentialism rather than providing extrinsic proofs, and losing focus Nowicke fails to rhetorically persuading his audience. In the article Nowicke jumps straight to the point, normally this would be of great relief, however, at no time does he mention any of his sources or if he did any research. By expecting the audience to trust him, his lack of ethos in his article leaves doubt in the mind of his reader making them ask “okay, why should we trust you?”.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Even the revised conception of Derridean reading is unacceptably limiting and chains the reader to the intended meaning of the words. Truth that the author did not intend or realize was present in a particular work therefore becomes restricted when readers are chained to a single, or in some cases a few, possible understandings and interpretations. Reply 2: Creativity and imaginativeness, while generally desirable, do not serve the function of finding truth particularly in nonfiction literature as much as the Lockean virtues do. When reading any scientific article, creatively inventing worlds curbs the reader’s ability to draw knowledge by ignoring the reliability of the scientific method. Regarding works of fiction, a revised Derridean reading does not have to limit creativity, imagination, and freedom.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is shown because the Oedipus case study only explains meanings about itself. In addition, the case of Anna O by Freud and Breuer ( ) fails to meet the criteria of science because it cannot be tested. testability. However, Hinshelwood (2010) points out that single cases studies can be tested. Some academics argue that psychoanalysis is not a science because it cannot be falsified.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Mill rejects paternalism, he does say that the “only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm [or a definite risk of harm] to others” whether it be physical violence or mental (Mill, p. 10). Therefore, a school such as SVSU with a enhanced focus and outreach towards diversity as well as students of numerous races on campus, must deny Spencer’s speech in order to prevent harm. Especially, when Spencer’s speeches come with a “definite risk of harm” as seen in multiple occasions. Mill himself believes that the only time to allow such paternalism would be to prevent harm and Spencer’s movement has already proven harmful to different racial…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Scientist disprove the validity of psychoanalysis because it lacks empirical data, and heavily depends on clinical data as its main form of evidence. Many psychologist still believe in psychoanalysis and apply psychoanalytic principles to their therapeutic practice. Some believe in the influence…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They believe that the sole source of knowledge is the revelation and that any reference in other knowledge acquisition efforts is invalid. The two professors believe that psychotherapy is just a substitute to the conversion undertakings of the Holy Spirit. The fact that the writers show lots of opposition to any other scientific definitions to knowledge acquisition indicates that they are using the ‘Against’ model in their descriptions (Martin, 2013 p.5). The professor’s sum up their expositions in several points such that they out rightly reject psychology. They perceive the conflict between the two concepts as inherent and without a solution.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He then follows those statements by voicing that both sides do have understandable points, but adds that experimenting with different solutions will offer “better answers” (2014, p. 3, para. 16) to boys’ suspected behavioral pattern. Leonhardt takes no stance upon which solution would best cure these supposed behavioral issues, so why would he include it in his writing? The main issue within this point in the article is the tone at which he has about the position, stating these solutions as if his argument is a fact instead of a controversial topic. This inclusion is not standard and allows the reader to believe that Leonhardt is not as credible as he is implementing.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays