In the court case Mclean vs. Arkansas on the creationism trial, Laudon “argues that the court decision was correct, but for the wrong reasons. He suggests that instead of showing that creation-science is not scientific (due to being untestable, etc.).” Laudon says the first two properties it must be guided by law; it must be explanatory reference by natural law can be explained he gives an example of world flood (P&R. p.342) cannot be explained by the law of science. Laudon stated that creation since has been tested previously and it was proven incorrect. Laudon believes judge Overton was wrong claiming creationism is unfalsifiable instead he should’ve said creationism is falsifiable because it claims the age of the earth, geological origin,
