Mauchly's Test Of Sphericityb Analysis

Great Essays
Register to read the introduction… chi-square df Sig. Epsilon a Greenhouse-Geisser Huynh-Feldt Factor 0.049 966.660 35 0.000 0.682 0.695

Lower-bound 0.125

Notes: Test the null hypothesis that the error covariance matrix of the orthonormalized transformed dependent variables is proportional to an identity matrix. a May be used to adjust the degrees of freedom for the averaged tests of significance. b Design: Intercept Within Subjects Design: factor.

Performance criteria
Table A2 Bonferroni test on rating of performance criteria (pairwise comparisons) (I) factor (J) factor Mean difference (I – J) Std. error Sig. a 391

95% confidence interval for differencea Lower bound Upper bound 0.033 0.474 0.507 0.227 0.243 0.219 0.583 0.441 0.534 0.576 0.281 0.300 0.278 0.661 0.502 0.206 −0.070 −0.052 −0.073 0.279 0.140 −0.146 −0.125 −0.145 0.198 0.069 0.073 0.061 0.481 0.337 0.020 0.470 0.330 0.498 0.355
…show more content…
1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 8 9 9

−0.074 0.312* 0.364* 0.086 0.102 0.077 0.429* 0.293* 0.386* 0.438* 0.160* 0.176* 0.151* 0.503* 0.367* 0.052 −0.225* −0.210* −0.235* 0.117 −0.019 −0.278* −0.262* −0.287* 0.065 −0.071 0.015 −0.009 0.343* 0.207* −0.025 0.327* 0.191* 0.352* 0.216* −0.136*

0.033 0.050 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.048 0.046 0.046 0.043 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.049 0.042 0.048 0.048 0.049 0.050 0.050 0.049 0.041 0.042 0.044 0.041 0.043 0.018 0.022 0.043 0.040 0.014 0.044 0.043 0.045 0.043 0.038

0.969 0.000 0.000 10.000 0.731 10.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.005 0.000 0.000 10.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.705 10.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.017

−0.182 0.150 0.221 −0.054 −0.039 −0.065 0.275 0.145 0.238 0.300 0.040 0.052 0.025 0.345 0.232 −0.101 −0.381 −0.368 −0.396 −0.044 −0.177 −0.410 −0.399 −0.430 −0.069 −0.211 −0.042 −0.079 0.204 0.076 −0.069 0.184 0.053 0.206 0.077

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    *If we look at the significance in this table for all variable is .000. This is very important and it means statistically significant factors in our model.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Specialty Toys Essay

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1 - 0.95 = 0.05 >>>>> 0.05/2 = 0.025. this applies to left and right sides of the area.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    where they used confirmatory factor analysis. The process of this method of validity measurement is simpler as it…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Xacc/280 Week 6 Checkpoint

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The last significant digit is the rounded digit and its value (rounded up or down) is determined by the following digit. A digit rounds up for numbers 5-9 and down for 0-4. [Note: Silverberg has more complicated rules for rounding when the next-place digit is a 5, but in this course we are using the aforementioned system.] For example 4.589 to three significant figures rounds to 4.59, where 4.581 to three significant figures rounds to 4.58.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 4 Assignment

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Five frequency (f) tables will be constructed for univariate analysis. Standard deviation (SD) will be calculated for treatment outcomes. The standard deviation will allow the researcher to examine how much the individual values of the tables differ from the mean and other values (Royse, 2010). Percentage (%) will be calculated for all nominal variables to help visual the data through historgrams. Mean (M) will be calculated for age and education level which will help determine the average of each nominal variable. Mode will be calculated for age, education level, ethnicity and referral source. From the frequency (f) distribution table and data table, bar charts and pie graphs will be generated to help visual the…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The results of my Margin Error is 20.89. The 95% Confidence Interval is 102.71%- 60.92%.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 6 Paper

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    14) The standard deviation was 8.33. This means that the foundations had a miss of the mean by approximately $8.33. Most foundations were either below or above $14.82 by about…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Nobel Case Study

    • 2499 Words
    • 10 Pages

    b15 . O5 + b16 . O6 + b17 . O7 + b18 . O8 + b19 . O9 + b20 . O10 + b21 . O11 + b22 . O12…

    • 2499 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Essay

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The leftmost zeros that appear in front of non-zero numbers are not considered significant, instead they act as placeholders. Writing the measurements…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lab 4.3 Lab

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After that we did the average of our group and another group. For the tabletop 1 block was .55 newtons, 2 was 1.1 newtons, 3 was 1.541666666666 newtons, 2.13333333 newtons. Wax paper was .5083333333 newtons, 2 was 1.066666 newtons, 3 was 1.325 newtons, 4 was 1.708333333 newtons. Paper towel was .725 newtons, 2 was 1.225 newtons, 3 was 1.50833333 newtons, 4 was 2.066666 newtons. Fine sandpaper was 1.2083333 newtons, 2 was 2.975 newtons, 3 was 3.89166666 newtons, 4 was 5.15 newtons. Coarse sandpaper was 1.26666 newtons, 2 was 2.666666 newtons, 3 was 4.24166666 newtons, 4 was 5.9833333 newtons. Then I made a bar graph about the difference in newtons between the tabletop averages and coarse sandpaper.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    List the probability value for each possibility in the binomial experiment that was calculated in MINITAB with the probability of a success being ½. (Complete sentence not necessary)…

    • 2523 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Appraisal Essay

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages

    2014). Data analysis performed by comparing the participant mean scores from the NEO™-PI-3 against the established population norms with the use of a sample t-test. The authors were unable to perform a gender comparison due to the small proportion of males within the group of participants.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lens Equation Analysis

    • 1124 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This value was 0.67 error bars away from the estimated value of (19.5 ± 0.5) cm. Another result that can be obtained from the graph is the gradient. The expected gradient was -1 as can be seen in the above picture the gradient from the results was (-1.01 ± 0.02). This shows that the experiment is valid and performed accurately.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    dbh=0.070203x500-3.9176=31.1839 which is right in the middle of the data points of the DBH values.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    All the data obtained from this experiment is plotted on the graph. The accuracy and precision can be determined from the graph. Based on the graph , as the line do not pass the origin , it can be deducted that the result is fairly accurate. Since there are few outliers on the graph , the precision of this graph is moderate. Accuracy of the graph is affected by systematic errors while the precision is affected by random errors.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays