Matthew Donnelly: The Life And Death Of An Assisted Suicide

Improved Essays
Physician—assisted suicide is when a physician provides a prescription for a lethal dose of medicine to a terminally ill patient upon their request. (http://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/pad.html). It all started in 1906, when Ohio drafted a euthanasia bill, but failed. Since then Oregon, Vermont, New Mexico, and Washington have made it legal, and set protocol that allows terminally ill patients to choose when they die. Oregon’s law requires the patient to be at least 18 years old, a resident of Oregon, have a terminal condition with six months to live, and must be able to make the health care decision for themselves (http://public.health.oregon.gov/ProviderPartnerResources/EvaluationResearch/DeathwithDignityAct/Documents/faqs.pdf). Montana …show more content…
Little did he know that after 30 years of his beloved career would cause him to lose his jaw, nose, lips, eyes, left hand, and two fingers on his right hand. Donnelly’s skin cancer had taken over his entire life; he was designated to his hospital bed hunched over, teeth clenched, rocking back and forth-in pain. His brother Harold could not stand to his brother in pain anymore, so he went home grabbed a .30 caliber, and returned to the hospital to kill Donnelly. Harold was later tried for murder. (http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/iie/v1n1/suicide.html)
Due to physician—assisted suicide not being legal in their state, Donnelly had to live his last year in unimaginable pain. So, Harold did what was best for his brother, and took away the pain by shooting him. It is fair that Harold was tried for murder because murder is illegal, but he would not have had to kill his brother if the law was passed. This is a perfect example of why terminally ill patients should have the right to choose their own death. Donnelly’s illness was out of his control. To live the rest of his life in a profound amount of pain, with no relief is
…show more content…
If all the pros and cons are taken into consideration there could be criteria and requirements so no mistakes are made. Requirements such as only terminally ill patient’s, who were given a certain amount of time to live, can only have this option. No one with mental disorders, or depression can get this option due to the fact there is no disease that is killing them; it is themselves. They do not have a deadline to their life, but terminally ill patients do. Next is when being diagnosed, the patient needs to go for a second opinion. If a second opinion is given it ensures that the patient was not misdiagnosed the first time, it would avoid any wrongful assisted suicide. Another requirement is get them evaluated by a psychiatrist to make sure they are mentally stable enough to make such a drastic decision. Also, the family cannot influence the doctors or patient unless the patient is in an incoherent state and cannot make a decision themselves. For example, if the patient is in a comma and there is no chance of them coming out, the family can make the decision. Other than that, the decision between life and death is up to the patient as long as they meet the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS), has been a moral dilemma in the hot seat since the passing of Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act in 1997. All throughout the US, states have been trying to pass acts that allow people to die with dignity using PAS, the most recent being Colorado. PAS is a conflicting topic because it causes concern if the choice is morally ethical for the patient and for the others making these decisions like, doctors, psychologist, and other family members. PAS can cause conflict among religion and personal beliefs but it should be seen as an individual 's right not a communal right. The article referenced within this paper is “The Role of and Challenge for Psychologist in Physician Assisted Suicide” written by Shara M. Johnson,…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the first things to examine are the laws in place in the specific state regarding assisted suicide. Many states have passed legislation allowing forms of assisted suicide. These laws vary from state to state. Typically, the state allows a physician to prescribe a lethal dose of medication, but the patient must be able to administer the dose themselves. Consequently, the person has chosen to commit suicide and no…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In every state in America except Oregon and California, it is permissible to withhold treatment and let a patient die, but impermissible for a physician to take direct action to assist the patient in ending their life. Both scenarios involve a patient dying, and highlight the difference between letting a patient die and killing them. Either way, the patient is giving up all hope of a cure, medical breakthrough, miracle, or even an extended life. Dan Callahan, an advocate of keeping physician suicide illegal, highlights the metaphysical, moral, and historical arguments against physician assisted suicide that violate the integrity of the medical profession by intentionally killing. The US courts have already set precedents against physician assisted suicide, as there is no fundamental liberty interest in legalizing assisted suicide.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Other factors include the desire to preserve dignity and personhood in the dying process and opposition to prolonging life by using sophisticated medical technology when it is recognized that care is futile. Closely related to self-determination is the principle of autonomy. This principle states that persons should have the right to make their own decisions about the course of their own lives whenever they can. By extension, they should also have the right to determine the course of their own dying as much as possible. The ethics of physician assisted suicide (PAS) continue to be debated.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine the case of a terminally ill cancer patient given six months to live. This patient may be in great pain and may be just tired of constant treatments. They decide that they are ready to end the suffering. What they may not know is that due to the need to constantly expand our understanding of the human anatomy we’ve developed a cure to cancer three months after they used the PAS method. This goes straight back to the ethical side of this argument, is it really okay for someone to be in severe pain for 3 more months and still not make it?…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States, the controversial topic of physician assisted suicide has been heavily debated. Should it be legal to terminate one’s own life, with the aid of a physician, because they have been afflicted by a terminal illness? One should have the option to not suffer months of agonizing pain, but leave their life with dignity. The only states that legally allow a person of a terminal illness to have a physician assisted death are Oregon, Vermont and Washington. If passed, the End of Life Option Act, modeled after the Death with Dignity Act of Oregon, would give the people of California who have been deemed terminally ill the right to a physician assisted death.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Physicians-Assisted Suicide be allowed in the United States? Many patients and doctors around the country have debated the right for physicians to assist in patient suicide. Doctors should be allowed to assist in the suicide of terminally ill patients who are suffering and are going to die regardless of the time they have left. Patients should be allowed the right to choose to live or die when cancer or some genetic disease has taken over their body.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the word suicide is used, most people think of the gruesome gun to the head or overdose on medication. Everyone is quick to assume an act of suicide is somebody doing harm to his or herself. Not many people think of suicide as being something that a physician would help assist with, but it has definitely become a controversy over the years. Physician-assisted suicide is when a physician receives consent from a terminally ill patient to administer drugs that will eventually kill them. Before this may happen, there are a number of events that have to happen first.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ryan T. Anderson's article titled “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong” begins with Anderson setting the stage of the idea of Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) being introduced with stories of patients diagnosed with terrible diseases. Anderson describes the act of eighteen states considering legalizing PAS a “grave mistake”, and describes a more merciful alternative of doctors giving patients the means to ease their pain as they await their demise. Anderson also quotes Victoria Reggie Kennedy, who believes that most people would prefer a death surrounded by loved ones, and a PAS would be cold, unloving and extreme. Anderson also claims that this would be contrary to the Hippocratic Oath and that nobody should be legally allowed to kill…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide When you hear the words physician assisted suicide, it may sound a little confusing. Physicians are supposed to keep you alive as long as the possibly can, right? Physician assisted suicide refers to a practice in which a physician provides a competent, terminally ill patient with a prescription for a lethal dose of medication upon the patient's request (Starks, Dudzinski,& White). Which basically means that a doctor gives you medicine upon your request that will kill you. A person cannot just ask at anytime to be given the medicine, you must be terminally ill and also conscious.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dying topic, the decision that families or designated surrogates are left to make when a loved one is in a vegetative state and is being kept alive on life support. This decision is made after considering discussions with the attending physician, priest, and family or friend. There is also the consideration of a physician-assisted suicide, which provides a mean for the terminally ill patients to take their own life. Some may argue this physician-assisted suicide is a form of killing and is wrong in the eyes of many people, (Kaebnick, G. 2017). Physician-assisted suicide is legal in some state such as Oregon and Washington.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Of course then people will bring up the prevention of suicide. The patient can be given more medication, or maybe they will make a miraculous recovery. Although this sounds like a perfect solution, it is not achievable ("Can Suicide"). So considering other courses of action tend to lead to far more painful or drawn out deaths, euthanasia is the optimal…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although more than half of the United States does not believe in legalizing physician-assisted suicide, five states have already legalized this assistance, which is causing a huge ethical debate in the medical world (“State-by-State Guide to Physician-Assisted Suicide,” n.d.). People who are in favor of physician-assisted suicide are arguing for the respect of autonomy, individual liberty, and compassion. In contrast, people who are not in favor of physician-assisted suicide are arguing for the sanctity of life, fear of abuse, and professional integrity. Physician assisted suicide should be considered unethical in healthcare because of the potential for abuse and the duty of a healthcare provider is to do no harm and maintain life. The principle of non-maleficence and the theory of deontology support my argument against physician-assisted suicide by providing evidence on why it should be considered unethical.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ability to die is inherited by all people at the moment of conception but the legal right to die is a topic most concerning in today’s politics. Andrew D. Sumner, a graduate a Penn State’s College of Medicine in 1990, proposes that individuals should not have the legal right to end their life due to terminal illness or ailment. Approximately 1.2% of American citizens die every year from some form of terminal illness(Guy, Maytal, and Theodore A. Stern 6). Many of those deaths involve excruciating pain from the illness itself and family members suffering over an hourglass that just won 't seem to run out. Denying people the right to chose when they want to pass on their own terms is simply cruel and unjust, not only to the patient, but to the loved ones of the individual.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine if you were lying in a hospital bed and you and your loved ones are being informed that your life has taken a turn for the worse, which has impacted your quality of life forever by having a terminal illness. Are you willing to make a decision to take the easy way out? What would your choice be? Do we truly have the right to cross the fine lines of life and death? Do you think we have the right to decide who gets to live and who doesn’t?…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays