Matter Of The Petition Of Nerac Case Analysis

Improved Essays
As stated in Matter of the Petition of Nerac, Inc. (N.Y. Div. Tax App., DLJ. Dkt. Nos. 822568 and 822651, 7/15/2010), Nerac was a research and advisory firm which provides technical, scientific, and engineering research to its clients. Nerac employed scientists, engineers, and other professionals with the most relevant experience and expertise to address clients’ specific questions and to hone the characteristics of the client’s problem and develop a search strategy. The analyst identified the most helpful databases and other information resources—both public domain databases and proprietary databases—and then implemented the specialized research strategy to answer the client’s question. The analyst ultimately provided the client with a unique

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nonemacher Case Summary

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On Wednesday at 12:03 AM Resident Director Brandon Winslow received a phone call from Resident Assistant Christian San Pedro regarding a resident of concern. Resident Maryssa Hodder and Resident Marena Horan came to Resident Assistant Kayli Boyes with concerns on the whereabouts of Resident Falon Nonemacher who also resides in McHale 327. Resident Nonemacher was not answering phone calls from both Resident Hodder and Horan. RD Winslow was informed that Resident Nonemacher left to go home on Tuesday October 3rd around 1:00AM. Then returned for class later around 9:00AM on Tuesday.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Korematsu v. United States (check) (signifigant) Do the President and Congress have the power to excluded United States Citizens of Japanese’s descents without violating the Fifth Amendment, Due Process Clause, and the Fourteenth Amendment, Equal Protection Clause? After the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor in 1942, The American Military became concerned about the Security of the United States. With General DeWitt’s recommendation, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Executive order 9066, “authorizing the removal of any or all people from military areas, as deemed necessary or desirable”. After this order was passed Fred Korematsu, an American born citizen of Japanese decent, had some facial surgery, changed his names and claimed to be…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987) Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Shapira v. Union National Bank Citation: 39 Ohio Misc. 28, 315 N.E.2d 825 (Com. Pl. 1974) Facts: David Shapira died and left a will and three children.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    NEPTA Case Study

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Does the Queens Supreme Court lack personal jurisdiction over NEPTA? More specifically, Can the Queens Supreme court exercise under New York state law it’s long-arm statute to gain personal jurisdiction over NEPTA, a non-resident, for their alleged cause of injury of Taneka due to their alleged negligence? According to Section 302 of New York Consolidated Laws, Civil Practice Law, and Rules (CPLR 302), if NEPTA “transacts any business within the state” the New York court long-arm statute can be applied. Additionally, personal jurisdiction for New York over the case can be applied if NEPTA “contracts anywhere to supply goods or services in the state” of New York.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case being addressed in this essay is: Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G. The topics being addressed in this essay will be provided through a summary and an analysis, explaining the case through legal liberalism and feminist legal theory in relation to the majority decision and the dissenting decision. I personally, agree with the reasoning of the majority decision and will prove why. Summary…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R. V. Mabior Case Study

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    FIDO FACTS In Winnipeg, Manitoba, Clato Lual Mabior did not disclose to his partners that he was HIV positive. This occurred between 2004 and 2005. (CBC News, 2014) He was taken to court by nine complainants.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Essay

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Title and Citation: Fry V. Napoleon Community School District Topic: A school district denying the student the right to have a service dog attend school. Level or Type of Court: Supreme Court- Oct 2016 Facts of the Case: A student with cerebral palsy obtained a service dog with the doctor’s approval to help her live as independent as possible. The service dog was hypo-allergenic and was to stay out of the way when not needed.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    La Alianza Case Summary

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of this case policy analysis is to identify the absence of actions that could have been taken by the Department of Social Services and La Alianza that contributed to the outcomes of the children reported in the case study High Stakes and Frightening Lapses. Additionally, the recommended stance of the Commissioner of DSS at the end of the case study will be to implement new contracts with nonprofit agencies while increasing communication between the agencies to prevent additional neglect of the children to occur. The deontological perspective will support the need to provide required services regardless of the situational factors due to a moral obligation. Case Policy Analysis & Recommendation In the analysis of the Department…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Gonzales Case Study

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    R v. Gonzales refers to a criminal case of a triple parricide by twenty year old Australian BOS: 28744455 Sef Gonzales which occurred on the 10th of July 2001. Sef’s motives for killing his father Teddy, Mother Mary Loiva and sister Clodine derived from his parent’s unattainable high expectations of him and his desire to financially benefit from their death. Having premeditated his crime, Sef entered Clodine’s room at 4pm armed with two kitchen knifes and a baseball bat and killed her. The cause of her death was the combined effect of the compression of her neck, the blunt force injuries and abdominal stab wounds. Sef’s mother arrived home an hour later and was ambushed in the living room by Sef, stabbing her multiple times, severing her windpipe.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sherbert v. Verner Sherbert v. Verner, was argued on April 24, 1963, and the Supreme Court, in a 7-2 ruling, reversed the opinion of the lower court that had denied the appellant, Adeil Sherbert, unemployment benefits, on June 17, 1963. The appellant had been a Seventh Day Adventist from South Carolina whose religious practices prevented her from working on Saturdays. Her inability to work Saturdays caused her to be fired when her former workplace took up a six-day workweek, and subsequently, no other jobs would hire her for the same reason. Although Sherbert tried to obtain unemployment insurance, the South Carolina government denied her claim, stating that benefits were unavailable to people whom potentially had employment available to…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in Canada, the final court of appeal, and the last legal resort for all litigants; therefore, the Supreme Court of Canada decisions are the ultimate expression and application of Canadian law (Supreme Court of Canada tour). The landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in the R v. Keegstra case regarding the freedom of expression portrays the theoretical concepts behind the court’s ruling as it is the job of the court to deliver a fair decision to the parties involved, as well as a decision that maintains law and order in society. The R v. Keegstra ruling contains insights from the consensus theory and the labelling theory, as the decision of the court was in the interest of the public. To better understand a criminal law case and come up with a conclusion, the theory used must have a valid structure and must follow the rules of critical thinking and logic (Boyd, Cartwright and Heidt, 2015: 120). Also, the purpose of the criminal law must be understood as criminal law serves a purpose, which takes into account some theoretical aspects of the consensus theory and…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Paper

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thesis This paper will discuss the cases of: Weeks v United States, Mapp v Ohio, Gideon v Wainwright and Scott v Harris. This paper will discuss which of these cases was the most important and it has impacted the criminal justice system. Each of these four Cases answered questions that influenced the criminal justice system to a whole new level.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The policy (or main issue beyond addressing secondary issues such as right to amend a complaint etc.) at issue in the cases of Tenuto v. Lederle (1997) , Safer v. Estate of Pack (1996) , and Molloy v. Meier (2006) is at which length do physicians have to notifying family (hereditary offspring), close associates, or those in contact with a patient of disease transmission; either through genetic heredity or by contact with a communicable pathogen. In all three cases, the policy is consistent as the three cases all dealt with a physician’s duty to warn others beyond the patient themselves- even if it seemed to violate the privacy rules normally expected in a physician-patient relationship.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to answer the case study questions and discuss the legal and ethical issues found in the case study Nepa vs. Commonwealth Department of Public Welfare. The case reveals elderly abuse by residents who endured abuse and neglect at the hands of the person charged with caring for them. It reviews the court’s findings of the petitioner’s appeal of the court’s judgment to revoke his license. This case study exemplifies types of patient and elderly abuse and patient rights violations which victims are often reluctant to report. “Patient abuse refers to the mistreatment or neglect of individuals in the health care setting” (Pozgar,2016, p. 418).…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays