Materialology Vs Non Materialism

Improved Essays
1. Materialists have an ontological claim that everything that exists is made of matter. Therefore, having mental states does not indicate that there is something mental; to deny materialism is to say that there exist non-material entities. One way to deny materialism is to say that mind (or ideas/beliefs) are non-material entities.
2. Functionalism claims that mental contents are functional. The negation of it is to say that mental states are defined introspectively instead of causally/functionally. o NOTE1: Ontology is supposed to be neutral between materialism and non-materialism. Non-material ontology can say that some non-material entities exist (Or mental things exist, which is non-material). o NOTE2: It is important to notice the
…show more content…
Whether intentional sentences about mental states are reducible to extensional sentences about brain is a semantic issue about language. We have a reductive thesis and a non-reductive thesis. Whether mentalistic language for psychology can be reduced to the scientific language of neuroscience is another way to describe the issue. o NOTE1: The semantic issue has noting to do with ontology but is the relation between intensional and extensional sentences. o NOTE2: One can be a non-reductionist and believe that intensional mentalistic language cannot be reduce to extensional language, and still be a materialist and a functionalist. Likewise, one can be a reductionist, and still be an introspectivist and a dualist.
6. Whether mental events can be explained in terms of brain events is an explanatory issue; saying something can or cannot be explained is different from saying sentences can or cannot be reduced. Someone who thinks that psychological language cannot be reduced to objective language of science may also hold that mental states can be explained in neurological terms; likewise, one can believe that psychological language can be reduced to physical language, but still cannot explain mental states in physical terms.
7. Nagel’s Argument:
1) There are subjective

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Examining a functionalism point of view would be looking at patterns of society on macro level. A good way to think of functionalism is like a body…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analyzing “Brainology” In the following essay, we will analyze and discuss the article “Brainology” by Carol Dweck. Starting off by the title, the opening paragraphs, the claim, the author’s purpose, methods, persona and closing paragraphs as well. Because I believe Dweck’s article was more effective than ineffective, reasons of why I believe she could've done a better work will be discussed and explained in short. The title the author chooses for this article, “ Brainology”, introduces the audience to what she will be talking about, it is important to point out that the word “brainology’ induces us to think of a very broad topic which could be understood as a study of the brain.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay Of Supervenience

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Even though the completeness of physics provides strong support for physicalism, in the case of the mind this does not necessarily mean that mental properties must be reduced to physical ones, only that the ‘mental’ must depend upon the physical base – the brain. Papineau’s claim that the “the mental is ontologically inseparable from the physical” (Papineau, 1993, p. 23) does not necessarily mean that the mental can be reduced to the physical. But if mind properties are still a particular kind of physical properties, how then are mental and physical properties related? Note that the question is in terms of relations, not in terms of realization or implementation; the later will be discussed shortly.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This belief the mind and the brain are related to each other as two distinct sorts of properties. The mind is believed to emerges from the brain but it is not dependent upon it. One could visualize this ideology as the brain as a snow cloud and the mind the unique, independent snowflakes that fall from it. The mind is seen as something spiritual and the body is physical. Since the mind comes from the brain; the brain contains both physical and spiritual properties (Mohn, 2017).…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualism Vs Physicalism

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view of physicalism gives a stronger and more plausible answer to the mind-body problem. There are several reasons why this particular view gives a more sensible for answer to the problem at hand. These reasons include the rationale behind the reasoning of brain research, how the different aspects of reductive physicalism is able to address the non-physical aspects of the mind, as well as the less than sensible claims that the opposing view, dualism, presents in comparison. One of the main reasons why physicalism is able to prove itself to be the better answer to the mind-body problem is based off of research that society has learned about on the brain.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Materialism in philosophy hold the thought that existence is explainable solely in material terms. In another word the physical supervene the mental, the mental is nothing over and above the physical. Materialists see the universe as a huge device held together by pieces of matter functioning in subjection to naturalistic laws. A substance is traditionally understood as an entity, or an object that depends on another object in order in order for it to exist.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (a) Physicalism is defined as being able to describe everything in our world through physical processes. This means that all facts are the result of physical facts, including brain states. Also, because everything results from physical facts there are only physical facts. Everything is able to be broken down through any means whether through chemistry or biology or any other way to its smallest parts and still be explained by its physical parts. (b) Armstrong’s argument for physicalism is that science is the best way to explain the mind problem.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. I would place Neil deGrasse Tyson closer to the scientism side of the scientism-creationism spectrum, but still near the middle of the spectrum. DeGrasse Tyson reveals his agnostic perspective when he says he does not believe in an afterlife because there is no evidence. However, he agrees with Larry King when he calls many believers “sincere and wonderful people”, and does not call them delusional. This respect for others’ beliefs even when he does not agree with them can help the relationship between faith and science.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance dualism is the ideology that there are two different types of worlds: the material world and the world of ideas. The material world is considered as the physical body that encounters its own experiences. As for the world of ideas, it is known as the mind, as the mind encounters its own experiences and has the ability to reason. Additionally, substance dualism is the relation of both the physical and non-physical world. It identifies how both the body and mind have different features and capabilities, but at the end they both interact with each other as they cannot survive on their own.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Intellect:Mind over Matter, Mortimer Adler probes the relationship between the mind and the body. He describes the four main theories regarding this relationship and separates them into two categories: extreme and moderate. Among the four theories, Adler argues in favor of moderate immaterialism. His argument is easily the most convincing as it accounts for the essential difference between man and animal, our intellect, while acknowledging the congruity between the mind and body.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Epiphenomenalism

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For example, the claim that bodies of human beings are alike in their construction and so most likely feel the same emotions when their bodies are affected by the same external source is no more plausible then the claim that machines who are programmed to think, plan and reason have minds of their own. For Rosenthal (2000), epiphenomenalism could make the claim that since mental events correlate with physical events as a matter of causal necessity, beings with a similar neurophysiological make-up should experience a similar mental life. Yet, this explanation becomes less likely considering that “we have little idea of why neurophysiological states should be accompanied by mental states at all” (McLaughlin et. al., 2009, p. 89).…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Importance Of Materialism

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What Is It Like? The Materialist without Phenomenal Qualities Rejean Allen Prof. Sanchez Philosophy 1305 Section 21 Materialism deals with the proposed fact that in reality, to be able to have an experience of a physical object in any given situation; a person will have to physically experience that moment, otherwise, they will never know what it is like. You will have to be in direct contact with that physical object and all the properties of it; to be able to say that you know what it felt like handling that object physically and emotionally. However, when dealing with materialism, we cannot take into account phenomenal qualities.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theory proposes that representations are symbolic structures which have similarities to natural languages, and these symbols are physically realised in the brain (Wilson 2011). For some, this process of cognition using representation can be thought of as thinking in a special inner language, which is referred to as Mentalese (Sterelny 1990: 24). For Fodor, thoughts are sentence-like, and this inner thought possesses some of the same features and structure of sentences in our natural languages (Sterelny 1990: 23). However, as Sterelny (1990: 24) pointed out, this does not mean that we will find tiny sentences of an individual 's natural language spelled out somewhere in the brain. Representations could be found within neural activity, where such activity can act as vehicles of content (Wilson 2011) and be employed by the brain for use in cognition.…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction The argument whether or not the mind and the body are distinct substances raises a still on-going debate. In this essay, I proceed to give evidence as to why the Cartesian dualism theory is flawed. First, I am going to introduce a few of Descartes’ arguments and his position on the matter. Then, I will try to pick his most appealing argument and put it up against logical reasoning and other philosophers’ viewpoints. Finally, I am going to conclude how Rene Descartes proposes fallacious arguments which object his mind-body problem.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Idealism and materialism are two contrary doctrines in philosophy. The idealism view contends there are no physical objects that exist outside the mind unless the mind is conscious of the physical object. Idealism believes everything takes place entirely in the mind and nothing exists outside of the mind. Whereas the materialistic view is that only material things exist. Materialism ascribes that material things are not dependent on the mind to exist which is in direct opposition to idealism.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays