Phillips Same Sex Wedding Essay

Improved Essays
In July 2012, petitioner Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop (co-petitioner), refused to make a cake for respondents Charlie Craig and David Mullins’ same-sex wedding, citing his religious beliefs. Craig and Mullins did not discuss any details of the cake with Phillips. Masterpiece Cakeshop is a “place of public accommodation” as defined by the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA).
On September 4th, 2012, Craig and Mullins each filed a complaint against Phillips with the Colorado Civil Rights Division (the Division) claiming that Phillips had engaged in sexual orientation discrimination in violation of CADA. The Division determined that Phillips violated CADA, prompting respondents to file a formal complaint with the Office of
…show more content…
Phillip’s Christian faith “compels him to use his artistic talents to promote only messages that align with his religious beliefs.” (“Petition for Writ” 2016:2). Accordingly, Phillips does not make Halloween cakes or baked goods containing alcohol as doing so would be an endorsement of practices counter to his religious beliefs. Phillip’s religion holds that marriage is sacred and can only take place between a man and a woman (“Petition for Writ” 2016:14). The Commission previously made an exemption to CADA for secular bakers who refused to bake cakes with anti- same-sex marriage messages (“Petition for Writ” 2016:27). Accommodating these bakers’ secular beliefs while refusing to accommodate Phillip’s Christian beliefs is …show more content…
Just the absence of a guest at an important event can indicate that guest’s disapproval, the creation of a piece of art for a wedding indicates of support for the marriage. Even if Craig and Mullins had ordered a nondescript cake, their wedding reception would still feature a Masterpiece Cakeshop Cake made by the bakery’s self-proclaimed artist; the plainness of a piece of art does not strip the artist’s association from the piece. Short of including a disclaimer with his cakes stating his religious beliefs, guests at Craig and Mullins’s wedding would assume the Phillips supports same-sex

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marriage is an important milestone in one’s life. It is a union of two people who vow to remain together and love one another until death does them apart. In Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen emphasizes the prominence of marriage based on loved rather than other influences. Through the experiences of Lydia and Wickham, Charlotte and Collins, and Elizabeth and Darcy, Austen criticizes marriages based on infatuation, convenience and money, and emphasizes that marriage can only be successful if they are founded on mutual love. Jane Austen criticizes the various different marriages in the novel.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also mentioned that he wants Chick-Fil-A to be established as a Christian organization. One could also argue that this falls under the concept sexual discrimination because some Chick-Fil-A employees might be homosexuals. However, as we learned in Law, Society, and Business, there are no recognized rights or federal statutes that specifically protect…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In "When Freedoms Collide" George writes about Elane Photography, in specific the horrid files of discrimination and law suits thrown at the owners: Elane Huguenin and her husband. It all began when Elane was contacted by a women named Vanessa Willock who asked to hire Elane Photography for her same gender commitment ceremony. Elane simply rejected because of religious reasons. After Willock got a response from Elane stating she does not photograph same sex marriage, her partner decided to also email Elane about a marriage she was having. Her partner did not disclose that it was same sex marriage and therefor Elane agreed to photograph.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They all presented similar arguments that since the bakery is considered a place of public accommodation, Phillips legally could not deny them goods or services based on their sexual orientation because of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act. Finn also pointed out that Phillips is a Christian, and the Bible does not state that homosexuality and same-sex marriage are not allowed. Alayna Renwick and Alex Minnick were advocates for the Masterpiece Cakeshop. They stated that Phillips first amendment rights would be violated by baking a cake for Charlie and David, due to the fact that Phillips says that same-sex marriage is against his religious beliefs. Almost all the arguments presented by both sides were valid, but some had a stronger case than others.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Traditionally, marriage has been referred to as a union between a man and a woman. In marriage, it is a “commitment of both partners before God to love, honor, and cherish each other – in sickness and in health, for richer or poorer” (Miller 177). In recent years, gay marriage has become an epidemic in societal news whether it is acceptable by God or not. There have been many opponents against gay marriage all with “Scripture as the foundation of their…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kathleen Bosko

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This court should find that Kathleen Bosko presented nondiscriminatory reasons that were pretext for intentional discrimination. Pretext can be proven by showing that the reasons proffered by the defendant did not actually motivate the defendant’s challenged conduct. Latowski v. Northwoods Nursing Ctr., 549 Fed. Appx. 478, 486 (6th Cir. 2013)(unpublished)…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case: Alabama V. Alabama

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Christian woman who was told to remove her headscarf for a driver’s license photo has sued officials of Alabama county, saying her faith convicts her to cover her hair. In December last year, Yvonne Allen of Tuskegee tried to renew her driver’s license, and she was told to remove her headscarf because “only Muslim women have the right to cover their hair.” On Tuesday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit on her behalf, saying the Alabama officials violated Allen’s religious rights, Christian Today details.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Gibson In the case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, a newly engaged same-sex couple (David Mullins and Charlie Craig; along with their mothers) wished to order a wedding cake from a local baker, Jack Phillips. After a brief introduction, yet before the order specifications were discussed, Mr. Phillips (a devout Christian) informed the gentleman that he would not be willing to fulfill the couple's order, because his religion prohibits same-sex marriage. In light of the recent legal recognition of the couples relationship; this couple must face the brisk reality - laws may change, but to their neighbors they still aren't equal. Mr. Phillips felt that by contributing to the celebration he would be committing…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 2012, Charlie Craig and David Mullins went to Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood,CO, and requested that its owner, Jack C.Phillips, design and create a cake for their wedding. Phillips refused to design the cake because of religious beliefs, he doesn’t create wedding cakes for the same sex wedding. The issue is that since Phillips declined to create the cake, Craig and David Mullins filed charges of discrimination with the Colorado Civil Rights Division; they formed a formal complaint with the office of Administrative Courts. On August 13, 2015, the Colorado court of appeals unanimously affirmed the commission’s order, finding that the bakery discriminated and violated the state law. The Colorado Supreme Court denied review while the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 26, 2017.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    First, in the case Ingersoll v. Arlenese Flowers, a business owner named Barronelle Stuzman, refused to give her service of floral arrangements for the gay couples wedding because it goes against her beliefs. The couple had been customers of Stutzman's shop for nine years, but when they asked her to provide flowers for their wedding, the florist declined, citing her "relationship with Jesus Christ (Kaplan 2015). The court ruled that Stuzman, was violating discrimination laws put into place in. Stuzman appealed to the Supreme Court where they affirmed the lower court’s ruling. However, Stuzman is not giving up, as she is asking the Supreme Court to reverse the decision.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apodaca Case Study

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Claim of Apodaca, 769 P.2d 88 (N.M. 1989) Procedural History: A writ of certiorari was filed by the employee in order to challenge the award of unemployment insurance. The employer filed this certiorari to the Employment Security Department. Certiorari was filed by the employer in order to challenge the award of unemployment insurance.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlie Craig and David Mullins are a homosexual couple from Lakewood, Colorado that were in search of a cake for their weeding day much to their surprise when they entered Masterpiece Cakeshop the owner refused to sell them a wedding cake as it violated his personal religious beliefs. A Supreme Court Case was open in ruling that the owner Jack Phillips was discriminating the couple for their sexual preferences. In the first audio the court case of Jack Philips claims that he did not believe he was acting against the law because there has been various occasions in the past were the owners of cakeshops have denied their services to same-sex couples with the claim that they have the right to express their beliefs under the jurisdiction of the…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Autozone Case Summary

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This court case involves the plaintiff, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the plaintiff intervenor, Chad Farr, and the defendant, AutoZone, Inc. This case was conducted in 2006 on the alleged complaint that AutoZone violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by failing to provide a reasonable accommodation to Mr. Chad Farr who is visually impaired and denying him a promotion due to this disability. Farr was diagnosed with retinitis pigmentosa when he was young causing him to have poor peripheral and night vision. This disability also leaves him with tunnel visions.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Minneapolis v. ACLU (2015) Opinion of the Court: Bradley May 2013 saw the arrival of an exhibit to the Minneapolis Institute of Art. The exhibit contents featured were A)photos of nude men and women depicted in a variety of poses, B) photos of adults engaged in various sexual activities, and C) pictures of several nude men standing very close to one another. Finally, there were several pictures that resembled recent advertisements by a famous clothes designer. This last set of photos portrayed D) teenage children dressed in very little clothing, who were also placed in allegedly “erotic” poses.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Marriage Consent

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Does marriage change the notion of consent? This question comes to mind every time a married man or a woman claims to undergo rape from under their spouses’ hands. It is important to note that in every relationship, inclusive of marriage, whenever one of the partners partakes in sexual activity that they have not agreed to, it constitutes to rape or sexual assault. What is sexual assault? This is another question that comes to mind, sexual assault is any sexual behavior that takes place without the consent of the victim.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays