Maryland V. Buie Case Study

Improved Essays
A protective sweep is a limited search of a structure for people who may be a threat to law enforcement officers after they arrest a subject or subjects. The legal reasoning behind a protective sweep is “to allow officers to ensure their own safety, and that of those on the scene, by searching in the vicinity of the arrest” (Nolo, 2017). Protective sweeps were ruled in favor of law enforcement in the Supreme Court case of Maryland v. Buie. In this case, arrest warrants were issued for Buie and his accomplice in regards to an armed robbery. Upon serving the arrest warrant at Buie’s residence in which they took Buie into custody, one of the officer’s subsequently looked in the basement to ensure the other suspect was not hiding down there. While

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions. An important factor of the case is Peggy Stewart’s significant abuse by her husband, Mike. Additionally, Mike’s abuse was not only to Peggy; but also to her daughter, Carla.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (2003) Parties: State of Maryland, Petitioner / Appellant Joseph Jermaine Pringle, Defendant / Appellee Case Facts: On August 7th, 1999 a Maryland police officers legally stopped a car for speeding in the early morning hours. The car was occupied by three men, to include the Defendant/Appellee Joseph Jermaine Pringle. The Officer that initiated the stop saw a large roll of cash in the glovebox while the driver was retrieving his registration. All men were checked and cleared for outstanding warrants and a warning was issued to the vehicles driver. The officer requested and was granted permission to search the vehicle.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of the State of New Hampshire v. Sondra Murray, Ms. Murray was charged with disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, and possession of marijuana. She was convicted of the disorderly conduct which violated N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 644:2, and possession of marijuana, which violated N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case, Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83, Certiorari was granted to a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to consider whether petitioner was denied a federal right when the appeals court restricted its grant of a new murder trial to the question of punishment, leaving the determination of guilt undisturbed. The appeals court granted a retrial after holding that suppression of evidence by the state violated petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause, U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV (Law School Case Briefs, 2013). Furthermore, there was a judgement that had granted the petitioner a new murder trial that was solely based on the issue of his punishment. Since the petitioner was convicted of murder and then sentenced to death in his first trail with the Maryland Court, the petitioner was then informed that the Maryland Courts had withheld a statement that indicated that another individual had admitted that exact homicide. What the Supreme Court had concluded from this case was that, because of the suppression of the evidence was in favorable to an accused upon the request that violated the Due Process Clause required the court to a…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the Baze v. Rees case, two inmates named Ralph Baze and Thomas Bowling were convicted for murder and sentenced with the death penalty. In 1992, Ralph Baze killed a Kentucky County Sheriff with three shots fired in his back, and also killed a deputy sheriff with two shots in the back and one in the back of his head (Rushford). The other inmate, Thomas Bowling rammed into a car in the dry cleaning parking lot; he got out of the car and shot the couple and the two-year-old child in the car and drove away in 1990 (Rushford). Baze and Bowling had claimed that Kentucky’s lethal injections is cruel and unusual punishment which is a violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. The lethal injections is a process that includes a dose of Diazepam which…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Robert versus Boston- Robert v. Boston challenged the separation of schools based on the color of their skin (nps.com). In 1848, a year old girl named Sarah Roberts was stopped from going to that school because she was black. Her dad Benjamin pressed charges against the city. The lawsuit was a effort by the black community to end segregated schools.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    State V. Evans Case Study

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case of State v. Evans, 671 N.W.2d 720, (2003). , we see the distress of the victim that suffered from both harassment and stalking from her predator for a period that span more than three years (Brody and Acker, 2010). The harassment aspect that Hubert Evans summited the victim, Rebecca Arnold, to started out at a very slow rate with it become more intense and leading to stalking over years leading to the arrest of Mr. Evans and criminal conviction for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010). The criminal charges were heard by a judge and jury where Mr. Evans gained a criminal conviction for the charges that he faced in the trial. The criminal conviction of Mr. Evans lead to his appeal to the State of Iowa Appeals court to evaluate the case as it relates to the state statute for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010).…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the privacy of students comes into question there are mixed responses, especially when it comes to the contents of a student’s bag. From the landmark supreme court case TLO v. New Jersey, the privacy students have in school has inevitably come into question. Whether TLO or New Jersey was right, this court case changed the way we look at students and their privacy. Some may argue that students have no privacy in school while others may think they have too much. Has the Supreme Court already decided where they stand on this hot button topic?…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    IRAC of #2B II. Count Two of the criminal complaint, possession of equipment to manufacture methamphetamine, should be dismissed on the ground that it is a lesser-included offense of Count Three, manufacture of methamphetamine ("meth"). The issue in the present case is whether §43: Possession of Equipment or Supplies with Intent to Manufacture Meth (“Possession of Equipment”) should be dismissed because it is a lesser-included offense of Count Three, §51: Manufacture of Meth. A defendant cannot be charged with the same crime twice, for that would be considered double jeopardy.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the most intellectual forces of the Marshall Court was its importance on the Supreme Court's power in Marbury v. Madison. Preceding to the Marshall Court, organizers of the Constitution, For example, Alexander Hamilton inquired the Supreme Court part as the lowest part of the major branch of government. The Marshall Court changed this knowledge in Marbury v. Madison. The case's crucial issue was whether the court had the power to support a constitutional check on the case.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The productivity of the text is limited to its utilitarian purpose: it successfully informs all who is concerned about joining the League of Women Voters in their protests. It also has a probability of creating a strong emotional impact for sympathizers of LoWV opinion on recent impacts of the decision on Shelby County v. Holde case, as well as for people who are uninformed about a situation…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Barron v. Baltimore is a landmark case in that it is the first of its kind to ever be heard and decided, meaning that this case does not use any precedent, but is the case that sets the precedent for future cases. Within the decision, there is no ideological split in the vote and with Baldwin not participating the decision was a true unified conclusion. There are multiple implications for future cases, one being that cases can be brought to the Supreme Court, but that they are likely to not be heard, due to the Supreme Court previously deciding that they have no jurisdiction. Another implication is that the Supreme Court could hear the case but return to Barron v. Baltimore and make the same decision. Indeed, the Supreme Court did return to…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Lawful Searches

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lawful Searches Law enforcement officers are bound to certain rules that limit their powers of search and seizure. These rules are governed by constitutional rights and administered by the supreme court. These rules were placed on officer to prevent corruption and protect the rights of citizens from corrupt officers. The use of a search warrant signed by a judge must accompany a search of residences that are believed to have evidence that prove the guilt of a suspect residing on the property.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R. v. Dudley and Stephens (1884) Facts On May 19, 1884 the Mignonette set sail for Sydney, Australia. The yacht sailed with four crew members: Tom Dudley, Edwin Stephens, Edmund Brooks and Richard Parker. On July 5, the yacht sank. The men found a lifeboat that only contained two, 1 pound cans of turnip.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Court Case Study: Hamdy V.

    • 1932 Words
    • 8 Pages

    RELEVANT BACKGROUND INFORMATION Developmental History Mr. Hamdy was born in Cairo, Egypt to the intact union of his parents, Ihab Mohammad Hamdy and Iman Abdelgawad. The elder, Dr. Hamdy offered that the defendant was born on time during a vaginal birth. He also reported regular prenatal visits while his wife was pregnant with their son. He stated that Mr. Hamdy reached developmental milestones, such as walking and talking, at the same rate as other children with no developmental delays noted.…

    • 1932 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays