Marxistian Analysis Essay

Improved Essays
Marxian Analysis and the Realities of the Modern Economy Far from becoming a historical relic, the role of Marxian analysis in today’s economy is both predominant and relevant in modern economic thought. Although the twenty-first century does, at first glance, appear to be a different reality from Marx’s nineteenth century entirely, the core principles of Marx’s work remain relevant and useful, although some of the interpretations made by Marx do need to be modernised somewhat. The modern economy still contains oppression by a ruling class over a subsistence group, with the labour surplus thereof creating profits for the bourgeoisie. These profits are still held by significant parties and institutions, as in Marx’s time, rather than becoming …show more content…
What Marx knew as imperialism has found a new identity as the international finance capital market , who hoard their profits at the expense of the proletariat who is responsible for their base wealth. As capitalist society grows, it takes advantage of cheap labour available in other parts of the world and uses the resulting surplus to finance its own gains at the expense of the working classes, reinvesting only for self-profit rather than for anything resembling social improvement of the working class.
Even when the most capitalistic structures crash, this does not result in any net gain for the proletariat but rather an increased loss, such as the government bail out of the American banking sector, which has left the capitalists in much the same state as they began but has prevented the allocation of resources through education or health spending to the proletariat classes during that time . Marx felt that, given enough crises, that capitalism would collapse and give way to communism , yet the government intervention through many of the past economic crises has prevented this from occurring thus

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dissent from Capitalism “What does this accusation amount to? The history of all past society is the history of class antagonisms, which took different forms in different epochs” (Blaisdell 140-141). Karl Marx made an accusation that capitalism will eventually come to an end.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Truth be told, it would be fair to say that our group agreed on little and argued on much. The majority of our analysis of the Marxist lens was launched into into orbit around the first question posed: “Did the bourgeoisie maintain their dominance over the masses after the witch hunts had concluded?” Citing the quotation “ To all intents and purposes, the power of theocracy in Massachusetts was broken” (Miller, Act One, 125) Immediately two different viewpoints immerged, the decisive, albeit simplistic, yes and no.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States today, people are debating around the ideals of the candidates for the presidential election. People try to claim how one candidate is unrealistic while the others are revolutionary. Focusing on Bernie Sanders’ campaign, we see the argument rise with his assumptions of money and the United States economy. Supporters bolster how his plans for healthcare and correcting student loans are the stepping stones to a better future. Opposers refute how they have no idea where Sanders expect these funds to arise from, and attack notions of changing taxation to apply better to how wealth is distributed.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith are both economists with theories of capital accumulation. Karl Marx was a German doctor of Philosophy. Adam Smith who was a Scottish moral philosopher developed a similar theory. The theories differ in the way they perceive labor value. Smith’s theory has a clear argument on capital accumulation such as his explanation for unproductive/productive labor in comparison to Marx.…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx presented Marxism as a way of understanding class divisions in the world that were based on the emphasis on materialism. Marx proposed a society without money or class divisions, diminishing the idea of materialism and capitalism, instead offering that equality in a society is based on how a society is run. Marx’s claims stemmed from an ideological perspective that individuals are more inclined to their wants instead of their needs, he offers that a society must work in a way where not just one individual but an entire society must give what they can to their state or government and take what they need not what they want. Doing this, Marx argues, will remove class conflict and monetary disparities. Marx idealized a utopia of equality for all, not just a certain few.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx's Class Theory Essay

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marx's class theory determines what class you belong to depending on your means of production, meaning who owned the assets necessary to produce what people needed in order to survive. The people who owned the most land and factories were considered to be higher up in the social class hierarchy, also known as the first class the bourgeoisie. They would then control all of the elements in society as well as having control over the working class. Then there is the second class known as the proletariat, these were the people of the lower class who worked in the factories or land owned by the bourgeoisie for hourly wages. This shows that using Marx theory is a quick and simple way to determine someone’s rank in society.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This paper will examine the purpose of the state by looking at two-political thinkers John Locke and Karl Marx. The ideas of Locke’s theories are about the “good of the government” meaning that people need a government to rule over them and enforce laws that will be followed by everyone. However, this concept was not shared by Marx as he was aware of the injustice of the government, which is to only protect the (bourgeoisie) who are the capitalist and oppress the (proletarians) who are the working class. John Locke, wrote the state of nature in the book second Treatise on Civil Government (1680), during the British civil war. Locke was a firm believer of Christianity (Locke,1680, sec 6) and he believed all mankind are born equal regardless…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Marxism

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marxist’s theory of Unionism Marx theory emphasized that unionism came about as a reason to promote socioeconomic, political, ideological and social developments (Annunziato, 2009). This theory is built on Adam Smith’s theory of labour value and the focus of this theory is to eliminate competition among labour though, he believed the struggle was to overcome capitalism. Webb believes that this theory is the exact extension of democracy, though it is observed from an industrial perspective. He argued that collective bargaining is the only way to strengthen the power of labour.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It would not be advantageous to us or to anyone if we exploited consumers, therefore, Marx’s proposed regulation and redistribution is ridiculous and would never work as a viable system in the real…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx Post Capitalism

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Karl Marx, capitalism entails maximization of personal profit making activities to get rich. This theory emerged during the industrial revolution in Western Europe and it spread through the world through the philosophies of Karl Marx. It is applicable to many activities in the human life like production where production and distribution of goods and services is done within capitalist societies. The forms of making money or getting rich by private individuals may include merchant trade, production for profit and capital investments is a variety of sectors that is aimed at maximizing profit margins. This leads to personal struggle in the field of business and the government has no part to play in making legislations that discourage…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx evaluated the capitalistic system through economic and social discourse. He evaluated the effects of the transition from a socially stratified society in feudalism to the capitalistic result that was the current trend in society. I will discuss how the minimum wage debate is viewed through a Marxist perspective Although the means of production was undergoing enormous leaps forward through the industrial revolution, the movement out of feudalism ceased to improve for those who lacked capital or property ownership.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays