Martin Luther's Argument Essay

When assembling an argument, one must consider both sides. In the case of the argument for reform within the Roman Catholic Church, Martin Luther provided a profoundly heretical response for his time. Known as the individual who sparked the ecclesiastical reformation, otherwise known as the Protestant Reformation, Luther was able to clearly state his arguments for eliminating the power that the Spiritual estate seemingly had over the temporal state. Throughout To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation, Luther portrays the three walls as the Roman Catholic Church’s attempt to delay transformation within the Christendom. Luther displays a great deal of worry for the future of the Church, concerning their distinct confinement behind the dominating walls of the Roman Church. In an attempt to make Catholicism more accessible to the general public, Luther’s approach to completely disband all three of the metaphorical walls that the Romanists …show more content…
The first wall, temporal power has no jurisdiction over the spiritual estate, is establishing a sense of inequality within the Church. By instituting a superiority over the temporal state, the Romanist Church are making a claim that the two estates are different, separate, and unequal. Luther does not believe this is the case. Using scripture, Luther disputes the hypocrisy that is being exemplified within the Church, rejecting their notion of the spiritual order being superior to the temporal. Within St. Paul’s Letter to the Corinthians 12:12, Paul addresses the entirety of the Church, acknowledging that they are all a distinct part of the One, equal body of Christ. Because of this biblical prose, it is apparent to both Luther and his followers that the real law of the Church is that both estates are to be equal. The two powers within the church, spiritual and secular, deserve a proportional