http://www.thekingcenter.org/about-dr-king This source is dedicated to educate the world on the life, legacy and teachings of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. It emphasizes the most important events of his life, his accomplishments, and his teachings. This source meets the currency criteria pretty well, because it was revised on 2014, which compared to the year of Dr. King's death, is accurately current. It is relevant because the whole source is about Martin Luther King, Jr, the website is called thekingcenter.org, which would give you all types of information about the topic, and the accuracy of this source is well supported. The purpose of the source is to share facts about the topic, so I think this source’s purpose and authority meets the
…show more content…
The description of website IMDb.com is to find showtimes, watch trailers, browse photos, and rate movies and TV shows, which really doesn’t seem very accurate to use as a source if we are looking for valid and academic information. Since the source just gives us a short trailer, we can’t get any information, and the movie description is very short and vague also, so I don’t thinks it meets the CRAAP criteria because it is not relevant or accurate, and the purpose of the source is to promote a movie, not to give information. Also the author and the date of the article is not mentioned. I would not use this source for an academic writing, instead, I think it would be better to watch the movie and get information from it and use it as a …show more content…
The video is 3 minutes long, but it gives detailed information on the topic. The video is part of an article, and it was published on 2009, which is not very recent, but compared to the date of this event, is current enough, and it was updated on 2017. This source is History.com, which is a very valid source of information. Although the video is a little short, as I said, it has a lot of facts, and there are many more videos available. As a source, it seems very relevant. It meets the authority criteria by giving credit to the author, contact information, and the publisher information. The purpose of the source is to inform and give facts on the events presented. I thinks this is a useful and reliable source, therefore, I would recommend it and use it as a source for an academic
The description of website IMDb.com is to find showtimes, watch trailers, browse photos, and rate movies and TV shows, which really doesn’t seem very accurate to use as a source if we are looking for valid and academic information. Since the source just gives us a short trailer, we can’t get any information, and the movie description is very short and vague also, so I don’t thinks it meets the CRAAP criteria because it is not relevant or accurate, and the purpose of the source is to promote a movie, not to give information. Also the author and the date of the article is not mentioned. I would not use this source for an academic writing, instead, I think it would be better to watch the movie and get information from it and use it as a …show more content…
The video is 3 minutes long, but it gives detailed information on the topic. The video is part of an article, and it was published on 2009, which is not very recent, but compared to the date of this event, is current enough, and it was updated on 2017. This source is History.com, which is a very valid source of information. Although the video is a little short, as I said, it has a lot of facts, and there are many more videos available. As a source, it seems very relevant. It meets the authority criteria by giving credit to the author, contact information, and the publisher information. The purpose of the source is to inform and give facts on the events presented. I thinks this is a useful and reliable source, therefore, I would recommend it and use it as a source for an academic