Martin Luther King Jr's Concept Of Civil Disobedience

Great Essays
In this historical study, an argument will be made that the Martin Luther King was influenced by Henry Thoreau’s concept of “civil disobedience” in the non-violent opposition to unjust laws. In the Civil Rights Movement, King utilized Thoreau’s concept of civil disobedience to galvanize a peace movement that relied on non-compliance with unjust laws to deescalate the violence that was being used by the police and the military against African-American in the 1950s. Thoreau’s motivation for civil disobedience relies heavily on the premise of unjust laws to provide a moral vindication for oppressed peoples to choose not to acknowledge these laws. This provides evidence of the connection with King’s underlying refusal to accept unjust racial laws being implemented by southern states, which involve the segregation of white and black people. In essence, Thoreau’s civil disobedience was a major influence on King’s civil rights leadership by refusing to acknowledge unjust laws through …show more content…
In the 1950s, King’s leadership provided a new way to countermand unjust segregating laws by bringing people together by advocating non-violence. After all, African-American riots had created chaos and havoc in local communities due to racial injustice, which only provided a rationale for the local police and military to use force. King was ware of the importance civil disobedience as a way to train Civil Rights activists to use passive resistance as a direct form of protest. This form of mobilization would involve “sit-ins” at local All-white eating establishments, sitting in seats only reserved for whites, and other measures that would break the law without violence. King () defines the importance of this aspect of Thoreau's ideology that formed the non-violent protest movement of this

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Mlk Rhetorical Appeal

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was the greatest example of strength and perseverance. Despite the racial aggression against individuals of color, he defended them and fought for their rights. Provided that King’s purpose was to make abolish the segregation laws, he delivered a strong message stating that an individual’s skin color does not disqualify them from enjoying the freedom that America promises. At the same time, King states that aside from personal views on segregation the act is against unconstitutional. Whit this intention, King used a logical and emotional appeal in his works to convey his audience that segregation was both unconstitutional and invidious.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On April 12, 1963, a group of clergymen trivialized the demonstrations held by some Negro citizens as “unwise” and “untimely”. The clergymen dismissed that such actions would incite only violence and hate to build up in the community. Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, the leader of the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s, articulates that their convictions are wrong. In his response letter, King argues that nonviolent resistance promotes peace, and by using many rhetorical devices but mainly allusions and repetition and imagery, he eloquently justifies that his demonstrations advance camaraderie in the community and a lack of them leads to disparity.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” Martin Luther King expresses a ‘critical citizenship’ doctrine of political obligation where laws should command and adhere to moral authority. In this letter, Martin Luther King communicates the injustices occurring towards the black community in Birmingham, Alabama as they peacefully demonstrate against police brutality, targeted attacks, and most likely the worst record of segregation in all of the United States (1). The political obligation doctrine of ‘critical citizenship’ that King promotes is continually refused to be negotiated by political leaders various times in 1960s Birmingham, leaving the black community with no other alternative but to demonstrate peacefully through non-violent, yet tension-creating…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    4) Martin Luther King explained the term of his action called “Civil disobedience”. And it is nothing new. As reference the Bible, he gives the example of the refusal of some Jews to listen the law of Nebuchadnezzar which was unconfirmed to the religious and ethical law. In the same way that some Christians refused to listen to the unjust law to the Roman empire. This civil disobedience leads to the creation of academy freedom a degree due to the civil disobedience of Socrates.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    During times of political turmoil, very few ever had the courage to face the injustice. Courage such as that is few and far between. Two of these outliers were Henry Thoreau and Martin Luther King. Henry Thoreau was an American writer and poet who lived from 1817 to 1862. He was the author of numerous articles, including On the Duty of Civil Disobedience.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, King explores and rejects the different issues presented as a public statement of concern, issued by religious leaders in the South. King talks about his decision of nonviolence in his movement against racial segregation and addresses the problems people were making everyday in respect to the end of segregation. He discusses his personal experience dealing with racial segregation and his reason to promote change. King also discussed the injustice law seemed to reinforce in his society. “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crises and establish such creative tension that a community that has consistently refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue.”…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leaders of the movement such as Martin Luther King Jr., as well as “major organizations involved with the Civil Rights movement came to insist that the lessons of the postwar period had been well-learnt and that there would be no return to the violence of form or spirit that characterized radicalism in the late Depression years,” (Stears 150). Civil Rights activists did not want to drastically change laws, they simply wanted to hold the government to its word and make sure that everyone was equal. Unlike movements in the past, the methods of protest the leaders called for (such as sit-in protests and peaceful rallies) sought to speak to society’s morals. This peaceful protest strategy largely reconstructed America because it, along with the contrasting strategies of the Black Power movement, helped to enable outlawing racial segregation and create voting equality. “The argument was reinforced by the fact that many of the struggles that the movement was engaged in were in pursuit not of now laws based on abstract ideals but of effective enforcement of already existing federal legislation and judicially recognized constitutional rights,” (Stears…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. encountered a different opposition, which involved changing the entire country’s views. King peacefully protests racial oppression and segregation in the United States to assist a whole country rather than a single individual. He observes civil disobedience as a way of protest on unjust laws of the country, rather than protesting a law regarding a singular person’s unfair treatment. King backs his approach on civil disobedience by illustrating his four steps, which are “the collection of the facts to determine whether injustices are alive, negotiation, self-purification, and direct action” (King, 1). With every one of his beliefs and acts, King defends himself by indicating how unjust the laws have treated the African Americans of the nation.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King was not the first to seek equality, but the way he led the movement is what set him apart from his precursors. His ability to work with political figure-heads without the use of violence was revolutionary, and one could even say, ahead of his time. In his letter written while imprisoned in a Birmingham jail, he describes the four steps to a non-violent protest. The first step is the “collection of facts to determine whether injustices exist.” (King 1).…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antigone Case Study

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In his famed “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Dr. King defends his and other civil rights leaders’ civil disobedience from a jail cell in Alabama. Responding directly to accusations from white Christians that civil disobedience was dangerously destabilizing to government itself, Dr. King outlines a method wherein citizens can disobey unjust laws while still respecting law itself. Recognizing the legitimacy of these concerns, King requires that citizens only disobey unjust laws which are “inflicted upon a minority which that minority had no part in enacting or creating because it did not have the unhampered right to vote,” (King 1963, 80). Furthermore, in order to respect law as an institution, a dissenter must ask him or herself, “are you able to endure the ordeals of jail,” (King 1963 2). He requires that those who break unjust laws “do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty,” (King [Ali-Dinar], 1963).…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Effects Of Mass Hysteria

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In an article by Anthony Badger it says, “recent historians have raised questions about the centrality of the nonviolent protest exemplified by King. African Americans in the rural South had always had a tradition of armed self-defense. World War II inspired black soldiers not to turn the other cheek on their return to the South” (Badger). They were prepared to fight back. There were many violent acts against them, but also many that they caused.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King encouraged the fight towards greater change using nonviolent protest. He used tactics such as sit-ins, marches, and bus boycott. In using this strategy, King describes his hopes and efforts to ease racism throughout the letter. This document was well written and thought out to provide the clergyman insight on what King’s motives were towards justice for all.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thoreau’s essay is also different from King’s because he presents more than one goal. Not only does he describe the government’s unfair laws, but he also teaches his readers how and why to revolt, and tells them to bring an end to the ongoing Mexican War. Despite these differences, both Thoreau and King share strong similar beliefs of morality and justice that are clearly seen throughout the entirety of both essays. Both authors in their respective essays tell the people why and how they should fight for justice. They explain that in order to fight for justice, we must first distinguish between the just and unjust laws.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thoreau criticizes the materialism of American society in a critical manner by implying that “government is best which governs less” (Thoreau 1) demonstrating his belief that government 's control its people for self benefit. Dr. King criticizes the government in a similar manner to Thoreau by directing his statement of “we have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God given rights” (King 3), which states himself as the voice of the oppressed which seek for equality. In addition, Dr. King envisions that “justice too long delayed is justice denied” (King 3), which explains his direct and aggressive approach toward the clergyman. As both direct each other’s audience in a logical attempt to leave the need to take action in any act of injustice, King uses his emotion and religious knowledge as part of his tone. His affecting intentions include his quotation, “by developing an unconscious bitterness… have to concoct an answer for a five year old son who is asking: ‘Daddy, why do white people treat colored people so mean?’” continuing with “when you are humiliated day in and day out by nagging signs reading ‘white’ and ‘colored’.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays