Regardless of his death by assassination in April 1968 Martin …show more content…
Memorial and the Politics of Collective Memory are “central signifiers that define the meaning and impact of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, and thus the status of race relations and race politics since that time” Outlining that King has been signified as a myth to display the progression of neoliberalism within the United States. Within Ernst Kantorowicz’s “The King’s Two Bodies” , writes what they reference to as a “halo of perpetuity,” accounting that “we often find the halo bestowed on such figures as might impersonate a supra-individual idea or general …show more content…
This figure is comprised of 51 percent who said that it had been fully realized and 23 percent who said that there had been major progress towards its realization.” (Kevin Bruyneel, 2013) Therefore, one-half to three-quarters of the U.S populace deem the United States as a neoliberal society ruling that the nation’s divide on racial power struggles to be non-existent in present day sense.
A further aspect that led to the mythologising of Dr King came from him as an individual. In a 1961 Article in the New York Times Magazine, writer Ved Mehta contrasted Gandhi to Martin Luther King in the likelihood that they shared the same dramatic brilliance. With both governing protests as if it were a theatric performance describing them as "imaginative artists who knew how to use world politics as their stage.”
David Halberstam, American journalist and historian later would go on to narrate the Civil Rights Movement as "a great televised morality play, white hats and black hats; lift up the black and there would be the white face of Bull Connor; lift up the white hat and there would be the solemn black face of Martin King." Both these observations are remembrances that Martin Luther King was in the most lucid sense an actor: learning his trade in the Church and perfecting it to the expectations of the