In typical Dem fashion even their "Apologies" are not really "Apologies." It would be nice to actually mention the "Jew/Atheist" that you were trying to slander in your apology.
Marshall's apology is, in truth a "Regret" letter. Democrats are always filled with "Regrets" but, only after they have been caught red handed.
Wikileaks provided proof that Bernie Sanders was right all along, when, for months, he was accusing the DNC of favoring Hillary. While they denied it and were going on all the station "Pretending Outraged" by the very suggestion the DNC would do that, DNC CFO Brad Marshall was sending out emails questioning Sanders’ Jewish faith.
Marshall wrote in a message to several DNC communications directors suggesting that by painting Bernie as an atheist “could make several points difference” in several late primary contests.
Marshall's email read. “It might may (sic) no difference, …show more content…
The entire Facebook post: “I deeply regret that my insensitive, emotional emails would cause embarrassment to the DNC, the Chairwoman, and all of the staffers who worked hard to make the primary a fair and open process.
The comments expressed do not reflect my beliefs nor do they reflect the beliefs of the DNC and its employees. I apologize to those I offended.”
After reading his non-apologetic "Apology" I am left wondering. what does he mean "The comments expressed do not reflect my beliefs?"
The Facebook Apology? Because, then he is saying "I don't regret shit"
The eMail? Since he wrote it, how could they NOT reflect Marshall's beliefs
The DNC? Since the DNC never sent a "How dare you?" in the "Respond" subject line and in fact answered all his musings, then YES that eMail does in fact prove exactly what the DNC higher ups beliefs
Marshall's apology is, in truth a "Regret" letter. Democrats are always filled with "Regrets" but, only after they have been caught red handed.
Wikileaks provided proof that Bernie Sanders was right all along, when, for months, he was accusing the DNC of favoring Hillary. While they denied it and were going on all the station "Pretending Outraged" by the very suggestion the DNC would do that, DNC CFO Brad Marshall was sending out emails questioning Sanders’ Jewish faith.
Marshall wrote in a message to several DNC communications directors suggesting that by painting Bernie as an atheist “could make several points difference” in several late primary contests.
Marshall's email read. “It might may (sic) no difference, …show more content…
The entire Facebook post: “I deeply regret that my insensitive, emotional emails would cause embarrassment to the DNC, the Chairwoman, and all of the staffers who worked hard to make the primary a fair and open process.
The comments expressed do not reflect my beliefs nor do they reflect the beliefs of the DNC and its employees. I apologize to those I offended.”
After reading his non-apologetic "Apology" I am left wondering. what does he mean "The comments expressed do not reflect my beliefs?"
The Facebook Apology? Because, then he is saying "I don't regret shit"
The eMail? Since he wrote it, how could they NOT reflect Marshall's beliefs
The DNC? Since the DNC never sent a "How dare you?" in the "Respond" subject line and in fact answered all his musings, then YES that eMail does in fact prove exactly what the DNC higher ups beliefs