Nonetheless, like all the Gospels, and all religions in general, Luke’s Gospel could be used to teach social and ethical morals (especially when applied to a specific group of people and their traditions/cultures, more specifically the Jews led by Christ in this particular time). It is, after all, a collection of accounts by Luke on Christianity, and the religion alone is a string of social and ethical teachings: it’s probably one of the largest components. What makes it stand as a type of teaching device is how it reflects on Jesus’s progression through the faith; he rejected the already standing morals and ethics by allowing new ones to flourish and truly define Christianity. All of Christ’s additions were supposed to be updated rulings and societal traditions to make the lives of the Jews easier, as well as less difficult to understand/follow. I do agree that it is a teaching on social and ethical teachings, whether or not it was truly meant to be from the
Nonetheless, like all the Gospels, and all religions in general, Luke’s Gospel could be used to teach social and ethical morals (especially when applied to a specific group of people and their traditions/cultures, more specifically the Jews led by Christ in this particular time). It is, after all, a collection of accounts by Luke on Christianity, and the religion alone is a string of social and ethical teachings: it’s probably one of the largest components. What makes it stand as a type of teaching device is how it reflects on Jesus’s progression through the faith; he rejected the already standing morals and ethics by allowing new ones to flourish and truly define Christianity. All of Christ’s additions were supposed to be updated rulings and societal traditions to make the lives of the Jews easier, as well as less difficult to understand/follow. I do agree that it is a teaching on social and ethical teachings, whether or not it was truly meant to be from the