First, Twain compares a buffalo hunt were people killed much more than was needed just for sport, to an anaconda cage where the reptile killed for food. His assumption was that humans kill for cruelty whereas the anaconda showed no signs of cruelty and left the remaining calves alone. Twain’s experiment didn’t lead into when the next time the anaconda became hungry thought, so I must believe the analysis was not necessarily complete.
Secondly, Twain compares humanity’s want of accumulation of wealth to animals