Mark David Chapman Research Paper

Improved Essays
On December 8th, 1980, John Winston Lennon was shot in the back four times while returning to his apartment in New York. Mark David Chapman was the man who fired these shots. Mark David Chapman was charged with manslaughter but pleaded insanity and got away with it. I believe he knew what he was doing and totally understood the consequences, but played off as he didn’t. I also believe he should’ve been charged with life in prison rather than having his own private prison home.
John Lennon was an extremely beloved man. He was loved by his friends, family, and complete strangers. He was married by a woman named Yoko Ono. Together, they seemed to be the happiest couple alive. Always on the beach, running and playing. There was never any directed
…show more content…
Three for the prosecution, six for the defense, and several more on behalf of the court. He was pushing hard for the plea of insanity and he got it. On August 24, 1981, the sentencing hearing took place. Two experts gave evidence on Chapman's behalf. The district attorney argued that Chapman committed the murder as an easy route to fame. When Chapman was asked if he had anything to say, he rose and read the passage from The Catcher in the Rye, when Holden tells his little sister, Phoebe, what he wants to do with his life: “Anyway, I keep picturing all these little kids playing some game in this big field of rye and all. Thousands of little kids, and nobody's around – nobody big, I mean – except me. And I'm standing on the edge of some crazy cliff. What I have to do, I have to catch everybody if they start to go over the cliff – I mean if they're running and they don't look where they're going I have to come out from somewhere and catch them. That's all I do all day. I'd just be the catcher in the rye and all.” After hearing this come from Chapman, the judge ordered psychiatric treatment in prison and sentenced Chapman to 20-years-to-life. Chapman was given five years less than the maximum because he pleaded guilty to second degree murder, thereby avoiding the time and expense of a …show more content…
It doesn’t matter if he’s insane or not, Mark David Chapman got a sentence that was basically like a high class life. He received special treatment and was proven not insane. I believe he should’ve either gotten life in prison or the death penalty. Although I don’t exactly agree with the death penalty, what he did was a crude thing. No one deserves to be murdered, and the fact that he did it for no reason other than to get attention, is absolutely

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The case of David McCallum who at the time of his charge was a sixteen-year-old boy was charged along with his friend Willie Stuckey who where charged for a kidnapping and murder. McCallum and Stuckey were found guilty of kidnapping and killing a young Queens’s man in 1986 and sentenced to 25 years for a crime he did not commit. He served a twenty-eight year sentence before being found not guilty and let out of prison. The main cause of the wrongful conviction was McCallum and Stuckey admitted kidnapping and killing 20-year-old Nathan Blenner and taking a joyride in his car. They quickly recanted but were convicted of murder.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    §§211.021 (2000) and 211.031 (Supp. 2003). He was tried as an adult. At trial the State introduced Simmons’ confession and the videotaped reenactment of the crime, along with testimony that Simmons discussed the crime in advance and bragged about it later. The defense called no witnesses in the guilt phase. The jury having returned a verdict of murder, the trial proceeded to the penalty phase.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a young boy john grew up never knowing his father while his mother Julia Lennon lived with her other children and husband which left John to be rasied by his aunt mimi and uncle. For instance " It was't that he was beung rasied by his aunt and uncle while his mother, never divorced from his father lived nearby with another man and their children" (Partridge 4). Over the years as john grew older and started attending school he later reilized that he was diffrent from others because of the way he thought. For example "It's the same problem I had when i was five : 'There is something wrong…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is John Lennon Unjust

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Despite all of this, no reason is an excuse to take somebody’s life. In 1957, Lennon and a man named Paul McCartney formed the Beatles, the greatest band in history in many people’s eyes. (nymag.com 1) However, when Lennon left the band in 1969, the fan were sad; not sad enough to listen to his solo albums. He started a solo career right after with his album Imagine.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is John Lennon Wrong

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In a recent interview for NBC they said “The reason for the crime, according to Mark David Chapman: “Attention, bottom line.” This goes to show that not even the killer had anything against Lennon, as it states later in the article “Chapman said he was living in Hawaii when he decided to target Lennon “because he was very famous”. Few people might argue that his assassination was justified simply because they are either delusional or crazy. As previously stated, he did nothing to provoke any such attack. No rational human being could justify his assassination.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ultimately the ethical decision to release the was significant in this case, but with an insanity plea that then lead to additional considerations regarding Colorado’s laws…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was found incompetent to stand trial and admitted into a mental hospital. He was tried once he gained competence two years later. Although he was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia at the time of the crime, Arizona only went by the second half of the M’Naghten rule, understanding that your actions are wrong, to determine insanity. Due to this Clark did not get the insanity plea and was sentenced to 25 years in prison. An appeal hearing was held in June 2006, stating that by Arizona eliminating the first portion of the M’Naghten rule it violated Clark’s due process rights.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Lennon had a huge impact on the world when he died. Jonh fighted a lot for world peace and did a lot of things for peace. John also inspired a lot of people to the rock scene. John Lennon protested against the Vietnam War and did want people to go the peaceful way. John was against Nixon and he said dont vote for Nixon to get peace.…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He declares his goal to be the catcher in the rye, one who prevents the young children from falling off a cliff when playing in the rye. Holden’s self-proclaimed deceitful nature, reckless behavior, and desire to save the young portray ineffective…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hinckley’s “reason” for trying to assassinate the than president Ronald Regan was that he was trying to get the attention of actress Jodie Foster. Lead psychiatric expert for the defense a Dr. William Carpenter concluded that “the defendant suffered from schizophrenia. He saw Hinckley has having four major symptoms of mental illness: an incapacity to have an ordinary emotional arousal," "autistic retreat from reality," depression including "suicidal features," and an inability to work or establish social bonds. So focused was he on achieving a "magical unification with Jodie Foster" that he didn 't see the consequences of his action for his victims” (Linder, 2008, section the trial). How the other hand, the government’s (prosecution) lead expert Dr. Park…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holden Caulfield Analysis

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Holden says that he wants to be “a catcher in the rye,” and he imagines himself standing at the edge of a cliff as children play around him. He would come out of somewhere and always catch them just before they fall off the cliff. Holden’s parents come home; Holden sneaks out to stay with his former teacher Mr. Antolini. Holden falls asleep but when he awakens he finds Mr. Antolini coming on to him so he decides to leave. Holden tells Phoebe that he is leaving; she tells him that she wants to go with him and becomes angry when he refuses.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapman had no reason to kill John Lennon. Lennon was a role model to millions of people worldwide, including Chapman. “Chapman appeared a normal, well adjusted boy, with a passion for the Beatles, and John Lennon in particular” (Crime and Investigation, 2). Chapman’s fascination with Lennon ended abruptly when John said, “We’re more popular than Jesus…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That’s all I’d do all day. I’d just be the catcher in the rye and all.” (pg 173) This quote relates to Holden trying to protect himself from growing up.…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Holden dreams of being the “catcher in the rye” and defend the “little kids playing some game” from falling off the cliff into the mature life, because Holden’s job is to “catch everybody” if they begin to stumble “over the cliff.” In comparison to the book, many other sources that cover the analysis on the Catcher in the Rye agree with the…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    214). According to his attorney, Ralph did not deserve a jail sentence, but rather should have been put in a psychiatric institution to assist with his mental disease. Also, the prosecution relied solely on the fear of the jury based on the fear of letting a criminal back on the streets sooner or later, or the fact that most mental illness cases are most common in use as mitigating factors in doling out sentences, which was not factual in the case of Ralph. Lastly, the court of law did not protect the rights of an individual battling with a mental disorder. The jury and court should have determined Ralph’s case with a lot of sensitivity and give a probable not guilty by reason of insanity as outlined by Bartol & Bartol (2011, p.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays