Marcus Tullius Cicero Analysis

Improved Essays
The Life, Thoughts, and Writings of Marcus Tullius Cicero In the article, “Opposing Viewpoints – The End of the Republic: Three Views”, the third selection of writing from Cicero. In his letter to his friend Atticus, Cicero speaks his mind about what he thinks of Caesar’s actions. A couple of distinct phrases within the article really peaked my interest. The following quote was the first thing that caught my attention: “Is it a Roman general or Hannibal we are talking of? Deluded wretch, with never in his [Caesar’s] life a glimpse of even the shadow of Good! And he says he is doing all this for his honor’s sake! Where is honor without moral good?” (Spielvogel). This quote indicated to me that Cicero heavily disagreed with the actions of Caesar …show more content…
Some of the famous philosophic writings include On the Laws, On the Republic, and On the Nature of the Gods. Cicero made the many speeches as a lawyer and as a Senator. About 60 of his speeches remain. The speeches provide insight into the cultural, political, social, and intellectual life of Romans. Many of his speeches also include descriptions of the corruption and immortality of the Roman elite class, the senatorial class. The category which includes the document Letter to Atticus, is Cicero’s roughly 900 letters (including some letters that were addressed to him). Most of Cicero’s letters were to his close friend Atticus or to his brother Quintius. Some letters to and from some other famous Romans, like Caesar, have also been preserved. Apparently it is important to exercise caution in drawing any conclusions from his letters about Cicero’s true moral beliefs, because a lot of them were written with a political agenda in mind, which may make them less truthful and straightforward (Clayton). Also, a very large portion of Cicero’s letters were, by no surprise, written out of his mood within the moment and he didn’t really consider that these letters would possibly be published someday. Therefore, the style of the letters is fairly relaxed and use familiar conversation

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Cicero, in his first Oratio in Catilinam, makes a clear distinction between the Roman deity Fortune and the inanimate, impersonal fortune to differentiate Catiline’s luck from his conspirators’ immorality. Cicero calls Catiline’s followers “abandoned by all of Fortune,” insinuating that the goddess Fortune, a famed Roman deity, judged these men so vile that she deserted them intentionally (“ab omni… Fortuna… derelictis”)(85). By proclaiming the name of the goddess and using “ab” to create an ablative of personal agent, Cicero suggests a choice made by a just, impartial deity to forsake Catiline's conspirators. On the other hand, Cicero notes that “fortune saved” Catiline without evoking personification of the goddess Fortune (“fortuna servavit”)(85).…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Everyone holds their own definition of what justice is, though the Merriam-Webster dictionary defines it, as the process or result of using laws to fairly judge and punish crimes and criminals (Merriam Webster). Although the idea of justice is connotative to good intention, Marcus Tullus Cicero author of The Defense of Injustice, shares a different perspective to the notion of justice. In a persuasive dialogue, Laelius gives Philus the challenge to defend the idea of injustice, in which Philius successfully accomplishes, establishing a powerful argument. Cicero insists that the idea of doing the right thing and having a good intention comes from human weakness and not from the idea of justice. He believes that the idea of justice…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony later claims, shortly before reading Caesar’s generous will, that he “must not read it”, as it was not for the Roman citizens to “know how Caesar loved you.” While the people of Italy are not described as especially dense, it appears that they are easily influenced in their judgement. Simply by using adverse phrasing in tempting to the citizens, he deeply affects the listeners and deters them from their original devotion to Brutus. Evidently, he was successful in this, as Antony was able to quickly and decisively clout the Romans’ judgement with poignancy, pathos, and emotional coaxing. As Mark Antony states, “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar……

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (III.2.33-34). In Brutus’s eyes Caesar did not love all the people of Rome and would have turned against them. Logos turns…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (III.2.94,97,100). Antony’s use of pathos, saying how good of a friend Caesar was and how much he cared for his people, and logos, recalling the times he saved prisoners and brought them home, sways the idea that killing Caesar was actually for the good of Rome. Now the view is that the murder was for the good of Brutus and the other senators so they can have more…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marcus Tullius Cicero was a well-known Roman senator who was exceptionally intelligent. Cicero was married to Terentia and had two children…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Shakespeare is regarded as the greatest writer in the English language. He is well-known for many of his works such as Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, etc. Along with these works is “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, Shakespeare writes two very well known speeches that are delivered by the characters Brutus and Mark Antony during the funeral of Julius Caesar. In speeches, Shakespeare uses ethos, pathos and logos on behalf of Mark Antony and Brutus to persuade the citizens of their own beliefs.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utopia Cicero and Plato were both great thinkers and both have a big influence on how some societies and governments are operated today. In his writing, “The Defense of Injustice”, Cicero talks about how the “justice” his society believes in is manufactured to work for self interest and not for the greater good. He uses a story where two characters Philus and Laelius argue about justice and injustice. He then goes on to talk about a single law that will never change and will be true for every nation: A law that comes from God and not following this law is sinful in any form. “The Allegory of the Cave” by Plato is similar to this in the fact that the people that gained wisdom by leaving the cave for the upper world would never look back…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to avenge Caesar, Mark Antony turns a shocked, confused crowd of mourners into an angry mob of rioters by using persuasive techniques. The main component of Antony’s speech, Pathos, appealed to the commoners by striking an emotional spot inside them, trying to turn the fickle crowd against Brutus. Antony displayed the persuasive technique of Pathos by repeating words, showing them Caesar’s body, and presenting Caesar’s will. In the beginning of Antony’s speech, he spoke of Brutus as an honorable man, but in this case he repeated the word, making the connotation of honorable negative.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He gradually works his way downward by first starting with the rulers of Rome who had many faults but were not completely destructive of Rome or her people. He mentions Tullus, “breaker of his country’s peace” (6.732), Ancus who is “given to boasting, even now too pleased with veering popularity’s heady air” (6.735-736), and the avenger Brutus who “will call for the death penalty in freedom’s name” (6.743) and is an “unhappy man” (6.744) with an “unmeasured lust for fame” (6.746). This description of flawed and imperfect leaders directly after the description of the epitome of a leader in Caesar Augustus creates an unmistakable and stark contrast in Roman history. Virgil is making the point that Caesar Augustus is the best leader in the history of Rome and, therefore, for the remainder of time, the Roman people will have to accept a leader with more flaws than…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reading On Duties written by Marcus T. Cicero described the responsibilities that a public official must acquire when being a public administrator. The author discusses the importance of having public administrators intelligent and capable of conducting the duties of the government. The preparation of individuals interested in government should be honorable according to Marcus. A. Cicero argued, “When anyone does undertake public business, he should remember to reflect not only on how honorable that is, but also on whether he has the capacity to succeed” (p. 23). The morality of public administrators as well as social justice and knowledge is described as the primary character that an official must endorse.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Republic Analysis

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He opposed Caesar and sided with Pompey and the senate during the Civil War. Caesar set himself as a dictator and Cicero didn’t like that he had considered himself a dictator. Cicero opposed Julius Caesar and when he spoke out about Caesar, Caesar found out and sent soldiers to arrest him so he fled Rome. It was obvious Cicero didn’t like the rule of one man and spoke strong about the nobility of a republican form of government in Rome. Therefore when Caesar announced his dictatorship it was obvious Cicero didn’t care for it.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Marcus Brutus is a powerful yet easily persuaded character whose distinct traits make him the tragic hero of the play. A tragic hero is a literary character that makes grave errors of judgment or has a fatal flaw that leads to their own demise. This description fits Brutus perfectly as he makes awful decisions throughout the story and is seriously flawed by his naïveté. However, Brutus still possesses the trait all tragic heroes must have: nobility. However, despite his good nature, his errors of judgment and naïve character conclude in his own suicide at the end of the…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays