Marco Polo, Bartolome De Las Casas, Olaudah Equiano

Superior Essays
The Different Meanings of Power

Marco Polo, Niccolò Machiavelli, Bartolomé de Las Casas, Olaudah Equiano, and the Signatories of The Declaration of Independence define ideas of power and difference through their personal narratives or texts and the intentions of their writings. Primary sources that will be explored in this essay are Marco Polo’s The Travels of Marco Polo (1298) translated by Thomas Wright and William Marsden, the Venetian, Machiavelli's The Prince (1532) translated by W.K. Marriott, Bartolome de Las Casas’s A Brief Account of the Destruction of the Indies (1532) translated by R.Hewson, The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano (1789) by Olaudah Equiano, and The Declaration of Independence (1776) by Signatories.
…show more content…
His audience members are directly for princess or rulers. Its for the leaders of the countries that have conquered them. He provides an example of Louis XII who planned to take over Italy, the people supported Louis because they believed he could help them obtain Lombardy through his intervention. However, once King Louis was in power, he made many mistakes in which came to loss of his position. Machiavelli explained there errors Louis had made, “he destroyed the minor powers, he increased the strength of one of the greater powers in Italy, he brought in a foreign power, he did not settle in the country, and he did not send colonies.” These were all mistakes that led to the loss of Lombardy and the fall of his reign. Machiavelli’s text maybe very helpful or advantageous to leaders; however, he has underemphasized the people and their impact on the leaders. Las Casas criticized the spaniards for brutalizing the natives of the New World (America). He presented the injustice and the killings of the innocents to rationalize the Spanish. He starts by discussing the natives and how welcoming they were towards the Spaniards; this gave the Spaniards easy access to take over. They would steal, rape, or take the people as slaves and would kill innocent children along the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In one section of the article, Vincent Barnett discusses some of the alternative ways that Machiavelli’s The Prince can be interpreted. One interpretation was that Machiavelli possibly intended for his writing to be satirical, because certain facts, such as how Machiavelli had a family, refute his statement from the pamphlet that he believes all humans are evil. Also, it is possible that Machiavelli didn’t actually agree with the ideas in his writing, but he only wrote those things to gain favor from the leaders of his time. These are just possibilities, but knowing about Machiavelli’s life and his situation are important in order to understand his motives for writing The Prince. Just like Machiavelli, present-day leaders and authors make…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature Of Indians Summary

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to de Las Casas, the key characteristics of the Indians are simplest, obedient, faithful, humble, patient, peaceful and calm. In the article, he writes that, “God has created all these numberless people to be quite the simplest, without malice or duplicity, most obedient, most faithful to their natural Lords, and to the Christians, whom they serve; the most humble, most patient, most peaceful and calm, without strife nor tumults; not wrangling, nor querulous, as free from uproar, hate and desire of revenge as any in the world” (Cobbs. 8-9). He thinks that Indians are nonviolent people and they are faithful to their natural Lords as well as the Christians. For example, de Las Casas uses “gentle sheep” (Cobbs.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While most Spaniards believed that the harsh treatment of the natives during the conquest of the Americas was necessary to accomplish the Spanish Imperial objectives in the region, there were many who opposed those treatments. Bartolomé de las Casas a Catholic priest, was the most eloquent critic of Spanish mistreatment of the New World’s native population (de las Casas, p.7). In his document, History of the Indies (1528), de las Casas aimed to inform the public back in Spain of the atrocities that occurred on the island of Hispaniola by Spanish “comendadors” and attempted to persuade them to stop such practices. When de las Casas arrived in the New World and in particular at the island of Hispaniola, present day Haiti, as a Christian missionary,…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The conquest of the Americas during the 15th and 16th centuries, as documented by Christopher Columbus and Bartoleme de Las Casas, was tale of hammer and nail. In both accounts the Natives were described as meek and docile, with little to no weaponry that could withstand Spanish attack. Both Columbus and Las Casas stated that the Indians were naive, lacking evil, and respectful, Las Casas even stating they were “weak and complacent”. In the eyes of these Spanish explorers, the Indians were malleable people, and would benefit from conversion to the Christian faith. Las Casas differs from Columbus, however, in his view of the Spaniards.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Las Casas felt that the Indians were being oppressed by the Spaniards who had settled in their land. On top of their freedom being denied, they were beaten and forced to work without pay. The land that had initially belonged to them were taken away. The Spaniards also brutally murdered the Indians. Las Casas explains that within 8 years the population had decreased from three million people to about two hundred thousand.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates Is No Prince Socrates and Machiavelli lived in a time of political and civil disarray and chaos. Their thoughts on political philosophy and theory are a product of the times in which they lived. Through interpretations of their own political climate, Socrates and Machiavelli produced two schools of political thought that are incredibly different and contrasting. Plato’s Apology and Crito and Machiavelii’s The Prince present these two vastly disparate ideologies.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Spaniards came to the New World in hopes of finding gold. Once they get here they realize there is not any, and the Spaniards realize they are going to have to work in order to survive and make money. They quickly force the Indian communities to work for them. The treatment of the Indians by the Spaniards was unimaginable and explained thoroughly by Las Casas who was a Dominican priest against this treatment. Religion played a major role in the treatment of the Indians and also later on in the Pueblo Revolt.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The exploration and domination of the New World by the Spanish during the 15th and 16th century have been interpreted as the result of groups of bloodthirsty soldiers wanting nothing more than gold in their rucksacks and kill counts in their heads. As history has made clear, Spanish priests were also important historical actors during this age of discovery who made it their task to convert the natives to Catholicism. The conquering soldiers physically torn at the Natives while, at the same time, the priests harmed the natives spiritually. The importance of history is that we can learn from the past to aid our future. In other words, does the blindness of Spanish culture while regarding the Natives justify the physical, social and religious destruction they caused to the Natives?…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The relationship between Christianity and how it shaped interactions between people from different parts of the world in the 1500s is a historically complex question and many conclusions can be drawn from it. Through the late 15th and early 16th centuries, European missionaries and colonizers greatly spread Catholic Christianity to the Americas and Africa. It is important to analyze why they did this why they felt such entitlement. Throughout history, it has been in the habit of the colonizers to believe they are inherently superior to the colonized. A very important issue resulted in a crisis of conscience in the 16th century Spanish Empire.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Intro After reading The Leviathan by Hobbes and the Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses I would argue that the two authors have a similar view on how fear is politically relevant. What makes fear relevant to Machiavelli and Hobbes is that they believe that fear is necessary for a sovereign or a prince to stay in power. The two authors also believe that it is needed to keep the subjects in check and to keep them complacent. Today however there are people who question if fear is politically relevant today.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An explanation that is potentially one of the more conventional validations of the relationship between Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses is reading The Prince as a manual for the founder of what would eventually emerge as a republic. Once the prince has established a foundation of the state, the republic that Machiavelli advocates for in the Discourses will become achievable and desirable. The Prince was written to establish a unified state; the republic in the Discourses will maintain that stable and unified state. Academic Leo Strauss explains that Machiavelli wrote the Discourses to promote the imitation of ancient republics. Machiavelli longed for the rebirth of ancient republicanism .…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” Machiavelli uses this analogy as an attempt to teach the masses how to embrace their human significance. Machiavelli wrote The Prince at a time where there was political unrest and confusion in Italy, which is why it can be interpreted in many different ways, such as a political satire or epilogue of his political views; however, while the content may be confusing the true meaning of The Prince is to be understood as a satire. Machiavelli is continuously sarcastic through out the course of the novel about the government standings and the changing world.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Prince, in contrast, is a tyranny and bares tension with republicanism. A tyranny is exactly what is identified as a bad counterpart in the Discourses. This distinction does strain the potential relationship between the two texts, yet this is only validated if the two texts are read in mutual exclusion and without the consideration of external historical…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays