Marbury Vs Madison Essay

Improved Essays
Marbury vs. Madison was one of the most defining cases for the Supreme Court because it introduced judicial review. There was a race for presidency, and as John Adams term was ending he passed the Judicial Act of 1801. This law let Adams appoint other federalists as an attempt of control over the federal judiciary system. Although it was signed and stamped, it was never delivered once President Thomas Jefferson took control of the office. Commissions were never sent out as commanded by Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, his secretary of state. One of the appointees by the name of William Marbury, who was appointed as the justice of peace (two other men also joined in), petitioned the Supreme Court for a legal order to show why he did not receive …show more content…
This statement makes a real assessment as to why these powers exist. If the Supreme Court can overrule laws, what makes their power and the current law final? Similar to how gay marriage was recently made legal in the U.S. it makes someone wonder why can’t the constitution be restructured into modern times so it appeals more to the people of today, and to shift the balance of power. Due to how the power is arranged in the law, there are many obstacles when it comes to basic human rights like marriage and waiting so long for changes to happen is nonsensical. Slavery took too long to end. If the final court can so easily make changes to the law, why can’t some of the things from the past be deemed unconstitutional? There are many issues today, for me importantly being church vs. state; religion did not originally have such a big impact in politics and law. Since religion is a freedom that’s individual, why is currency still printed with “in god we trust”. The decisions that are made by the court take years, and even though they seem like easy procedures of signing some papers, they aren’t easy decisions to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Essay

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1803 William Marbury sued John Madison for being denied the role of Justice of Peace and claimed that the executive branch was forcing actions on the other branches. Before Thomas Jefferson was elected into his role of Presidency, William Marbury had been appointed to be a Justice of Peace by John Adams, but the appointment process had not fully been completed. By that time Jefferson had been in his role of Presidency and Adam's role was terminated. Thomas Jefferson had then denied Marbury access to his role appointed by the previous President, even though William had been expecting a role. William Marbury brought the case to the Supreme Court, stating that not one branch of the government was allowed to force an action upon another branch.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under George Washington and John Adams federal spending and revenue rose substantially, however under Jefferson it flattened, this was because Jefferson ensured that increases in federal revenues went towards paying the debt rather than expanding the government. 3. John Marshalls final decision in the case of Marbury V. Madison greatly strengthened the judicial branch, because the final ruling in the case established the…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1803, Marbury v. Madison was sent to court and the long trial began. Many events had been leading up to the case that would change the United States government forever. Marbury v. Madison proved to be no ordinary case when it increased the powers of the judicial branch. The continuing expansion of the government forced the existence of the case to be debated. It was only a matter of time before the branches would increase in power.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the election of 1800, President John Adams realized he was losing to the Democratic-Republican candidate Thomas Jefferson. Fearing that the Federalists were going to become the minority party, Adams decides to appoint a substantial number of Federalists to the Justices of Peace in the closing months of his presidency. However, before all of the commissions could be sent out, Thomas Jefferson assumed the presidency on March 5th, 1801. Jefferson immediately notices all of the unsent commissions, and orders the new Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver them. William Marbury, one of Adam's Federalist appointees, noticed that he never received his commission.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marbury v. Madison was a result of the lame duck period, when the power shifted from the federalists when John Adams was president to Thomas Jefferson, a democratic republican. The night before Jefferson went into presidency, Adams appoints a whole load of new judges so federalists could still have some power. William Marbury was supposed to be one of these judges but was not appointed to be one in time because Jefferson became president. Marbury then asked the Court to issue a writ of mandamus to secretary of state, James Madison but Jefferson decided to withdraw all the new commissions and ordered Madison deny them. This called for John Marshall to rule on this argument.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout its long history, when the Court needed to affirm its legitimacy, it has cited Marshall's opinion in Marbury v. Madison” (McBride). This case answered the question that the Courts do have the authority to interpret the Constitution and declare acts by Congress and the President unconstitutional. When laws are in contrary to the Constitution, it is the duty of the Courts to review and resolve the issues and apply a decision correct to the law. Lastly, the case set a precedence and brought forward with emphasis that the Constitution is the law of the land and the Supreme Court decision is the final arbiter of the…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Provide a fully developed essay of at least 500 words, and cite sources used. Marbury versus Madison is considered the most important cases in the history of the Supreme Court. The case took place around from 1789 and lasted until 1803. The constitution called for three branches of the government: legislative, executive, and judiciary. Articles I and II covered legislative and executive.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Marshall served as chief judge from 1801 to 1835, and he was the greatest dominance to the Supreme Court that there was no judge can compare. At the outset of his tenure Judge, Supreme Court asserted its power by declaring an Act of Parliament was unconstitutional, that case was Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Marshall's decision in the dilemma seems no escape showed natural talent of his absolute. Marshall declared Section 13 of Act 1789 of Justice is unconstitutional because it empowered instance trial for the Supreme Court beyond the provisions in Article III of the Constitution. Thus, the power of the Supreme Court was reconsidered and decided the congressional legislation was unconstitutional had been set.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Marbury v Madison all began when President Adams in his last days as president. President Adams was in a frantic rush to send out appointments for justices of peace. He wanted to have as many federalist ally’s as possible so his opponent Jefferson would not be able to change the old ways. (Hess 62) In doing so he was down to the wire on his last day as president, his appointments were approved by the senate and just had to be delivered.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The institution of the Supreme Court is anti-democratic. They are the final decision makers and there is no check to their power. Yet their role in making changes to the constitution comes from some sort of injustice that makes us question how the text has been interpreted. A citizen must take legal action and go through an arduous process to reach the high court. This process is intentionally difficult so only matters that are truly perceived of as immoral and consist of enough social implications, will be heard.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court should be able to overturn unconstitutional laws that Congress has passed. There are many reasons to give the Supreme Court this power, first we need someone to enforce the fact that no law should violate the Constitution. Next, it helps balance the three branches of government, and lastly the Constitution puts judicial power into the Supreme Court and inferior courts. This power will stop substandard laws from getting passed, and will protect the structure of our government that is extremely based on the Constitution.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Marbury v. Madison case was important because it established the doctrine of the judicial review, and what happened in this case…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Three Branches

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Three Branches In order for the United State of America to have equal power, so that one person would not have more power over another. The Founding Fathers decided to write a constitution to divide the powers in to three branches. Each branches holds different types of responsibilities, but when they combine their powers, it will make sure the government is run smoothly and fairly, so that it is following the citizens’ rights. Each branches has an ability to keep the other two in check and that is how they would maintain balance amongst the three branches.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Eleventh Amendment

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Judiciary Can’t Have Too Much Power The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution, changed a portion of Article III, Section II of the U.S. Constitution. Even before ratification of the Constitution anti-federalists worried that Article III, Section II would interfere with the sovereignty of the individual states. The original Article stated that: the judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in law and equity, arising under this constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made under their authority; to cases between a State and Citizens of another State and between a State or the Citizens of it and foreign States. The anti-federalist believed this would allow the federal government to override the States right to not be subject to a suit without the States consent.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is the minds of powerful and brilliant thinkers from every era of history that have led to the world we live in today. James Madison made a positive impact on the United States through his many political actions. During the Constitutional Convention, Madison created the Virginia plan. While he was the secretary of state, he acquired the Louisiana Territory. While he was the fourth president of the United States, he lead the country defiantly against the British during the War of 1812.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays