He presumes that abundance of goods, easy access to schooling, and ever-ending expansion of technology has fabricated sluggish youths who have no desire to enlighten themselves from books or other mind-grappling sources of knowledge. Unfortunately, the surplus of technology and material gains has resulted in less active youths, but Bauerlein fails to discern whether laziness constitutes as being dumb. If they have the ability to critically think and memorize ample amounts of information, but choose not to divulge into this life, then are they guilty of being dumb? Although people might claim they are dumb for not choosing a path of knowledge; it is not relevant to the argument of whether our minds can learn and understand
He presumes that abundance of goods, easy access to schooling, and ever-ending expansion of technology has fabricated sluggish youths who have no desire to enlighten themselves from books or other mind-grappling sources of knowledge. Unfortunately, the surplus of technology and material gains has resulted in less active youths, but Bauerlein fails to discern whether laziness constitutes as being dumb. If they have the ability to critically think and memorize ample amounts of information, but choose not to divulge into this life, then are they guilty of being dumb? Although people might claim they are dumb for not choosing a path of knowledge; it is not relevant to the argument of whether our minds can learn and understand