Why Do Many Reasonable People Doubt Science Analysis

Improved Essays
We live in a time of great confusion and debate. While some loudly proclaim climate change a hoax, others just as strongly say it’s real. In the twentieth century scientists hypothesized that fats were bad for the body, while now they say the body requires some fats to stay healthy. How can we know if what is considered safe today won’t be dangerous in the future? In the article “Why Do Many Reasonable People Doubt Science,” Joel Achenbach states that the American public doubts and has an extent of fear towards scientists. According to Achenbach, people are resistant towards the science community because of internal and external factors. A few of the internal factors he remarks are: the tendency to follow the major, lack of trust, and using personal experience or experiences of people close …show more content…
Achenbach mentions in the article that “the science tribe has a long track record of getting things right in the end,” but he doesn’t point out that until they actually get it right, the public must endure the consequences of their mistakes. Similar to the example I mentioned earlier about fats, Achenbach mentions that “it’s safe to eat food containing GMOs,” because there is “no evidence that it isn’t.” He doesn’t know if in the future evidence will be found proving that GMOs have negative effects and thus these scientist’s hypothesized statements cause the public uncertainty. It was the same way with nuclear weapons testing, the dropping of the first ever bomb on the city of Hiroshima had exponential effects that lasted for years long after the bomb was dropped. Thousands of people died that day, while those injured had to live with this experience for the rest of their lives. This example clearly shows the side of science that Achenbach doesn’t mention at all in his article, the side of science that doesn’t bring improvement to but instead

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    For instance, she blames the challenges that result in misunderstandings and confusions of the public on matters of scientific developments to the difficulty that the scientific communities experience when finding appropriate terminology. In addition, the professor argues that the complex nature of modern science as another course of people’s misunderstanding of the advances being made in scientific fields. Question 3 In essence, Randall’s audience appears to share her warrants, owing to the fact that there is a significant level of misunderstanding of scientific developments. Therefore, the concerns raised by the author of the article are authentic, and they deserve to be addressed.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keith E. Stanovich, the author of “How to Think Straight About Psychology,” explains different aspects of psychology to his readers in the first chapter of his book. He starts off by stating how Sigmund Freud is a fraud when it comes to psychology. Although Freud’s work in psychology is so little, he is the reason why many people misunderstand psychology. Then the chapter begins to talk about how psychology is composed of different topics and studies, and when there are many different topics it is difficult to link all of the topics into one. When psychology is often discussed, many people do not consider it a science.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Why We Should Trust Scientists,” by Naomi Oreskes, the presenter describes what makes science so unique, and distinguishes it from other fields such as religion. Oreskes claims that science is an appeal to authority, but unlike other similar appeals, it is the collective authority of a group of people, somewhat like a community. Throughout her speech, she conveys to her audience different examples of historical figures who worked in science, and uses them as proofs to help understand the point that she is making. In doing so, she describes that what makes this specific field so special, is the fact that science itself, and the ways that one tries to test a theory on a specific subject are not related; but rather, as was said by Paul Feyerabend…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Mistrust of Science” by Atul Gawande is a commencement address at the California Institute of Technology. Atul Gawande calls upon the institutes graduates to take a stance and defend the common misconceptions and myths about scientific issues concerning today’s society. The commencement’s main goal was to use a logical thought process to defend the scientific evidence against common misconception. For example, Atul Gawande says “They deploy false analogies and other logical fallacies… when scientists produce one level of certainty; the pseudoscientists insist they achieve another.” Atul claims that pseudoscientists deploy a poor sense of logical reasoning to mislead the public, which cannot be backed up by hard scientific evidence.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One might overlook that Science and Technology go hand in hand. They function as a pair to create the world we live in today. Oscar Handlin shows us this in his writing, Science and Technology of Popular culture. He explores the depth of these and what misconceptions come along with them. The traditions of Science and Technology have been practiced for many years.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 16th and 17th centuries, scientists began to question the long held theories of science. This new period, known as The Scientific Revolution, brought controversial opinions of political and social views. Scientists flourished with a variety of concepts, complex as the Three Laws of Motion, or as simple as the Heliocentric Model. Although we still follow these theories and support the studies of science today, life wasn’t that easy back then. Scientists were affected by many aspects of society such as church criticism, gender discrimination, and supportive leaders.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Skorton, in the article “Why Scientists Should Embrace Liberal Arts”, argues that scientists must supplement their science and engineering education with a study of the humanities to effectively inform the populous. Through the humanities, Skorton believes scientists can develop a better understanding of the human conditions, thus better emotionally connecting with people lacking a scientific background. Skorton’s article contributes a perspective towards solving a larger problem of the drift between the scientific community and the general public’s perception of scientific truth, particularly the scientific truths that inform politically charged debates. Skorton effectively aggrandizes the scientific community as potential saviors of…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are Gmo Good Or Bad

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To be against genetically modified organisms, is being against the advancement of technology. Over the course of all history many ideas have been shut down before they’ve even seen the light of day, and unfortunately that could be the case for gmo’s. 88% of U.S. scientists say genetically modified foods are safe to eat, and only 37% of Americans agree. Rationally, GMO crops aren't inherently different from other breeding techniques that people already trust—so even though we can't know with 100% certainty that the plants won't have negative effects, there's also no reason to think that they will (Peters). People tend to give them a bad rap simply because they don’t further research them.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science and scientific investigators must doubt themselves and question everything, and this inquisitive behavior is shown by the great scientists in the past. Barry uses allusions to the works of famous scientists to show that even the greats from the past have the same characteristics of questioning everything that successful scientists today have. John M. Barry first alludes to a great psychologist from the nineteenth century named Claude Bernard who “said ‘science teaches us to doubt’” (Barry). By referencing Claude Bernard, Barry shows the audience that scientists doubting themselves is not a new concept.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Additionally, it is important that people understands that it is healthy to ask questions and raise concerns, but people need to learn that not every concern is valid. Skepticism is needed in a free society, and science can often only be conducted in a free society, but this does not mean we shouldn’t believe what the scientific community discovers about the world around us. Thus, the real solution is a free educated society. Thus, I would argue that the solution is not just making science “popular” by integrating into pop culture, but instead the solution is creating a better education systems in…

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He knows scientists’ hands are tied. There are a lot misinformation campaigns “based on bogus science or political agendas”, and scientists cannot diminish them. Skorton also recognizes that scientists are not rewarded for effective public communication; on the opposite, scientists may not be considered as “serious” scientists if they do so; therefore, scientists are not willing to communicate to the public. Furthermore, Skorton reveals that many scientists never received the proper liberal arts education that enables them to effectively communicate to the public. By showing his understanding toward scientists, Skorton again earns his intended audiences’ trust.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Specter’s TED Talk “The Danger of Science Denial,” is an argument on why the scientific method is great and why it is an important part of the society. According to Specter, science has been the transformative force, which has remarkably improved the society in the last thousands of years. He argues that this happens to be the best time in society, in terms of mobility, wealth, health, and opportunities. However, science has been at the center of increased suffering for billions of societies across the world, with the rise of hunger. He argues that science has led to the degradation of land, which has then led to suffering for some parts of the society.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is becoming a real issue in America. Not only does this effect research on GM food, but it hurts all scientific disciplines as…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While in the vice-president position of this association, Rowland developed a speech intended for the scientists willing to promote a more effective way of researching. This group consisted of scientists dedicated to improving the way scientific research was conducted in America. Rowland’s purpose for delivering this speech was to provide the indistinguishable evidence of wrongly-researched science that was concealed during the 19th century as a result of the working world. Ultimately, he wanted to encourage positive development towards the motives and ambitions of American science. In his speech A Plea for Pure Science, Rowland addresses the scarcity of “pure science” in the American community.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis: The Danger of Science Denial It is important to appreciate the current nature and status of the world because there are individuals who laid the appropriate foundation for it. As Michael Specter’s TED Talk on The Danger of Science Denial, he outlined the challenges that might emanate from science denial. There are reasons that ought to be checked critically since they affect the current and future generation and they include health, wealth, mobility, opportunity and declining rates of diseases. It is critically clear that Specter did an excellent job that the audience can relate to, he did this by discussing emphatically on important issues that affect the current world.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays