1. George Mann can defend his position with the ensuing points:
• The permission was given by the supervisor with the responsibility of picking a small lawn mower for the department.
• The employee didn’t go out purely for personal business; he had important work assigned to him.
• He can also argue that the payment cut for the permission given to the employee is not already mentioned in their longstanding policy.
2. Sally can defend her position with the following points:
• As per the policy, whenever an employee leaves the office premises the employee must punch the cards. But, due to the negligence of Mr. Mann the employee has to suffer as well.
• Mr. Mann would have allowed the employee to punch the card and informed him about the office
• The permission was given by the supervisor with the responsibility of picking a small lawn mower for the department.
• The employee didn’t go out purely for personal business; he had important work assigned to him.
• He can also argue that the payment cut for the permission given to the employee is not already mentioned in their longstanding policy.
2. Sally can defend her position with the following points:
• As per the policy, whenever an employee leaves the office premises the employee must punch the cards. But, due to the negligence of Mr. Mann the employee has to suffer as well.
• Mr. Mann would have allowed the employee to punch the card and informed him about the office