Manifest Destiny Analysis

Better Essays
The United States was developed both geographically and socioeconomically through Indian Removal. The use of force propelled a capitalist society in which taking what we want is not only accepted, but encouraged. This led to the idea of Manifest Destiny. Manifest Destiny is the belief that Americans are superior to others and are morally obligated to expand the territory from coast to coast. Colonist believed the best way to gain land was to remove the Indians because of the mindset of Manifest Destiny. The ideology of Manifest Destiny led to the spread of colonists into Mexican territory, ultimately leading to the expansion of the United States. The colonists believed that anything can be property, including people. Race discrimination played …show more content…
John O’Sullivan said, “Our Manifest Destiny to overspread the continent allotted by providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions. Yes, Manifest Destiny.” This shows the mindset of Americans at that time. Abraham Lincoln was against war, but not against expansion. Newspapers said the government knew Mexico would not do anything so they took advantage of it. Colonists believed they were superior to Mexicans even though the Mexicans saw them as equals. The character of the people of the United States was changing. The principles that our forefathers created was slowly diminishing. Colonist continued to expand into Mexican territories, settling the stage for a conflict over the state’s status and for the eventual war against Mexico. Mexico abolished slavery in 1829. This abolishment threatened slaveholders who wanted to expand their territory. The expansion by Jefferson and Jackson, disregarded race equality and brought forth the cruelty of American expansionist. James K. Polk did the same thing. The acquisition of California was his main objective. He obtained California by signing “The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, signed February 1848” setting the boundary of Texas at the Rio Grande and ceded New Mexico. Polk ignored race equality. The men that Polk sent “lost all respect for Mexican’s rights and were willing to be an instrument for Mr. Polk for pushing our boundary as far west as possible.” Racial inequality played a huge part in the expansion of the United states because people like Polk and Jackson who pushed other races off the land they

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    President Polk was known as “Polk the Purposeful” his objective was to expand the nation (The American). The United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico for the act was hypocritical of American ideals, fought for trivial goals of a tyrant that were executed in a manner that opposed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness which were established in the Declaration of Independence. The first inalienable right introduced, is that of preserving life. It is well established that war is a poor method of preserving life. Yet, President Polk still uses the loss of life as a reason to fight.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Polk took presidency in 1845, he made the acquisition of California known as a proposition he intended to complete while in office. He was known as a model of manifest destiny, an impulsive expansionist who desired the western pacific ports and territory for the states, despite the Mexican Republic owning the land. The Mexican government denied Polk 's request to purchase the land, and as a result Polk appointed troops to the disputed lands between the Nueces River and the Rio Grande. An African American Newspaper, "The National Era", saw this idea of manifest destiny as an act of war, stating that the slaves could "lift [their] exulting eyes...your white masters have new victims found." The slaves felt that the American people would do nothing to stop at acquiring the new land, even if it led to war.…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The conflict between the Americans and Mexicans led to war. A quick war was fought and Mexico lost, as terms of their surrender Mexico essentially gave the United States the West Coast, which includes California, New Mexico, and Arizona. The war between the Mexico and United States could be connected to Manifest Destiny because people in Texas did not want to abide by the Mexican laws because they felt they did not have to follow because it was not in God’s will. For Manifest Destiny gave them the right to settle as far west as they want and not follow any other rules except for America, because America was permitted by God to settle west. Manifest Destiny and westward expansion was also a political factor because it allowed for President James Polk to come to power, and spur on westward expansion.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    was not justified in going to war with Mexico because the U.S. had stolen their land, Broke their rules, and provoked the war in the first place. The Manifest destiny of the United States had made them think like they needed California and Texas, which they had stolen from Mexico. Mexico had attacked first, but the whole reason they had done that was because President Polk had provoked the war between them. The U.S. had invaded Texas and invaded California, stealing it and leaving Mexico in ruins. In the modern day we still have a bad relationship with Mexico because of our lives and laws that are…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    That exact attitude that the Americans had against the Mexicans is the same exact attitude that the settlers had against the Indians during the move west. They thought that the Indians were so much lower, they did not think that the Indians were as superior as they were. The indians were moved and the land was to go the the settlers who deserved and would use it better. Because of this fact, the the thought of the Manifest Destiny is what helped caused the western expansion of, what is now, the United State of…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Americans did not think of themselves as colonizers. They fear minority groups, such as the Mexicans, as being rights-holders of their own land. With the annexation of Texas, the Mexicans thought of that as an act of war. President James K Polk tried to purchase lands from Mexico, but they declined his offer. He tested Mexican troops by placing U.S. troops onto boundary zones causing Mexico to open fire on May 9, 1846.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Before the War of 1812 Native Americans separated into two main different sides the called the“Accommodationists” and the “Traditionalists”. The Accommodationists agreed with the white settlers and called for change in Native American ways, they wanted the industrialization of the land, and sought out innovative technologies. While the Traditionalists called for purity of Native American culture, and identity, thus completely disavowing the white settlers and their new technologies. Tecumseh and his brother Tenskwatawa both being “Traditionalists” called for the Union of Native Americans nations, to unite and resist against the white settlers which were taking their land forcibly. Tecumseh a skilled politician and an exceptional War Chief believed that the best way to defeat the white settlers was to wage a war against them, without the support of anyone.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When he realized this strategy was failing (due to civilian aide to the resistance), Lincoln came to a “radical” conclusion that he must shift to a total war strategy, and destroy slavery to “…create a new birth of freedom in order to preserve the Union”. The total war strategy destroyed the slavery institute by cutting off its resources, equipment and food. McPherson discussed that from Lincoln’s perspective there had been a shift in the relationship between liberty and property in America. The constitution states that “…all men are created equal”. Lincoln interpreted that the word “men” included Negros.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 1829, American settlers began to reside in Mexico’s territories in the southwest, disregarding their customs and laws. American colonists in Texas protested Mexican rule, sparking the Texas Revolution in 1835. Soon after, Mexican dictator Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna attacked Alamo and won, but the Treaty of Velasco gave Texas independence and created the border between Texas and Mexico (Berkin 314). Unfortunately, Mexicans wanted renegotiation of the treaty, threatening war. On April 22, 1846, Mexico announced that its territory had been invaded and declared war.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This would only lead to the Native Americans accumulating anger and revenge towards the new nation. The influence from the United States would also ignited their actions towards Mexico as they sought to hurt and wound it. For example in the article “Independent Indians and the U.S- Mexican War” Brian Delay says that “Comanche’s, Navajos, and Kiowa’s attacked Northern Mexican Settlements, invaded ranches and stole cattle” (35). This was beneficial to the U.S because it caused Political division between Mexicans. It left confusion between Mexican’s deciding whether or not they can really have control over these indigenous territories.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays