Mandatory Sentencing And Mandatory Disparity Summary

According to The Yale Law Journal article titled, “Mandatory Sentencing and Racial Disparity: Assessing the Role of Prosecutors and the Effects of Booker,” by Sonja Starr and M. Marit Rehavi. In the Supreme Court case, United States v. Booker, regarding sentencing guidelines, a federal district court judge enhanced Booker’s sentence based on the facts the judge determined. Booker appealed the enhancement as in violation of his Sixth Amendment rights. In another case, according to sentencing guidelines. Because of this case, it is in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury to allow a judge to enhance a sentence using facts not reviewed by the jury (Starr & Rehavi, 2013).
According to the assigned text, minimum sentencing for