Mandatory Public Service In The United States

George Washington said, “When we assumed the soldier, we did not lay aside the citizen,” meaning that one who participated in public service, including the military, was often the common man, usually a farmer or worker. In the United States, many debate whether there should be mandatory public service. Mandatory public service is a widespread topic, while in many other countries, mandatory service is a normalcy. In South Korea, every male of legal age is required to serve 2 years in the military; if deemed unfit for military service, they must spend 2 years in civil service. Many other countries such as Israel require public, mostly military, service, as well. Mandatory public service in the United States should not generally be required, unless under special circumstances,
The idea of liberty and freedom is a very widespread and popular one in the United States. Many, and rightfully so, do not want to be forced to work, or anything at all for that matter. This can also affect many citizens that already have pre-existing pressure or an extensive workload on their hands, such as college, a demanding occupation, or family or financial emergencies. Also, if public service was mandatory, and the citizen performing the service does not willingly do the job, the genuity and heart of the work …show more content…
The main one being anyone who has been convicted of a crime. Depending on their charges and age, convicts should spend a certain amount of time serving the public, including the military if their crime was extreme. Anyone who often is doing misconduct in the workplace or educational facility should also be required to do various local services such as trash management and construction. Many that do not support mandatory public service often do agree with this. The idea of helping one’s community is based around a moral obligation, therefore inmates and those who oppose basic rules should definitely