Against Mandatory Minimums

Improved Essays
Several decades ago the United States government created a set of mandatory minimum sentencing laws to help fight crime in the country. These laws require that judges sentence offenders of certain crimes for at least a minimum amount of years. Mandatory minimum sentences were created for a variety of crimes, but Robert NeSmith, editor-in-chief of the Law and Psychology Review of the University of Alabama Law School writes that the majority of federal prisoners is incarcerated for drug related cases pertaining to mandatory minimums (NeSmith 254). The system of mandatory minimum drug sentencing currently enforced by the United States federal government has failed to provide negative reinforcement and proven ineffective in assigning just punishment …show more content…
First, mandatory minimums limit judicial discretion and constitute too general a punishment for similar offenses without consideration of the different circumstances surrounding each case. Evan Bernick, Assistant Director of the Center for Judicial Engagement at the Institute for Justice and former Visiting Legal Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, and Paul Larkin, Senior Legal Research Fellow for the Heritage Foundation and former counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee wrote that “statutes imposing mandatory minimum sentences result in arbitrary and severe punishments that undermine the public’s faith in America’s criminal justice system”. To illustrate their point, Bernick and Larkin bring up the case of a financially desperate single mother who experienced the severity of this sentencing practice. The woman received a 10 year prison sentence after a stranger paid her to mail a package that she didn’t know contained 232 grams of crack cocaine. She had no previous criminal history (Bernick and Larkin). Such an occurrence is immoral and cannot be tolerated. Without accounting for the details of each case, mandatory minimum laws automatically sentence offenders a certain amount of years. This system is not effective in distributing just and deserved sentences. Only a qualified federal judge can study …show more content…
There are aspects of mandatory minimums which suggest a racial imbalance in the sentencing of prisoners. The Anti-Drug Abuse Act created the “100 to 1” disparity for crack versus powder cocaine abuse necessary for minimum sentencing. According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), “possession of five grams of crack cocaine would mandate the same minimum sentence as 500 grams of powder cocaine” (“U.S. Supreme Court Weighs...”). Interestingly, the ACLU also writes that in recent years “African Americans constituted more than 80 percent of those sentenced to federal prison for crack cocaine offenses, even though two-thirds of crack cocaine users are white or Hispanic” (ACLU). While the 100 to 1 ratio was reduced in 2010 with the passing of the Fair Sentencing Act, there is still a significant difference for requirements on crack versus powder offenders (“The right choices”). Mandatory minimums limit judicial discretion and give a heightened amount of power to prosecutors, who can decide whether to file formal charges against the apprehended offenders. The fact that the majority of crack offenders sentenced are African Americans despite representing a minority of those who use the drug exhibits racially discriminatory tendencies by prosecutors in the sentencing of criminals. Once again, returning to judges the supervised discretion to sentence criminals would

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Crime In Prison

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Americans today live in a country overflowing with more prisoners than ever, yet crime has been dropping since the late twentieth century. In fact, from 1980 to 2008, the number of people incarcerated in America quadrupled from about 500,000 to 2.3 million people (Criminal 1). There are several factors contributing to this problem. In recent years, America has taken new approaches to crime, such as the “War On Drugs” and the “Three Strikes” law. These approaches have drastically increased the prison population, to the point that 1 in 31 adults, or 3.2% of the population, will spend some time in prison in their lifetime (ibid).…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mandatory Minimums

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is achieved by requiring judges to sentence anyone convicted of specific crimes with no less than the predetermined minimum amount of time in prison, regardless of circumstance. Minimum sentences can range from thirty days to life in prison, depending on the crime committed; however, it is highly controversial whether or not the minimums are always proportionate to the crime (U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Provision). Mandatory minimums have been placed on a variety of offences including certain gun and weapon related crimes, sex crimes, identity theft, as well as many others. One of the most common examples of mandatory minimums, and possibly the most highly debated, are mandatory minimums set on drug related crimes, for example, being caught with 1gm of LSD or 100 marijuana plants could mean a minimum of five years in prison (U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Provision).…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    80 percent of the individuals sentenced under this statute are black, while two-thirds of the individuals who use crack-cocaine are white and Latino (Morris, www.civilrights.org). And according to an article in the Yale Law Journal, black people are arrested at higher rates than whites even though they “self-report drug use and drug dealing at a equivalent or lower rates” (Starr and Rehavi, 36). Moreover, the same study found even more convincing evidence: black men are “nearly twice as likely to be charged with an offense carrying a mandatory minimum sentence” (Starr and Rehavi, 28). These percentages being what they are, it is beyond dispute that racial biases influence how this law and other laws are applied.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result of the War on Drugs and latent racism in the justice system, in his lifetime, one out of every three black males can expect to be incarcerated. (ACLU, 2015) In spite of the fact that blacks and whites use drugs at approximately the same rate, blacks are incarcerated at ten times the rate of whites. One of the most obvious examples of this institutionalized racism is the sentencing structure for cocaine throughout much of the 1980’s and 1990’s. The sentencing structure for crack cocaine, favored in the inner city, and powdered cocaine, favored in the relatively affluent suburbs, provides a clear example.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In recent years, as, largely because of the heroin epidemic, attitudes towards drug use have shifted, America has stepped towards taking a “public health” approach to ending drug use. If the government continues to address drug use and abuse as the public health crisis it is, the issue of mass incarceration can be effectively tackled. The “War on Drugs” has primarily been responsible for the dramatic increase in the number of Americans under the control of the criminal justice system, with one in every 31 adults in prison or under parole or probation today. Effectively, national drug policy has encouraged police officers and prosecutors alike to go after low level drug offenders and has done very little to curb addiction and stop drug use (73). Consequently, any attempt to decrease America’s prison population and fight mass incarceration will have to drastically change the way in which substance abuse is addressed by the government.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the many ways that our criminal justice system demonstrably targets minority groups can be seen in the way we prosecute cocaine drug offenders. The Anti-Drug Abuse Act was passed by Congress in 1986, in response to the increased usage of cocaine around the nation. However, this act mandated criminal penalties for the possession of crack cocaine that were much more severe than that of powder cocaine. The possession of 500 grams of powder cocaine yields a five-year mandatory minimum sentence for a first offense; yet it takes merely 28 grams of crack cocaine to prompt the same sentence (Riley). This is notable because when this act was established, African Americans were more likely to possess crack cocaine, whereas powder cocaine offenders were more commonly white (Riley).…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With how controversial plea bargains can be for defendants’ fates, looking at the use of plea bargains in federal crack cocaine sentences is examining two levels of the American criminal system that is unjust for many. It was in 2007 when the U.S. Sentencing Commission, after “lobbying Congress in vain for ten years to remedy the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine offenses” (Kosman 786), successfully added a ‘crack amendment’ to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The amendment attempted to decrease the sentences of some defendants who had been convicted of crack cocaine offenses, and the Sentencing Commission was able to make the policy retroactive, so that they could take another look at those who were sentenced unjustly.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Criminal sentences for various drug offenses show the disproportionate effects of the War on Drugs and Crime on African Americans. Crack cocaine and powder cocaine have the exact same sentences for varying weights. 5 grams of crack cocaine is a mandatory five-year sentence while 500 (five hundred) grams of powder cocaine gets the exact same sentence. (Rosich) Crack cocaine distribution is more prevalent in the African American communities while powder cocaine is found in more affluent communities. The NAACP crime statistics also show that African Americans make up more than 80% of the people sentenced under the federal mandatory minimums for crack cocaine and they also serve longer sentences for their drug offenses than whites.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States, we see minimum harsh punishments given to drug criminals because the court system, in order to save money and other resources, doesn’t want to hear the drug court cases. When drug cases appear in court, it is up to the judge to decide the sentencing for the criminal. Many judges are awarding these criminals with a minimum harsh sentencing right away, making everything easier for the courts by not even having the case go to court. According to the book, The New Jim Crow, written by Michelle Alexander, “‘The value of a mandatory minimum sentence lies not in its imposition, but in its value as a bargaining chip to be given away in return for the resource-saving plea from the defendant to a more leniently sanctioned charge’”…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Notably, Cassell is not alone in the quest to reestablish how minimum mandatory sentencing is carried out and in some circumstances, avoided completely. Professor William G. Otis is a law professor at Georgetown University and former federal prosecutor who served as Special Counsel Member to President George H. W. Bush. In a similar tone to Cassell, Otis in his article "Should Mandatory Minimum Laws Be Repealed?" explores the concept of minimum mandatory sentencing from the perspective of the federal legislature’s lack of faith in the ability of state judges to uniformly get sentencing right when offenders were found guilty of carrying crime. As a direct result of such legislation and as explored above, thousands of non-violent, first time…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The research attempts to ascertain the impact that mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines have had on the criminal justice system as a whole in the United States. With its advent, mandatory minimum sentences have arguably had an economic impact on the justice system, particularly in corrections systems. Due to the fact that there are now more people being incarcerated for longer periods because of these sentencing guidelines, prisons are bearing an increasing cost for housing these inmates. Another factor that the research looks into is the inequities that are inherent when sentencing a non-violent offender with a sentence that is as stringent if not more so than those who have committed violent felonies. The repercussions these guidelines…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mass incarceration is ideally a part of American history. The increasing number of the prison population is alarming contrasting to the decrease of crime in the United States. The Caging of America depicts the relationship between mass incarceration and racism and mass incarceration and the crime rate. Gopnik shows that during the period of which incarceration rates were going up in the entire country, the crime rate was dropping, particularly in New York, therefore showing the cause of the crime fall had no linkage with prison over population. Gopnik sheds light to high rates of incarceration and the fact that incarceration should not be a method of crime control.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Until we get this right the prison population here in the United States will continue to grow, there will always be criminals but the number of them would significantly dwindle if we sought to improve opportunities across the board. According to personal knowledge as well as the article the race that is disporportunetly impacted by the Mandatory Minimum are “Blacks”. Do Blacks commit more crimes or are they sentenced more frequently and with harsher sentences than those that are White? If that statement is true it would seem that there is some sort of policy that has been put in place by people in order to continue the plight of African Americans, With broken homes and poverty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sentencing in the criminal justice system shows how racism operates. Skin color makes a huge difference. African Americans disproportionately receive more mandatory sentences compared to whites and the death penalty. “On average, black men spent almost 20 per cent more time in prison between December 2007 and September 2011. In addition, white men were more likely to serve sentences below the sentencing guidelines while black men were 25 percent less likely, according to the commission”(Duke).…

    • 1811 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are 242 million adults in the US currently. That’s 242 million people living their life - getting married, working at their dream job, having children, buying their first house. 242 million people who, in this country, have the freedom to live whatever kind of life they want.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays