Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Guidelines

Decent Essays
Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Guidelines: Mandatory minimum sentence refers to the fixed sentence of a crime that a judge is forced to deliver. In 1986, Congress enacted mandatory minimum sentencing laws. This was to impose the mandatory minimum sentence that a person would receive for the offense committed. A mandatory minimum sentencing guideline requires for a judge to hand down sentences for a certain amount of time. For certain crimes, there are criminal sentencing guidelines, this gives the judges a certain discretion to make sure that the crime fits the punishment and that the offender severe that punishment no matter elements may exist. When it comes to mandatory minimum sentences this may apply to many violent or drug-related crimes,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This clearly goes against the principle of the rule of law in that the mandatory sentences lead to an injustice within the criminal justice system, where the judge is not…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The California Three Strikes Law is an example of a mandatory sentencing policy. The law states that a person who commits a serious felony after two or more “strikes” will be sentenced to minimum of twenty-five years to life in prison. The “seriousness” of the felony is a new consideration that was implemented in 2012 (Couzens & Bigelow, 2012, "California's Three Strikes Sentencing Law"). Prior to the amendment, the law was applicable to ANY felony offense that was considered a third “strike.” This law has lead to the subsequent influx of non-violent prisoners that have engulfed the California prison system.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the most recent couple of years the verbal confrontation about whether obligatory sentencing ought to be nullified, and judges utilizing their own carefulness ought to happen has turned into a well known dialog in the United States. I see upsides and downsides for both sides. Mandatory least have filled the correctional facilites and penitentiaries with an excess of peaceful, first time guilty parties which brings about prison/jail packing and more obligation. President Obama expressed in a discourse "We have to lower long obligatory least sentences or dispose of them totally. " Opponents of compulsory least sentences contend that: Minority litigants are excessively detained contrasted with Caucasian respondents under the compulsory least…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A jury may also exercise the sentencing guidelines are usually imposed by the judge in most cases, but sentencing or it can be mandated by a statue; such as, mandatory prison sentence for certain crimes. There are various forms of sentences that are to be reviewed: concurrent and consecutive sentences, good time, sentencing sanctions, sentencing models, indeterminate sentences, determine sentences, structured sentences, feral sentencing guidelines, mandatory minimum sentences, and that of the three-strikes laws. The issue with concurrent and consecutive sentences is that concurrent sentences allow for than one sentence to be served at the same time as the others, while consecutive sentences only allow for one sentence to be served at a time, this is good in the case that there…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Polly Klaas Trial

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is superseded by AB 2716, which increases the minimum time served to 85 percent of the sentence for violent felonies. The three-strikes law states that the most severe prison terms are reserved for those who have previously committed "serious" or "violent" felonies. In general, California law defines violent felonies as those that cause injury to the victim or threaten the victim with a deadly weapon (for example, murder and voluntary manslaughter, mayhem, most forcible sexual offenses, and some categories of robbery, assault, and burglary). Serious felonies include all violent felonies, plus others where there is a potential for injury to the victim (for example, arson and the remaining categories of robbery, assault, and…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harsh minimum sentencing practices around drug offences exist because of the Reagan administration’s rhetoric that blamed drugs as the primary cause of violent crime in the US during the 1980s. Prior to Reagan’s “War on Drugs” era, drug crime in the US was relatively minor, however, beginning in 1980, the number of prisoners in jail for drug related offences skyrocketed. While there were just 41,100 of these prisoners in 1980, by 2010 that number had tripled, an increase of 1,100%. One of the biggest reasons for this seemingly outrageous increase is mandatory minimums, a system devised to enact harsher sentences for first time offenders, with the goal of making them reluctant to commit the same crime again. In her book, The New Jim Crow, professor…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sentencing Proposal

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages

    738 (2005), that the mandatory nature of the sentencing guidelines subjected them to the jury trial requirements…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Sentencing Guidelines took effect in November 1987, defendants across the country began filing constitutional challenges to the guidelines. By 1988, 200 district court judges would rule the guidelines unconstitutional while 120 would rule the opposite (Nagel, 1990). In an important ruling in 1989, the Supreme Court upheld their constitutionality in Mistretta v. United States where the sentencing crisis was resolved and marked an era of determinate sentencing for years to come. With over 200 district courts challenging the Guidelines in whole or in part based on alleged violation separation of powers, the due process rights of offenders and excessive-delegation arguments, it easily survived the constitutional scrutiny for the next…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mandatory minimum sentencing also indirectly prevents compromise in sentencing. This is because with minimum sentencing either the defendant receives full punishment for the crime or they come clean. Due to this the defendant will put up stronger resistance against the prosecution because their intent is to come clean instead of compromising for a smaller punishment (Mueller, 1992). This will lead to prosecution teams across the country demanding greater amounts of funds to successfully win cases against defendants. Long-term sentences have a costly impact on the judicial process.…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mandatory Minimums

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is achieved by requiring judges to sentence anyone convicted of specific crimes with no less than the predetermined minimum amount of time in prison, regardless of circumstance. Minimum sentences can range from thirty days to life in prison, depending on the crime committed; however, it is highly controversial whether or not the minimums are always proportionate to the crime (U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Provision). Mandatory minimums have been placed on a variety of offences including certain gun and weapon related crimes, sex crimes, identity theft, as well as many others. One of the most common examples of mandatory minimums, and possibly the most highly debated, are mandatory minimums set on drug related crimes, for example, being caught with 1gm of LSD or 100 marijuana plants could mean a minimum of five years in prison (U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Provision).…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    C. (2015). TOUGH ON CRIME OR TOUGH LUCK FOR THE INCARCERATED? EXPLORING THE ADVERSE PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCING AND PUSHING FOR ACTION. Law & Psychology Review,…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Sentencing Project, which is a non-profit organization that promotes reduced reliance on incarceration and increased use of more effective alternatives to deal with crime, states that the United States correctional system of the past thirty years has been characterized by a population increasing the exponentially in response to changes in policy towards mandatory minimum and determinate sentencing (Sentencing). In other words, individuals convicted of a crime today are more likely to be sentenced to incarceration and spend longer terms in prison, than their counterparts in previous decades (Sentencing). In 2002, state and federal prison and local jail populations exceeded 2 million, a trend that has contributed to prison overcrowding and has overwhelmed state governments with the burden of funding this rapidly expanding penal system (Sentencing). These changes in policy have resulted in the reality that prisons today are filled with large numbers of non-violent and drug…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The research attempts to ascertain the impact that mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines have had on the criminal justice system as a whole in the United States. With its advent, mandatory minimum sentences have arguably had an economic impact on the justice system, particularly in corrections systems. Due to the fact that there are now more people being incarcerated for longer periods because of these sentencing guidelines, prisons are bearing an increasing cost for housing these inmates. Another factor that the research looks into is the inequities that are inherent when sentencing a non-violent offender with a sentence that is as stringent if not more so than those who have committed violent felonies. The repercussions these guidelines…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Penalties such as the three strikes, zero tolerance and mandatory sentencing have resulted in lengthier, and more severe punishments. This in turn, has affected the government on all levels as these policies have become adopted; there has been increased amounts of arrests, capital punishment, and racial profiling in more recent events. With this information in mind, it is plain to see that there is…

    • 1092 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Sentencing Essay

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The criminal justice system maintains different goals when attempting to correct deviant and illicit behavior. In accordance to the sentencing guidelines established by United States Sentencing Commission (2011), punitive sentences are to incorporate a purpose for the sentence. Criminal sentencing can be categorized into six areas with distinctive goals: general and specific deterrence, incapacitation, retributive, rehabilitative, and equity/restitution. The sentencing goals are not exclusive and at times overlap in achieving its purpose. Furthermore, one goal is not better than another, but rather one would be more applicable in certain situations than another.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays