Mandatory Minimum Sentences In Jail

Improved Essays
Mandatory Minimum Sentences are over exaggerated and harsh sentences criminals have to follow while they are in jail. This all started to prevent and stop crime for possession of any and all drug possession. Many victims are the cause of Mandatory Minimum Sentences sadly, which causes many problems dealing with family abandonment, budget expenses, or prison overcrowding. The amount of individuals that go to jail are more than any other prison because half of them are filled with people who didn’t do anything to hurt themselves, others or society around them. Although mandatory minimum sentences stop crime and arrest criminals, it actually puts innocent who don’t deserve such harsh sentences in jail for unwarranted amounts of time. When …show more content…
Holder explains the prisons budget is costing the problem, “The over reliance… not just financially untenable, it comes with human and moral costs… impossible to calculate.” (Brown, 1) Federals spend all the money on prisons when they should be spending it on education, healthcare, or medical; which is important to the world. Another issue is the harsh sentences criminals receive in jail, “Currently an individual convicted, distributing 280 grams of crack or 1 kilogram… recieves… sentences of 10 years in federal prison.” (Brown, 1) Non-violent criminals receive a greater number of sentences than violent criminals, such as kidnapping 2nd degree, manslaughter 1st degree with a firearm, assault, robbery or burglary. Problems like this cause the system of what should be right turn out wrong. Sadly, such violent crimes including some of those and more won’t be looked over twice unless they prove them wrong of the expected …show more content…
Moreover, there is evidence that says it decreases drug possession and violence, federal judges can argue otherwise. Often, innocent people go to jail for harmless acts for an unreasonable amount of time in jail, for a one time use or a non-violent act of drug use. If federal court systems continue laws of Mandatory Minimum sentences, they need to question and use evidence to support whether the individual is really guilty or innocent. Sadly, the prosecutors might not understand what goes through a potential criminals mind when being interrogated for a crime that wasn’t even a crime. Today, Mandatory Minimum Sentences might not be commonly used in everyday speech, but just because it’s not mentioned in the newspapers or on a flashing ad that comes up on your computer screen doesn’t mean it still doesn’t exist today. The problem keeps evolving as we do which not only causes issues for the federal court system and how they run their jobs each and every day, but also the criminals that are being accused for such acts that had no effect whatsoever. However, in many articles and even the current political debate of 2016 to 2017, Mandatory Minimum Sentences is still mentioned even of today. It may not be spoken out loud, but it is thought of every single

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the United States, we see minimum harsh punishments given to drug criminals because the court system, in order to save money and other resources, doesn’t want to hear the drug court cases. When drug cases appear in court, it is up to the judge to decide the sentencing for the criminal. Many judges are awarding these criminals with a minimum harsh sentencing right away, making everything easier for the courts by not even having the case go to court. According to the book, The New Jim Crow, written by Michelle Alexander, “‘The value of a mandatory minimum sentence lies not in its imposition, but in its value as a bargaining chip to be given away in return for the resource-saving plea from the defendant to a more leniently sanctioned charge’”…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Commerce law assessment task 3- Lachlan O’Malley Mandatory Sentencing in New South Wales 1. Mandatory Sentencing- a mandatory sentence is a court decision where legal discretion is limited by law. Most frequently, people convicted of certain crimes such as armed robbery or murder must be punished with at least a minimum number of years set in prison. 2.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the most recent couple of years the verbal confrontation about whether obligatory sentencing ought to be nullified, and judges utilizing their own carefulness ought to happen has turned into a well known dialog in the United States. I see upsides and downsides for both sides. Mandatory least have filled the correctional facilites and penitentiaries with an excess of peaceful, first time guilty parties which brings about prison/jail packing and more obligation. President Obama expressed in a discourse "We have to lower long obligatory least sentences or dispose of them totally. " Opponents of compulsory least sentences contend that: Minority litigants are excessively detained contrasted with Caucasian respondents under the compulsory least…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this report for a non-governmental organization, Mclemore uses personal stories and examples from the USA to portray mandatory minimum sentencing as a lousy policy that should not be enacted in Canada. Mclemore highlights the negative aspects of such a policy that would take Canada in the wrong direction with its policy on crime. Her examples of these ‘tough on crime’ policies failing in the USA are especially convincing as it sheds light on the practice contributing negatively in past experiences. Mclemore is a senior researcher in the Health and Human rights division of the Human rights Watch. The Human Rights Watch is an enormous international non-governmental organization with an expenditure of almost 70 million in 2014.…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mandatory Minimums

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence “at the most intense levels of drug use, drugs and crime are directly and highly correlated and serious drug use can amplify and perpetuate preexisting criminal activity”. Taking this into consideration, it is not hard to understand why so many people are in support of more severe sentences in response to drug related crimes. While the effectiveness of the use of mandatory minimums to reduce drug related crimes is questionable, supporters of mandatory minimums make some compelling arguments that apply to all mandatory minimums not just those set on drug…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Studies of the mandatory minimum sentencing laws across the states suggest increasing sentences by 10% cuts crime by 1% so crime rate decreasing and the incarceration rate increase does not correlate. The sentencing system has not been working and crime will not increase, this has been proven by numerous states who have enacted sentencing reform and alternatives to incarceration and now are reaping the benefits. New York rolled back on their harsh mandatory sentencing laws and began sending drug offenders to drug courts and since then they’ve closed multiple prisons, have low recidivism rates, saved the state and taxpayers millions, and now New York has the lowest crime and incarceration rate out of any large state in the nation. Texas stopped building more prisons and began to strengthen alternative sanctions and their incarceration rate had dropped more than 9 percent and crime by a whopping 12 percent. Banning the box and getting rid of public housing discrimination laws will deter criminals from committing more crime, punishing convicts when they get out is a surefire way to ensure to go right back, but helping them renter society will make them want to…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Sentencing Project, which is a non-profit organization that promotes reduced reliance on incarceration and increased use of more effective alternatives to deal with crime, states that the United States correctional system of the past thirty years has been characterized by a population increasing the exponentially in response to changes in policy towards mandatory minimum and determinate sentencing (Sentencing). In other words, individuals convicted of a crime today are more likely to be sentenced to incarceration and spend longer terms in prison, than their counterparts in previous decades (Sentencing). In 2002, state and federal prison and local jail populations exceeded 2 million, a trend that has contributed to prison overcrowding and has overwhelmed state governments with the burden of funding this rapidly expanding penal system (Sentencing). These changes in policy have resulted in the reality that prisons today are filled with large numbers of non-violent and drug…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The research attempts to ascertain the impact that mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines have had on the criminal justice system as a whole in the United States. With its advent, mandatory minimum sentences have arguably had an economic impact on the justice system, particularly in corrections systems. Due to the fact that there are now more people being incarcerated for longer periods because of these sentencing guidelines, prisons are bearing an increasing cost for housing these inmates. Another factor that the research looks into is the inequities that are inherent when sentencing a non-violent offender with a sentence that is as stringent if not more so than those who have committed violent felonies. The repercussions these guidelines…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the United States, the use of mandatory minimums became commonplace with support from both sides of the political spectrum. With public support for tough laws, these sentencing minimums were enacted across the country due to increasing crime rates. However, in certain states, lawmakers and taxpayers are beginning to see that these laws cost more than they help. In Tallahassee, Florida, a twenty-five-year drug sentence for selling thirty-five pills for $300 will cost taxpayers an average of $18,064 per year, or $451,600 by the time the offender is released (Klas, 2017). Others will argue that mandatory minimums increase sentencing disparity because these do not follow federal sentencing guidelines.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It sets a precedent for new offenders and may offer a deterrent to those that consider their actions before commiting a crime. A minimum sentence guideline allows for a judge to not have to rely on gut instinct, personal consensus, but rather be confined to set procedures and guidelines set forth in local, state, and federal statutes. According to an article in the American Criminal Law Review the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 was intended to eliminate unwarranted sentencing disparity by establishing a "comprehensive and consistent statement of the Federal law of sentencing, setting forth the purposes to be served"(Hofer and Allenbaugh 39). The journal goes on to explain that with the new law came a new ideology for imposing criminal sentences intended to create a consistent environment among courts. With this new consistency everyone is being treated in the same way when it comes to punishment.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mass incarceration is ideally a part of American history. The increasing number of the prison population is alarming contrasting to the decrease of crime in the United States. The Caging of America depicts the relationship between mass incarceration and racism and mass incarceration and the crime rate. Gopnik shows that during the period of which incarceration rates were going up in the entire country, the crime rate was dropping, particularly in New York, therefore showing the cause of the crime fall had no linkage with prison over population. Gopnik sheds light to high rates of incarceration and the fact that incarceration should not be a method of crime control.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Why Prisons Don’t Work,” Wilbert Rideau claims state prisons will never improve the lives of criminals and lower crime rates in other states. There are four reasons to consider for dramatic shift to make prisons legitimately functional: 1) Resulting with a “silver bullet” instead of turning a criminal’s life around, 2) Keeping a prisoner long enough can make a man embrace inmate life, 3) Not focusing on the main threat of the young potential criminals, 4) Not giving enough opportunity of giving a convict a second chance at rehabilitation. People who come into a prison may never come out of the rest of his unchanged life. Putting a “silver bullet” through criminals does not keep society safe.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Causes Of Prison Overcrowding

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    The judicial system was buckling down on different drug offenses such as crack-cocaine, marijuana and opium. In 1985 marijuana was marked as the nation’s “number one problem” when it came to drug abuse. More people started using excessive amounts of marijuana since there was a decriminalization law. Eventually, it reached a high of sixty-four percent; programs and treatments were brought upon such as D.A.R.E (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) and G.R.E.A.T (Gang Resistance Education and Training). These programs were not just for adults, these were mainly targeted towards the youth so they will be pushed in the right direction.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last 40 years, incarceration in the United States has reached epidemic proportions. We have the highest incarceration rate in the world; we hold 5% of the world’s population, but house 25% of the world’s prisoners (Kelly 2015). The use of incarceration has gradually become a more acceptable and more used form of punishment. As a result, our prison population is overflowing with offenders ranging from petty theft criminals to violent offenders. As cited in the textbook, purposes of our justice system should be retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation, (Clear, Reisig, & Cole 2016, p.72-73) but we focus far too much on punishment first and rehabilitation second, if ever.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays