Man Vs. Self In Edgar Allen Poe's The Cast Of Amontillado

Good Essays
A person life’s growing up can have a major influence in their future, especially in someone’s writing. Edgar Allen Poe lost his wife and mother to a deadly disease, he had many enemies and always saw himself as a victim. In “The Cast of Amontillado” Edgar Allen Poe created a man who wanted revenge against his best friend Fortunato. Montresor took Fortunato to the family vault, by telling him he wanting his thought on the Amontillado wine. During the process of inclosing him, Fortunato began to beg to be let out. Montresor thought for a moment if he should or should not kill him. The conflict man vs. self, the character trait Montresor showed and a central idea of people needing to talk about things that they have obsessed over in “The Cast …show more content…
self. Montresor in the beginning of the story addressed “You, who so well knows my nature of my soul,” Montresor needed to tell someone and get out of his chest the revenge he had taken against Fortunato (Poe 1108). He wanted to let the person know he was confessing to that his actions he took in murdering his friends was not how everyone knew him. He was seen to any man in his community as kind and no one would have thought he would be able to murdering his own friend without a reason. “His death-bed confessor – for if Montresor has murdered Fortunato,” the revenge against his friend Fortunato had a major affect with himself and needed to confess the awful murder he committed (Thompson). Edgar Allen Poe creating Montresor confessing his murder he committed showed he wanted to do something good and change to be a better person even if it was his last day on earth. “His conduct showed the earnestness of his determination to reform his life,” Edgar Allen Poe showed he wanted to change his life after many years, his life influenced the conflict in the character he created in “The Cast of Amontillado” (Various 22). Shortly after trying to change his life and become friendly with others Edgar Allen Poe …show more content…
“[Edgar Allen Poe] often worked out his revenge on those he detested in his writing” (mystery). He created a cold-hearted man in his short story who is willing to kill his friend without a reason. In this short story, he had a major influence by his life and how he wanted to take revenge against someone but knew was impossible to do in real life. “When he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge,” Montresor has planned to kill Fortunato who have been friends for a while (Poe 1108). Montresor killing his friend with no reason was how Edgar Allen Poe took his revenge out on those who victimized him through his writing. Also during the story Montresor was caring, “for a brief moment I hesitated – I trembled,” he was thinking twice if he should kill his friend (Poe 1112). Montresor had some remorse in him since they were friends but that didn’t take away the thought that he needed to get revenge against Fortunato. Edgar Allen Poe being remorseful showed how he was caring and wanted the readers to know that Montresor was caring in being that Fortunato was one of his friends. The traits he created for Montresor were portraying the traits of his own

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Revenge Theme In Hamlet

    • 1119 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He introduces the story of how Claudius had murdered Old Hamlet and that had commenced Hamlet’s desire for revenge. The ghost speaks of how he lives terribly because of how he had died and that he needs to be avenged in order to live a better afterlife. Therefore, because Old Hamlet cannot physically get revenge on Claudius, he sends out Hamlet to become sort of the middleman and get revenge both for himself and for his father because he is unable to do it by himself. The ghost also uses guilt in his speech in order to successfully get Hamlet to get revenge for him. He states that “If thou didst ever thy dear father love...Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder.”(I.v.23-25).…

    • 1119 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Once Laertes found out his father was dead he wanted to kill his father 's murder. Laertes even said himself in Act 4 Scene 5, “Let come what comes, only I’ll be revenged most thoroughly for my father.” (page 215). His loyalty and madness only makes his revenge more certain and he utilizes them as a stimulation to actually carry out revenge. Additionally, once he sees that Ophelia turned mad and eventually drowns herself because her father was killed by Hamlet and Hamlet has left her, Laertes is motivated to avenge Hamlet. In the complex story of Hamlet, Claudius also seeks revenge.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While Hamlet is her suitor. That is where the similarities end. When comparing Hamlet’s revenge scheme to Laertes it 's clear that there are big differences between the two. Throughout the play Hamlet seemed to always procrastinate killing Claudius and resorted to using tricks, such as the made up play, to prove if Claudius is really guilty. While Laertes immediately found out who killed his father, he made a plan to have them killed.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Other players, like Hamlet and Claudius, are considered ambiguous as well, but they’re abiguity contributes to the moral theme in a different way. Laertes showed the audience that, having good intentions can be corrupted by the actions taken for pride and honor. For example, he forgives Hamlet for killing his father, but continues to fight him for his family’s honor. As he was about to kill Hamlet, he felt a drop of remorse, and proceeded to kill him saying . .…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Macbeth As A Tragic Play

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Macbeth encountered a numerous amount of tragedies throughout his life, committing murder and having a dismal life that transferrred into his family life. It is left to our interperetation to decide whether Macbeth is the antagonist or protagonist. While he did make some morally questionable decisions throughout his life, Macbeth did it because in his mind it was what needed to be done. His wife unequivocally was the beginning of the end. Lady Macbeth used her husband to achieve her level of greed but realized on the rise that she couldn’t handle the heat.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tybalt came back again totry and kill Romeo for no real reason except that he was a Capulet. Butthis time, Romeo was lucky because he was acting purely on the fact that his best friend had died and he was fighting Tybalt to uphold the law.The law states that if someone is killed than the killer's life shall be taken. The following quote shows again how he let his temper flare and caused him again to act out towards the Montague family. Thou, wretched boy, that didst consort him here, shalt with him hence. (Page 654, Act 3, Scene 1, and Lines 129 – 130) Because of his harsh words, Romeo lost control and killed Tybalt not because of the rivalry but for the life of his now dead friend.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He has a reason to seek vengeance on those who were involved with the murder. Friedrich Nietzsche said “It is impossible to suffer without making someone pay for it, every complaint already contains revenge.” “If you ever loved your father, I call upon you now to take revenge.” (Pg.23).After Hamlet found out his father was murdered, he was unable to contain himself. His father left him with the task of avenging his foul murder. (He wanted to avenge his father, that he killed someone else who he thought was his father.)??? “Hamlet looked at her stupidly.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The former King is filling him with thoughts of betrayal by his own family. When he reveals the truth behind his death, he plants in Hamlet’s head the idea of betrayal which is the beginning of Hamlet’s madness. Although a father should guide his son in a positive direction, Old King Hamlet actually does the opposite. He explains to Hamlet that his own brother was the sole killer by poisoning him. He asks Hamlet to “revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” (Act.1 Scene.5 Line.31).…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to the United States homicide law premeditation, deliberation and the will to kill are vital factors in differentiating between first and second-degree murder. Hamlets intention to kill was seen in how fast he moved to kill the individual behind the curtain without confirming if he was the right victim (Act3.4.22). His last act after seeing it was Polonius adds to his guilt, as usually, a person would ask for forgiveness but Hamlet abused Polonius for being at the wrong time and place adding more to his guilt (Act…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lennie would have experience way more pain if Curley captures him. “I’m gonna shoot the guts outta that big bastard myself, even if I only got one hand” (Steinbeck, 98). When Curley realizes that Lennie was the one who killed his wife, he was super furious, not just because his wife is dead but also of what Lennie have done to his hand. He will not waste his chance of getting revenge, Curley wants Lennie to suffer, to die slowly and painfully by shooting him in the guts. Yet George does not want his best friend to suffer, he was willing to help his friend died in a less painful way.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays