Steven Avery Case Analysis

Improved Essays
Making a murderer is a popular new Netflix series that widely criticizes the criminal justice system in a small rural community of Manitowoc County Wisconsin. Steven Avery, the main character in the series, is convicted of the rape of Penny Beernsten but is later exonerated. Then just two years after his release, he is convicted for the killing of Teresa Halbach. All of the initial evidence that is recovered makes a good case proving that Avery in fact was liable for the crime but after time the some evidence begins to unveil that he may have been framed by the Manitowoc Sheriff’s Department. This drama filled documentary of Steven Avery’s first conviction and release, his second conviction and trial, and the trial and conviction of Brendan …show more content…
When Teresa was reported missing the county set out many search parties for her and one mother and her teenage daughter decided to check the Avery salvage yard for a key piece of evidence like her car or maybe even herself. They found Teresa 's vehicle covered with debris deep in the salvage yard and that is what led to the arrest of Steven Avery. Later there was blood found in the car that was tested and matched to Avery and the key to the car was found in Avery 's home. All of this evidence makes you think this is a clear cut case that will put Steven Avery for good right? Not quite. Since Steven was indicted for murder his 36 million that he originally wanted was cut to 400,000, just enough to hire the best defense team money could buy. That defense team was made up of the two finest lawyers in Wisconsin Jerome Buting and Dean Strange. To begin with, the Manitowoc county sheriff 's department was not allowed to help search the Avery property or help in any way but somehow two officers were searching Stevens trailer when a key to a Toyota car was found. That key was found on the eighth day of the search after the trailer was scanned many times before. The key was found only when the Manitowoc county officers entered. Next was the blood found in the car. It was only a tiny spec found near the ignition. The blood was tested and Steven Avery was found accountable for it. But after further digging …show more content…
Brendan of course didn 't have the money to pay good lawyers so he was appointed two. This is where the criminal justice system may be questioned the most. The two lawyers were working with the prosecutors. Brendan 's defense team manipulated him into confessing to the murder and testifying against his uncle. After evidence was brought out that Brendan had corrupt lawyers there was a mistrial and new lawyers were brought upon to no avail. After everything that his previous defense team had forced him to say on tape that was enough for the jury to indite him on all three charges and send him away for 30

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Steven Vail Case

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dassey eventually recanted his confession, but it was too late and his trial went forward. This was enough to propel the Avery case forward. Despite finding no trace of Halbach’s blood on the Avery property or in any of the places Dassey once claimed to be the murder site, Steven Avery was found guilty of the murder of Teresa…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nathson Fields Case Study

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He was handed one of the largest rewards in a wrongful conviction case in Chicago history. $30,000 from O’Callaghan and $10,000 from Murphy. It found that O’Callaghan and Murphy violated Fields due to process rights, and that the violation was a result of a Chicago policy practice. They violated Fields rights by withholding evidence from defense attorneys that could have pointed him away from being the killer. Also, it made an intentional infliction of emotional distress finding against…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the death of Sandy Seale due to a stabbing, Donald Marshall was accused of the murder of his companion. After the police investigated the situation, Marshall was tried in court and found guilty of the murder charges. However, during the initial investigation, trial and re-investigation, many errors did occur which eventually led to the wrongful conviction of an innocent man. A key witness in the prosecutor's case testified to have seen Donald Marshall in the park with Sandy Seale and claims to have witnessed Marshall stabbing Seale.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the Verdict correct? Although the trial ends with a verdict of not guilty, it is not made clear whether or not Steve was completely innocent. I believe, that Steve didn’t take part in the murder or the crime based off of evidence in the story. First of all, Steve Harman is scared to death of jail.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Billy Joe Brown was giving false evidence, and told the court that Dustin Turner baited Jennifer Evans to the car where Billy Joe Brown killed her. However the way Billy Joe Brown was telling his story was literally impossible to happen. Billy Joe Brown told the court that they had Jennifer Evans arms under the back of the seats and her legs by the clutch. When they brought this evidence to the court, they never brought the car in, they only brought in the car seats. This made it false evidence, because if they use the same car, they would have realized how ridiculous his story…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The prosecutor in the retrials was…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oj Simpson Fast Facts

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Following less than five hours of discussion on October 2, 1995, the jury returned to the courtroom the next morning to announce that they found the defendant not guilty of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Members of the jury felt that because the gloves did not fit on the Juice’s hands, he could not have been guilty of killing Nicole and Ron (“O.J. Simpson Fast Facts”). The prosecution felt defeated, while the defense rejoiced. The Brown and Goldman families were outraged, the Simpson family felt relief. The trial was over, but the fight would never end.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful Conviction On the morning of August 10, 1984, Deborah Sykes was brutally stabbed, sexually assaulted, and eventually killed in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. The man convicted for her murder was Darryl Hunt, a 19 year old boy that would go on to spend 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. Hunt was convicted based on eye-witness testimony and informants, but was later exonerated based on DNA evidence that matched a man that was caught just a few months after the murder took place. This case is an exemplar of the strength of DNA evidence and the fragility of eyewitness testimony.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Courtroom 302 provides the reader with a real time view of criminal processing. Steve Bogira begins this work from the earliest moment that a person is entered into the criminal justice system, the arrest. Bogira then takes the reader on a step by step reading tour of criminal processing, following alleged offenders as they progress through the system. Bogira introduces the reader to every character that he follows, sharing with them a background of the character, perhaps in an attempt to garner understanding of the character to the offender.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He never got to make a verdict; he was fired a week later from his manger position in Hawley. His owner there learned about his job decision. This left him with one choice, he was now the owner of Park Rapids…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    he was trying to find out who killed him also. My judgement on the judge judgement on chapter 28. The judge i feel like is open minded to what everyone got to say. He wants nothing but the truth.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This also created bias judgement from the judge, David Burnett, who continuously denied innocence of suspects, although strong supporting evidence was present. One of the evidence found was a piece of hair on one of the boy’s shoe lances. With use of advanced DNA technology, the hair was tested and a connection was made with one of the stepfathers, Terry Hobbs. Hobbs told the cops that he had not seen any of the boys that day, but a witness from his neighbourhood contradicted his statement. Due to the bias judgement of the police officers during the investigation, no one took time to question Hobbs’ neighbours to support his statement, but inevitably took his word for it.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “It took them only a short time to reach their verdict. “Guilty of murder in the first degree,” said the foreman of the jury” (David 15). The jury disregarded all of the reasonable doubt shown, and declared them guilty without even much deliberation. Despite this verdict, the defense had expected this and were ready to appeal the verdict. New evidence arose after the trial, and this evidence should have cleared the two of all guilt.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Raph Armstrong Case Study

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    THE CASE AGAINST RALPH ARMSTRONG In late 2015, Wisconsin’s criminal justice came to the fore of the nation’s public consciousness with the Making a Murderer documentary series. The series detailed the handling of Steven Avery’s murder case in 2007 and how it related to his exoneration in an earlier wrongly convicted rape case in 1985. Both of his cases fell under a heavy cloud of doubt in the veracity of the investigation, the validity of the charges against him and the trial that imprisoned him.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Thesis

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As humans we tend to point fingers very quickly. This young boy was given a fair trial but to what extent? The witnesses were not very reliable but the jury tried to pin any evidence they could on the boy to make sure he was guilty. They were quick to accuse the kid of murdering his father because of how the boy lived. The jurors had nowhere else to put the blame on so they assumed it must be placed on the boy.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays