The steadfast Conservative is only made up of about 12% of the public. I couldn’t agree more, a lot of my ideas and views are opposite of my peers. This group of people are overwhelmingly Republican and holds a very conservative attitude across most issues. This would make since that I would fall under that political party. I am huge supporter of the Republicans’ current nominee and agree with his slogan “Make America Great Again”.
One of the question that I found interesting is "Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost”. Only a 11% of the general public agreed with me. I feel like a lot of people are not understanding the question, therefore those people do not know how to combat the current problem. If we did have stricter environmental laws we would not have all the problems we have now. An example would be the pipe line that broke in the southern United States. If we had laws in place I would only allow high quality materials to be used and mandatory maintenance, that problem could had been avoided.
The other question that stood out to me was "Government aid to the poor does more harm than good, by making people too dependent on government assistance." A surprising 86% of the general public agreed with me on that issue. It is a current epidemic in the United States and is bleeding our system dry. I have seen from personal …show more content…
Starting off with security and what it means to you as a citizen of the United States. Security you would think that will be put in place to protect you? We have to understand that the term security is a slippery slope and rights can be taken away in the name of security. Liberty is the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s behavior or political views. Liberty has led to many things in the United States like, laying the ground work for legal rights of
One of the question that I found interesting is "Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost”. Only a 11% of the general public agreed with me. I feel like a lot of people are not understanding the question, therefore those people do not know how to combat the current problem. If we did have stricter environmental laws we would not have all the problems we have now. An example would be the pipe line that broke in the southern United States. If we had laws in place I would only allow high quality materials to be used and mandatory maintenance, that problem could had been avoided.
The other question that stood out to me was "Government aid to the poor does more harm than good, by making people too dependent on government assistance." A surprising 86% of the general public agreed with me on that issue. It is a current epidemic in the United States and is bleeding our system dry. I have seen from personal …show more content…
Starting off with security and what it means to you as a citizen of the United States. Security you would think that will be put in place to protect you? We have to understand that the term security is a slippery slope and rights can be taken away in the name of security. Liberty is the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s behavior or political views. Liberty has led to many things in the United States like, laying the ground work for legal rights of