Democracy Is Pluralistic In Nature

Good Essays
Every nation and country has a way of running itself; a way to govern what is considered lawful and unlawful. In the United States of American, there is a massive controversial debate about whether our democracy is majoritarian or if it is more pluralistic in nature. Some may argue that the mass public, or every citizen in the country, is able to control the government’s actions. Others will state that many groups are able to work together amongst themselves to be able to allow more involvement of the citizens in a majority of the nation’s decisions. Both of these ideas of how our government works are similar in ways as well as different in many other ways. Knowledge of the citizen, interest groups, government structure is a few differences …show more content…
Seeing everything from their own perspective, causes very different opinions on the same matter or ideas. When people have those different points of view and opinions and they try to share those opinions with others, Controversy often occurs between the two groups of people. These controversy sometimes can be solved through working together to make a reasonable conclusion, while more often than not those ideas may never come to rest. That is because of the fact that nobody would be able to see it through each other’s eyes; there would always be someone else out that that did not see the same way as everyone else. When you bring ideas about democracy, like majoritarian versus pluralistic, those opinions will never be the same no matter where you go in the nation or even …show more content…
Two people arguing about which one is superior. Usually you only hear about their differences but very few about their similarities. Due to the fact that majoritarian democracy is ruled by the major section of the public, the public must be more aware of the happens of the government. They must know how the decisions are made and what goes on behind the scenes more than anything else. Decisions making needs to be understood because of the fact that bad decisions can be made if the people do not have the right knowledge. The people also need to be willing to participate during the election times. Majoritarian democracy is more centralized, meaning that a small group is able to help aid in the mechanisms of majority rule. Pluralistic is in the far spectrum; completely opposite of majoritarian. It does not require that every citizen knows the ways of the democracy, that it is it relies heavily on the interests’ groups, mainly that groups leader. Also, it is a decentralized structure of government, meaning that many hands or groups of hands have a grasp at the power around them. When it comes to decision making, majoritarian allows all of its people to help in the decision making where as in pluralistic citizens can go up in front of certain leaders of the groups and be heard by them where the leaders would consider or not consider the citizen’s arguments. One of the few similarities that these two democracy have is

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    When it comes down to it direct and representative have more differences than similarities. Some of the few things that they have in common is voting, which plays a large part when it comes to letting citizens have a say in their government. One of the biggest consequence, both governments suffers is risk of corruption. In a direct democracy, citizens do not have much of a say. Not only that, but those elected do not have to fulfill any promises made before being elected.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Even though time separated Herman and Chomsky and Plato, they all noticed how the information systems present in their society are used to shape and mold the public consciousness. They both identify specific roles in the society that are a part of this: the masses/public, the shadow-makers/media, the rulers/powerful societal interests, and the philosophers/critics. While both philosophers see the public being manipulated, they disagree on how to fix this problem and who should be in control of the government. Herman and Chomsky suggest that democracy is the best way to rule for a government. On the contrary, Plato believes that the public is the problem and that democracy should be avoided as a way to rule a government and that a small group…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Government was created because men; whether they be rich or poor, cannot govern themselves. As James Madison said, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.1 However, the government is designed to rule in favor of the people. If enough people want something to be changed, they will fight for it; and with persistence, they can achieve their goal. In the Federalist Paper #10, Madison states that factions can cause problems because they can promote violence and there is political instability associated with factions.3 However, people do not have the same opinions. Factions are going to happen and although there can be negative associations with factions; there are positive effects as well.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Is Autocratic Power

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These are just a few of the actions the government does that get people upset, and they should be upset that the government does not have their best interest at heart. The best way to strengthen American democracy is to have a strong America. If the lower and middle class just comes together and realize that there is far more of us than it is of the one percent we could have real political change. So we have to have to vote, campaign, and rally seriously for what we want they have to give it to us. Though it is popular opinion that the U.S. government can do whatever they want they can not because of the people.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    J.S. Mill like other political thinkers before him had various issues with government that was ran through a democracy. Overall, I would not say that J.S. Mill is not undemocratic, he instead just fears what majorities would do if they had access to that much power because much of what Mill believes is centered on the personal development of the individual. One of other main concerns with democracy is that with rule by a majority you will in turn sometimes suppress a minority.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Because citizens elect the officials, it is a democracy. A representative democracy is also a democracy because it limits the powers of the representatives. The representatives do not have absolute rule which prevents the democracy from becoming a totalitarian government. Representative democracies are important to keeping a largely populated country functional. Each citizen still has his or her voice heard from voting.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Forcing a unitary government onto this country would be moving backwards in my opinion, because the decisions are made higher in the ranks and the orders are given to those in lower ranks to follow. According to Skyline College, the power isn’t shared amongst the “weaker” states. (Skylineguides) Which could easily turn into one ethnicity running the country instead of considering the wants and needs of everyone who inhabits the land. In a way, unitary government reminds me of a communist state, because there is one group of people who decide what will be the norm and everyone else must follow it. While with federal government, individuals may find it easier to voice their opinion over the way the country is ran as well as seeing more representation in the higher offices of authority.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Conception Of Democracy

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    We are not 100% democratic, but that’s okay. The citizens need to have checks and balances just like our branches of government. The type of governing we have in America works best when one group doesn’t have too much power. Sometimes it’s best to let the government take control of things because the people aren’t always as qualified to handle the issues at hand. It all has to do with moderation.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Instead of voting on elected officials, citizens vote on the direct issues without putting trust into strangers in the social institutions. Participatory democracy requires much more involvement than representative democracy (Participatory Democracy). Regarding the social institutions of America, many current representatives would no longer be necessary. Some higher heads of democracy would still be needed for certain decisions, of course. Reducing not only the amount of representatives in social institutions, but also reducing the importance of representatives also affects…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    By making it possible to keep the two branches of government from being the same party, the views of both parties can be shown and system of balance can be created between the two groups. Having these groups separate allows legislation to be agreed on by all types of people instead of those of a singular thought set or party. This system allows only the important and well agreed on legislation to pass but it can also lead to gridlock and infighting between the groups as they each wish to bring their own objectives into politics. Another reason why the Presidential system is stable is that there are multiple layers of checks and balances used in order to keep the government fair. By having the distinct separation of executive and legislative it allows legislation to be thoroughly checked and understood before…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays