Democracy Is Pluralistic In Nature

Every nation and country has a way of running itself; a way to govern what is considered lawful and unlawful. In the United States of American, there is a massive controversial debate about whether our democracy is majoritarian or if it is more pluralistic in nature. Some may argue that the mass public, or every citizen in the country, is able to control the government’s actions. Others will state that many groups are able to work together amongst themselves to be able to allow more involvement of the citizens in a majority of the nation’s decisions. Both of these ideas of how our government works are similar in ways as well as different in many other ways. Knowledge of the citizen, interest groups, government structure is a few differences …show more content…
Seeing everything from their own perspective, causes very different opinions on the same matter or ideas. When people have those different points of view and opinions and they try to share those opinions with others, Controversy often occurs between the two groups of people. These controversy sometimes can be solved through working together to make a reasonable conclusion, while more often than not those ideas may never come to rest. That is because of the fact that nobody would be able to see it through each other’s eyes; there would always be someone else out that that did not see the same way as everyone else. When you bring ideas about democracy, like majoritarian versus pluralistic, those opinions will never be the same no matter where you go in the nation or even …show more content…
Two people arguing about which one is superior. Usually you only hear about their differences but very few about their similarities. Due to the fact that majoritarian democracy is ruled by the major section of the public, the public must be more aware of the happens of the government. They must know how the decisions are made and what goes on behind the scenes more than anything else. Decisions making needs to be understood because of the fact that bad decisions can be made if the people do not have the right knowledge. The people also need to be willing to participate during the election times. Majoritarian democracy is more centralized, meaning that a small group is able to help aid in the mechanisms of majority rule. Pluralistic is in the far spectrum; completely opposite of majoritarian. It does not require that every citizen knows the ways of the democracy, that it is it relies heavily on the interests’ groups, mainly that groups leader. Also, it is a decentralized structure of government, meaning that many hands or groups of hands have a grasp at the power around them. When it comes to decision making, majoritarian allows all of its people to help in the decision making where as in pluralistic citizens can go up in front of certain leaders of the groups and be heard by them where the leaders would consider or not consider the citizen’s arguments. One of the few similarities that these two democracy have is