The Role Of Conformism In Civil Disobedience, By Henry David Thoreau

Improved Essays
Maintaining individuality in a society that practices conformism can be a difficult task. Nonetheless, this task is vital to the identity of an individual. It is also vital to the progress of society since without individuality the world would be led by followers rather than leaders that can discern from right and wrong. It is through autonomy and self-exploration that people can strive for change within themselves and our nation. Henry David Thoreau’s Walden and “Civil Disobedience” both discuss the idea of obtaining independence from our established institution trough the exploration of the self and by being self-reliant. He also emphasizes that in order to achieve these two, people need to live a life of simplicity.
Thoreau challenges our
…show more content…
Moreover, being different is seen as something abnormal, which usually isolates the individual forcing the person to comply to public’s opinion. Thoreau criticizes society because as a whole, it robs people of their consciousness and how they wish to be view. He states, “a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice,” this means that what the majority thinks is usually not right because it is true but because as the majority in society they hold higher power, therefore, their words are consider as fact. Hence, when a person blindly follows what it is said, without questioning, he becomes a slave of the nation. Thoreau complains about people’s blind faith in their government and tries to tell them that being individualistic is alright and it’s something we should strive to achieve. He states, “The mass of men serves the state thus, not as men mainly, but as machines, with their bodies” by stating that men are not better than machines, he points out the problem of men losing their humanity. It also conveys his concern regarding the mediocrity of life due to the absence of autonomy. After all, autonomy begets productivity since the refusal to conform to the prevailing rules creates change and foments …show more content…
We need to make the world fit around us rather than try to fit into the world. Thoreau gives the tools in which we can achieve this; autonomy and by exploring our minds. Thought I concede that being independent from society’s views and rules is important and necessary, I think that is impossible or very difficult to acquire or assert real individuality in today’s society. Currently, being unique and individualistic is the trend which poses the question, is it trying to be individualistic really being nonconformist in today’s society? However, whether this is able or not is not as important as to attempt to achieve that state of mind. One controversial issue that arose in Thoreau’s writing that I agree with is that people should have a questing attitude of mind. We should always seek knowledge about the world and ourselves in order to not be in disadvantage and help shape and change the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    People of a society should not blindly follow authority figures. Questioning authority is a crucial way to improve society and bring people together. There needs to be a form of strong reasoning for following what the authority figures have said. If there isn’t any, the authority figures should be questioned on why they are ordering people to follow their…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is not enough to simply walk around and only have concern for how our personal actions will affect our personal lives. This transitive concern for our affect on the world enforces a cycle of action and of observation in tandem with one another. Heschel stresses that freedom is not the freedom to act frivolously without regard for others; freedom is not to act as one desires. Freedom is a challenge against impulse. Impulse guides people to act with a dangerous amount of freedom when not they are not aware of the effect that freedom can have.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thus, the ideal character 1 J. S. Mill, On Liberty 4 for Mill is the one who is able to establish a balance between the general ability to obey the social rules and the capability of thinking for oneself.2 It is now clear that, in Mill’s understanding, society is in the helpful position to improve individuals faculty. However, considering practical life, it is very controversial whether Mill’s theory is applicable. Many scholors seems to be considered Mill’s theory as an inconsistent in itself. The most obvious reason for this is that regarding Mill as a utilitarian, the happiness of the majority should be considered first, but the criteria which is given by Mill seems to be contradicted majoritiy’s priority. Mill also emphasize the importance of society in many place of his writing, but whether we should give priority to individual or society is not clear.…

    • 2009 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Emancipation is seen as the process that sets free the individual from legal, social or political manipulation. In order to reach emancipation, the facts that are presented by the critical theory have to be understood, by the use of each individual’s beliefs and epistemic principles, in the terms of the circumstances that gave them birth; this concepts should not be taken as given, because otherwise it leads again to false…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Disobedience In Society

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Society are formed for the “mutual preservation of [citizen’s] lives, liberties and estate.”. To act against a law, a person must value their moral integrity as more valuable than the preservation of their property. The societal laws should not be based solely on majority values, instead those values which everyone may compromise to and not be restricted or have their consciences in contention should be upheld. Once an individual has determined that they cannot adapt their view for the protection society provides their property, then that individual has a duty to act on their morals or to leave that…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Right at that moment is when he started thing for him self more . He thinks for himself though because he's different from everyone else like he doesn't want to do the same thing every day, being miserable in that failed corrupt infrastructure called a society. When he starts falling in love with liberty, thats not allowed . Everyone is suppose to be liked and treat the same. Equality even gave he a nickname called the “Golden One”.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However I can see why he came up with the ideas that he did. He lived underneath an absolute Monarch so I can see why he wouldn’t exactly be on the same page with Hobbes in terms of iron fisted rulers presiding over the country 's affairs. Now Montesquieu’s take on people is a little different from Locke’s and I believe given how Hobbes describes the world it makes a little sense. Hobbes says that people are inherently bad evil and willing to do whatever to benefit themselves. Montesquieu 's take is that people themselves actually live in such fear and are intimidated by the thought of falling into a state of war that they would have to work with people just to make certain that this didn 't happen.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Becoming A Leader Essay

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    You cannot have leadership by simply relying on just a few principles. Leadership itself is complex, that you need to make a tough decision without depending on the famous steps but by pursuing the shared purpose of achieving a positive yet empowering notion on lasting an effective and influencing policy. In the case of leadership philosophy, mine comes from different aspects, and one of those is having self-awareness. It is relatively important to have…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meaning that the story is about him or the effect he has and because he is opposing the government which is wrong he is the hero. Hero’s are put in stories to put an end to the evil or negative forces in the story. They are the person people are rooting for to win when the good vs. evil fight happens. In the story you want to root for im because of his flashy and blatant opposition of his inequitable government.Vonnegut uses this archetype because most heroes are very different from ourselves they are usually more powerful than most humans. This feature is necessary to prove that their form of “equality” is wrong.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is impossible for people to see the benefits if they do not know the basic precepts of the ideology. America has been molded to believe that socialism is about total control. In reality, it aims to help the working man. However, ideological hegemony is to blame for the war on socialism. Ideological hegemony is a dangerous process whereby the dominant ideology is ingrained in the public through the media, schools, churches, and other agents (Neumann 1).This leads to misinformed citizens.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays