Definition Of Propaganda By Mahatma Ghandi

Improved Essays
Mahatma Ghandi

It all started in the train station of Durban when I was in my way to defend a case in Pretoria, I set a foot inside first class cabinet and the guards were watching me like if I was some a Demon entering to the gates of heaven. So I went to my seat ,and I started to read some of my notes I was having a pleasant moment but then something I will never imaging could happen, happened to me. A guard came to me and put his hand on my shoulder, and he ask me what are you doing here ? I told him that I was a passenger ,but he did not listen. He grabbed me ,and he told me “no you are not” , he took me outside and he proceed to beat me ,all this trouble occured
…show more content…
Indians need someone that could be able to change their situation and make it better, I realize that could be me, so I took action immediately . The way I started my discrimination fight was by the creation of the Natal Indian Congress which to help organize the Indian community and unite it as one. When my activist movement started I opted for a passive form of protest which basically consisted of the use propaganda even the national Indian congress was propaganda to make the people of england know what was happening in Natal. With time I realized that my passive form of protest was useless so I decided to opt to a new form of protest called non-violence resistance which I called satarahaya. My political philosophy movement was characterized by the use of peaceful techniques like civil disobedience, non-cooperation, not paying fines, etc. The reason I decided to change form of protest I was using is because the British empire was watching passively what was happening in India with their arms crossed so a new method was needed to take this revolution forward. I lead a lot of important atarahaya movements in South Africa but I knew If I wanted to make a big impact I needed to go back to India. And that is what I did, In 1915 returned back to …show more content…
One of my main objective was indiscrimination,but it was not going to be possible to eradicate the one that exist toward indians if we do not eliminate the one that exist among our people. So I decide that a good way to start was to make people accept more the untouchables ,by allowing them join my cause and me also doing activities that only them were suppose to do, I was able to make Indian view them different in the good way and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. wanted to see a change made in not only their countries, but in the worlds they lived in. Both of them pushed for a nonviolent society in which their communities and families could live in. Despite what was going on around them, they always tried to take the route of less resistance, even if that meant being spit on, arrested and even thrown in jail. Mahatma Gandhi was a key ingredient to the growth of Indian Nationalism, while Martin Luther King, Jr. was a main reason the Civil Rights Movement became as big as it did with the help of some other notable men and women. Social change was inevitable for both of these men, but they both had to go through road blocks and naysayers to achieve that goal.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The British government was well aware of the caste system that Gandhi supported; so the British took governmental actions against this system to ensure that the Indians won’t have a respected organization and for Gandhi to change the local community. However the strength of Mahatma Gandhi and the protesters that were against the British, brought attention to the society of the British and its army. The British happened to be annoyed due to the protesters and the Gandhi revolution and they successfully stopped the British from forcing Indians to have no freedom for themselves. Gandhi was able to manage India to be free from the British government and the Indian society supported Gandhi…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He taught his Indians that they must to fight for them rights, but without violence. He advised that everyone need not keep to nonviolence, especially if it were used as a cover for cowardice, saying, "where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence." (Gandhi, Rajmohan (2006) pp. 2, 8, 269). The Indians do not have to obey British’s laws and to not respect them.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Neither of them succeeded in converting the other but they learned more about their different beliefs,”(154) showing how Mr. Brown and Akunna tried to mutually understand each other’s culture through these debates in order to minimize conflict and to do what is just and moral in a situation, without completely disregarding the other’s culture and thoughts. In our Utopia, we therefore tried to create a situation where there was a better possibility in everyone having…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From 1919 to 1922, British government applied some brutal laws for the people of British India like Rowlett act and incident of Jallianwala Bagh had leaved so many pains. Therefore these incidents lead to the protest of two separate issues and emerged them into a one platform. These two movements were Khilafat movement from Muslims and Non-Cooperative movement from Hindus. Although Khilafat movement is a sentimental issue towards the Muslims and Not connected directly to the politics of India but these two movements lead two the biggest protest In the history of British India and showed the Hindu Muslim Unity yet Again. CONGRESS ON KHILAFAT MOVEMENT AND NON-COOPEARTION MOVEMENT: Support of Congress was very important for the Khilafat movement.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King,Jr led several nonviolent protest movements “that historians credit” to the many laws passed to abolish segregation and establish equality between the races. Mohandas Gandhi also helped bring about change in his country-India- by leading nonviolent protest. Mohandas Gandhi is a famous nationalist leader of India who fought for independence from Great Britain using only nonviolent methods such as civil disobedience and boycotts. Gandhi called his philosophy of nonviolence,Satyagraha. Gandhi began his efforts in civil rights when he witnessed the oppression and denial of basic civil rights of the Indian people in Africa.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Gandhi states “ It is possible that those who are forced to observe peace under their pressure would fight after their withdrawal.” This is a blatant admittance that Gandhi did not believe it would be a positive thing for the British to just vacate India, as the extremist of the movement wanted, because of the violence it could cause. Though he does not want a third party, such as Britain, to step in and moderate the violence even though innocent people will be harmed. In his own words, Gandhi states, “Such protection can only make the weak weaker.” this shows that India at the time was not a strong nation at all and that Gandhi believed being coddled would only…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Dalit

    • 2243 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Mahatma Gandhi gave birth to the term ‘Harijans’ in the 1930s. The term ‘Harijan’ literally means God’s children. It was said that in order to unite the whole of India against the common oppressor, this move was adopted by Gandhi as a part of his political strategy. However, Ambedkar did not subscribe to the notion of the Hindu majority representing the common interests of both the Hindus and the Depressed Classes. His demand was respected by the British and the Communal Award was awarded to Indians in 1932.…

    • 2243 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The residence of the tribe either joined the ideas of the British or rebelled. Those who rebelled ultimately lost due to the advancements the British had over them. This type of invasion happened continuously throughout history. Including the genocide Europeans committed in America on the natives after leaving Europe. Condorcet believed things would change after the introduction of the Enlightenment era, but sadly he was wrong.…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Fanon takes on the idea of “a tooth for a tooth”, and claimed that since the colonizers establish their superiority through violence, we will regain our equality through the same mechanism. The two opposing ideas of Gandhi and Fanon are not reconcilable. Elements of violence are inevitable, especially for a modern state. However, governments should put into efforts into creating a defensive mechanism, which acts non-coercively to subside the violence. The state should not be playing the role of cooperating with the societal violence.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays