Magna Carta Today

Improved Essays
The Magna Carta is the most significant historical document in Commonwealth history that is still extremely relevant today in many aspects of Canadian everyday life in the 21st Century. The Magna Carta was the first document to challenge the authority of the monarchy and establish important democratic, human and civil rights and responsibilities (Howard, 1998). These rights and responsibilities that the Magna Carta introduced are still, to this date, entrenched in the Constitution of Canada and many other nations and have a profound effect on current day events. The Magna Carter is responsible for the creation of the rule of law, democratic right as well as essential human rights and freedoms that have had significant influence of Canada. …show more content…
The human rights and freedoms introduced in the Magna Carta have been the primary building block for every other human rights declaration and legislation in the world. The most well-known and authorities of these documents that was based of the Magna Carta is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations (Orend, 1971). The most important fundamental freedom and right that it created was the right against unlawful detainment and execution. The Magna Carta states “No free man shall be taken or imprisoned or dispossessed, or outlawed, or banished, or in any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him, nor send upon him, except by the legal judgement of his peers or by the law of the land.” This was revolutionary at the time where feudal leaders imprisoned and killed at their mere inclination and is today still a fundamental human right (Bloch, 1965). This is extremely significant in Canada as a legal right in Section 8 and 9 of the Charter. This right has had a huge effect on Police conduct by resulting in the creation of legal requirements and thresholds for search, seizure and arrest which have been reaffirmed in numerous landmark cases (Katz, 1980). Another important human right that originated in the Magna Carta was access to the judicial system, more specifically the introduction of habeas corpus. Habeas corpus is the right to be brought before the court in a reasonable time to determine whether your imprisonment is lawful. Habeas corpus is seen as the greatest safeguard to prevent the arbitrary detention of an individual (Wright, 1994). This right is an extremely important right that has been preserved and entrenched in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and is exercised on a regular basis in the Canadian legal system. One significant case in the Canadian legal system where this right was disregarded by the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Mavis Baker Case Summary

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The case that will be examined in this case analysis is Baker v. Canada. It is a case about a mother, Mavis Baker. Ms. Baker overstayed her visa in Canada. After supporting herself illegally for eleven years, she was ordered deported. She asked to be exempt from the law based upon other circumstances.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Canada was not all as you see it be now. Behind the freedom, there was a time Canada had to face and fight to become the nation it is today. A nation that was part of the British Empire, it was only expected of Canada to be involved with whatever Britain was involved in. It was only expected of Canada to have almost every treaty or agreement with another country, approved by a Britain official. It was only expected of Canada to follow the laws and conduct that Britain had laid out for them.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V. Tran, 2010 SCC 58

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court of Canada is the foundation of Canadian Law in our society. It keeps the criminals at bay, and the innocent free. In my opinion, the Supreme Court of Canada does it’s job in upholding a high standard of effectiveness and success. It effectively balances the rights of individuals against the needs of society The case R v. Tran, 2010 SCC 58, [2010] 3 S.CE. 350 clearly portrays the effectiveness of the Supreme Court of Canada.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mongolian Empire Dbq

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Magna Carta- (1215) a charter of liberties that King John of England had to sign; it made the king obey the same laws as the citizens of his kingdom also required the king to look mat certain rights; increased the rights of England nobles but not it…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in Canada, the final court of appeal, and the last legal resort for all litigants; therefore, the Supreme Court of Canada decisions are the ultimate expression and application of Canadian law (Supreme Court of Canada tour). The landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in the R v. Keegstra case regarding the freedom of expression portrays the theoretical concepts behind the court’s ruling as it is the job of the court to deliver a fair decision to the parties involved, as well as a decision that maintains law and order in society. The R v. Keegstra ruling contains insights from the consensus theory and the labelling theory, as the decision of the court was in the interest of the public. To better understand a criminal law case and come up with a conclusion, the theory used must have a valid structure and must follow the rules of critical thinking and logic (Boyd, Cartwright and Heidt, 2015: 120). Also, the purpose of the criminal law must be understood as criminal law serves a purpose, which takes into account some theoretical aspects of the consensus theory and…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “Through the new constitution, Canada codified and affirmed many common-law rights into the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Part I), recognized the treaty rights of aboriginals (Part II), codified equalization (Part III), finally established an indigenous amending formula (Part V), and in the Schedule included some (but not an exhaustive list) of the other Orders-in-Council and Acts of Parliament that form part of the overall Constitution of Canada”. This means that with the new Constitution Act, their have been many parts added to it which give people rights and freedoms. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a guideline to what rights every citizen is allowed. This is important because without these rights, citizens wouldn’t have…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Framers

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For example, several components of English common law were taken into account when building the framework of our government, the most important of which was the Magna Carta, written in the Middle Ages. The Magna Carta introduced two crucial ideas - the idea of equality under the law and the right to a fair trial by jury. The document explicitly says, “to no one will we sell, to no one will we deny, or delay right or justice.” Additionally, the thirty-ninth clause states that no man can be subject to punishment without a fair trial by jury. Additionally, the Framers looked into the philosophies of Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, and Montesquieu.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    5) The English magna Carta was created in 1215 to place limits on the power of the monarch. The law making body of England, Parliament, was depended on the King and Queen to pay for wars as well as the Royal Government. Similar to the deeds of the magna Carta colonial assemblies controlled their colonies funds and had some control over colonial governors. Another model for Americans was the English Bill of Rights taking place during 1689.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rebellion Dbq

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1215, the Magna Carta was signed by King John. The Magna Carta gave his subjects the promise that from now on, he and all future monarchs would try to not harm or potentially harm the citizens of England. This means they will protect their rights of life, liberty, and property. Included within the Magna Carta, it states, “No freemen shall be taken, imprisoned…or in any way destroyed…except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.” Magna Carta was made to calm the English barons who were revolting against King John.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Changes In The 1920s

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Change in the 1920s Gava The 1920s was one of Canada’s most developmental periods, with changes that still impact everyday lives throughout the country. There was mass production of automobiles, which revolutionized transportation and shaped current civilization. Women began to break the gender barrier as the got the right to vote and joined the workplace, leading to early feminism and the way to gender equality.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The supreme court of Canada exists to provide an unbiased body ensuring that the laws of the land uphold the rights and freedoms of the Charter. Though the Supreme Court acts as a system of checks and balances on the executive power of Canada, at what point does the system of the court give the judiciary too great a level of power? When acknowledging the constitutions and legislature in which the Supreme Court justices gain and hold their power, s. 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the lack of equal representation in the court, it is indisputable that the highest court in Canada is overly powerful. It is evident through the examination of court rulings and the systemic practices of the judiciary that the Supreme Court of…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In today’s Canadian society, people are certain that the Criminal justice system with their almighty position and power has the responsibility to protect and serve the community. That being said, the fundamental purpose of the creation of criminal law is to maintain order within society and punish those who deviate beyond the social and legal norms (Robinson & Cahill, 2005). The idea of an innocent individual being wrongfully convicted of a criminal act committed by another person is astounding. The sole purpose of the system is to restrain those who are deemed deviant or mischiefs and are to be held accountable for their actions through the criminal justice system. Therefore, not to restrain the freedom of the individuals who are innocent.…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Canadian courts work together to uphold rights and create checks…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful convictions undermine the Criminal justice system and the procedural structure that is supposed to “uphold” and help deliver justice. Justice is a term that has many different definitions however within the Canadian Justice System, what is Justice? Is justice having criminals being convicted regardless of how evidence was obtained or excluding important evidence based on how it was obtained, which may allow someone who is guilty, to be “free”. The Justice system protects the accused by ensuring that evidence will be attained properly, as well as providing the accused with the right to remain silent and not self-incriminate. These rights are put in place to protect the rights of the accused and to try and prevent wrongful convictions.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of R V Askov

    • 1077 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In past 30 years Canadian courts are struggling with the Charter’s emphasis under section 11(b) that “any person charged with an offence has the right to be tried within a reasonable time”. There has been still not any clarity what is “reasonable time” despite courts has described some factors to determine it. The most important case with reference to reasonableness was R v Askov (1990), where the Supreme Court held (9-0) that accused rights have been violated under section 11 (b) of the Charter. It took 34 months in bringing charges to the trial court; as a result of this charges against the accused were stayed. Courts made it very clear that due to lack of resources, they would not tolerate delays.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays