Magistrates Court

Improved Essays
The Magistrates’ Court is the lowest court in England. It deals mainly with minor criminal such as vandalism and drink driving. All cases begin in the magistrates’ court, and more than 90% of them will be completed there. It also can deal with offences like burglary and drug offences. These are called either-way offences and they can either be heard in the Magistrates’ Court or they can be passed on to the crown court.

The Crown Court deals with more serious criminal acts such as murder and the ones passed on from the magistrates. They can sentence the defendant once they have been found guilty, or for a full trial. It has a judge and a jury. The jury decides if you’re guilty or not and the judge decides what your sentence will be. Some examples of offences are, murder, rape, and robbery. These are referred to as indictable offences. If you
…show more content…
It deals with disputes between different parties. It has the important function of ensuring that European law is interpreted and applied in the same way in every member state. It sits in Luxembourg and is composed of 28 judges, one judge from each member state. There are also 8 Advocate Generals who deliver reasoned opinions on cases to assist the ECJ in making its decisions. The CJEU gives rulings on cases brought before it. It interprets the law (preliminary rulings) – national courts of EU countries are required to ensure EU law is properly applied, but courts in different countries might interpret it differently. If a national court is in doubt about the interpretation or validity of an EU law, it can ask the Court for clarification. It also enforces the law (infringement proceedings) – this type of case is taken against a national government for failing to comply with EU law. Finally, it can annul EU legal acts (actions for annulment) – if an EU act is believed to violate EU treaties or fundamental rights, the Court can be asked to annul

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION This essay examines the Australian court hierarchy, and the extension power the High Court attains as it has the ability too overturn decisions made by the Supreme Court. As it is the final court of appeal therefore reintegrates the point that the power of appointment is held within the body of the High Court. As the Australian Federal system consists of national court and a court system for each individual state and the two territories.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Vocab

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Chapter 6 Vocab: 1. Samuel de Champlain - French explorer who established Quebec on the St. Lawrence River area and became known as the "Father of New France" 2. Huguenots - French Protestants who received limited toleration from the Edict of Nantes 3. coureurs de bois - French beaver hunters and fur traders who were often of mixed Amerindian heritage 4. voyageurs - French-Canadian fur traders and beaver hunters who often recruited Indians 5. Albany Congress - Inter-colonial congress called in 1754 by the British to unify the colonies and assure support from the Iroquois in war against the French.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Select a crime and then find a suitable case that interests you. Newspapers are a great place to start researching for a case - Mohammed Haddara faced Melbourne Magistrates’ Court in the committal hearing (a hearing in the local court before the charge is heard in the district court or Supreme Court) over drug possession and vehicle thefts . Identify the court the case would be heard in. Outline the jurisdiction of this court – criminal, civil, original and appellate – This court has been heard in the Melbourne Magistrates court as a committal hearing. The Magistrates court of Victoria is the lowest court in the Victorian system and is a court of summary jurisdiction .…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most local trials are fought at the county court house within their…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judicial Branch is in charge of interpreting laws and the Constitution, this helps keep checks & balances, it stop Congress from passing bad laws, or just any law that they want to. Alexander Hamilton put it this way, the legislative branch writes the rules that we abide by, while the executive branch “holds the sword of the community” by enforcing the laws (Doc. B). All the judicial branch does is judge whether laws are constitutional, to avoid having a law that violates the Constitution, so it doesn’t pose any harm to the government. It helps keep balance between all the branches and to keep everything…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Campbell (2010) NSWSC 995 Desmond Campbell was found guilty of pushing his wife, Janet Campbell, of six months off a cliff top in the Royal National Park. Desmond pushed Janet from the top of a sheer 50m cliff south of Burning Palms, resulting in her death as she had hit her head on a rick platform below, in March 2005. Elements Of The Offence Before a criminal act can be brought to trial, the police and prosecutors need to prove the elements of a particular offence are present. The elements are; actus reus, mens rea and causation.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court role is to uphold the rules of the law, provide a forum to resolve doubts and find the truth, and to enforce the law in a fair, accurate, and rational way. They also…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    NAME & CASE DETAILS: R v Brent Dreamer was a case heard by the District Court, in which Brent Dreamer had been accused and charged with unlawful stalking. The offence was outlined in section 19AA of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act, 1935. The case was held at a preliminary hearing in the Mount Gambier Magistrates Court, where the defendant elected a trial by jury. The judge that heard the case in the District Court was Judge Boomer. The prosecutor accused Dreamer of unlawful stalking because of the instances described in his hearing, such as constant phone calls and visiting when his presence was unwanted.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Persecution Cases

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The jury is a board of citizens that are put together by the court to heed to evidence, witnesses and decided whether or not to indict or proceed the persecution based upon the evidence being presented. The jury is an important matter in almost every case. Long ago, the juror was a vicinity witnesses who made their judgement base upon what they have knowledge of. The jury breakdown came when society growth has expand it through towns. Which changed the role of jury from community knowledgeable decisions into determination of evidence being presented in court.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Masa Vukotic Case Study

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Supreme Court in each jurisdiction is the highest court in that State or Territory. The Supreme court dealt with this case because the case was a murder criminal case. Most Supreme Courts will conduct jury trials for indictable offences, but this is usually only for very serious offences, such as murder, which the Masa Vukotic case was. Supreme Courts will also hear appeals from lower courts. These appeals may be questions of fact or questions of law.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Court Masques

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages

    You Us We All is a contemporary spin on the classical court masques of the 16th and 17th century. Court masques were a combination of music, drama, dance, and extravagant sets and costumes. These masques were mainly performed for the high nobles and aristocrats in the 16th and 17th centuries throughout Western Europe. This opera is classified as an allegory. According to the Carolina Performing Arts Website, an allegory is defined as a “literary device that conveys often abstract ideas beyond the narrative itself.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the 8th of November I visited Oxford crown court; whilst I had previously attended various levels of courts to witness trials, I had never watched a sentencing. Therefore, intrigued to see the process, I decided to watch the sentencing of Tom Mobey. Immediately upon entering the courtroom I noticed a very different atmosphere to trial, one that was much more private and personal. There was a limited number of people in court: just the two opposing counsel, a clerk, the defendant and his accompanying custody officer. In addition, the defendant was not retained in the dock behind glass, but rather sat in front of it.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their main responsibilities are to interpret the laws Congress passes and ensures they are in accordance with the Constitution. Their job is to hold courts to review all executive actions and laws within their jurisdiction. A recent report of the judicial branch ruling would be updates to a 2014 Court Rule that would shorten the sentences for 26,000 inmates. An independent agency of the federal judicial branch, the U.S. Sentencing Commission, re-assessed the 2014 ruling that changed the drug sentencing guidelines. They retroactively applied the ruling to inmates that where already convicted and sentenced, resulting in shorter prison time for these personnel (2014 Rule Shortens Sentences for 26,000 Inmates, 2016).…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays