An Analysis Of Shakespeare's Hamlet-Madness Or Eccentric Behavior?

Improved Essays
Madness or Eccentric Behavior?
The tragedy of Hamlet is one filled with superbly foolish situations. Riddled with misunderstandings all centering around the antic disposition, madness and sheer stupidity of its characters. It 's very important that we are able to differentiate between these states of mind. We need to be able to categorize each character into each field because it reveals and explains their actions pretty fantastically. So, it is imperative to ask ourselves, who are the mad ones really? Those with vision who refuse to see, or those who see all and blind themselves as a result? Faced with this question, it is clear that Hamlet is not the mad one in this tale rather everyone around him is mad.
The character of whose mental capacity
…show more content…
Because he is living in a backwards social construct where he cannot sanely seek justice. An evil person got his way and now has obtained immunity and because of the rules of loyalty to the crown (even though Claudius himself would have committed treason) it has become excusable. Do not try to justify it with well, maybe the other characters were unaware of exactly what the crimes were that Claudius was capable of? Because there is absolutely no way that the idea that Claudius murdered the king did not cross a single mind but for Hamlet 's. The difference? Hamlet had nothing to lose, making him the only man “mad” enough to seek vengeance. But what 's more mad? Righting a serious wrong to any end, or turning a blind eye to a murderous pervert ruling over …show more content…
This is not true. It is Hamlet 's lack of madness, his true sense, that allows him to see the truth and everyone’s madness is to credit to chalking up Hamlet 's sense to madness. Really, one cannot blame him. Being the only truly sane one of that bunch is bound to make you act out. Especially in Ophelia 's story of Hamlet acting peculiar in particular, this was without a doubt an act of frustration. It is like Hamlet decided to test those around him. If no one was able to see the madness going on right in front of them, then what could they possibly interpret as mad? What could their definition of crazy really be? What could he do to make someone notice that something isn 't

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the play, Hamlet retains the ability to think logically as is demonstrated by his ability to draw conclusions after analyzing a situation. His mental sharpness is also present when he outwits Guildenstern and Rosencrantz. Most importantly, the strongest rebuttal that desecrates the theory that Hamlet is truly crazy revolves around the fact that his madness was not consistent. Hamlet only acts crazy among certain people. Hamlet acts crazy in the presence of Claudius, but he acts perfectly sane when he is alone or with Horatio.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Isn't it possible that Hamlet is both really insane and pretending to be insane? He doesn’t think he is crazy, but his actions suggest otherwise. His behavior throughout the play is erratic; one would expect such actions from a sociopath. For example, after he kills Polonius, he will not reveal the location of the body (Shakespeare 171). Since this act is not aimed at some good, that is strong evidence for his madness.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, people judge on this truth as madness and irrational behavior. If Hamlet seized no response, no reaction at all, if he idly let sins go unmitigated, then he would be a sane human being. Through observing apparent madness and irrational behavior, Shakespeare challenges the audience to define the opposite, sense and rational behavior. In some sense, madness can be observed as evidence of…

    • 1292 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is much evidence in the play that Hamlet deliberately feigned fits of madness in order to confuse and disconcert the king and his attendants. His avowed intention to act "strange or odd" and to "put an antic disposition on" 1 (I. v. 170, 172) is not the only indication. The latter phrase, which is of doubtful interpretation, should be taken in its context and in connection with his other remarks that bear on the same question. To his old friend, Guildenstem, he intimates that "his uncle-father and aunt-mother are deceived," and that he is only "mad north-north-west." (II.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Iago Psychopath Analysis

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Shakespeare’s play Othello, the character Iago is a psychopath. This can be determined by the number of characteristics he shares with those who are clinically defined as psychopaths. Firstly, Iago is extremely manipulative, finding every way possible to use and twist people to his own advantage. He is also very selfish-helping and caring only about himself. Most importantly, Iago’s aptitude for insincere speech is his main asset, as he craftily uses it in every situation.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After even the shortest period of time of gaining power Claudius shows fear and corruption whenever there is a possibility of him losing his power. The greatest example of this in the novel is Hamlet, for Claudius deeply fears losing his power and we know he is above nothing to retain it. Claudius will go to any extent whether it be sending Hamlet to England to be executed, or just trying to poison him. Claudius was easily corruptible another trait of a villain, for if he was a hero, his power would be used towards the betterment of others not in fear that he would lose it. Once corrupted by his elongated possession of power Claudius will stop at nothing to remove any obstacle in the way of him maintaining his power.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hamlet's Tragic Analysis

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Without further consideration, it can be easily concluded that the traumatized boy-prince has suffered so much that he has been driven mad; however, this is not the case. In fact, a more in-depth analysis of the play can serve as a testimony to Hamlet’s mental…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question of whether Hamlet was truly mad or not has sparked many conflicting answers about The Tragedy of Hamlet. However, there is more powerful evidence pointing to the fact that Hamlet is truly mad. As Shakespeare develops his characters, Hamlet seems to become crazier as the play progresses. Hamlet’s true madness is revealed in a number of different ways. A few examples of how Hamlet goes mad are shown when Hamlet ignores Horatio’s warning not to speak to the ghost, when Hamlet shows no remorse for taking a human life, and in the appearance of a ghost that only Hamlet can see.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However that theory does not explain how Horatio knew so much about the Ghost unless, Hamlet explained it to him so well he as well perceived it as a reality. “The spirit that I have seen/ may be the devil, and the devil hath power/ t ' assume a pleasing shape; yea, and perhaps, out of my weakness and my melancholy,/ as he is very potent with such spirits,/ abuses me to damn me.” (II.ii.627-632) Hamlet was arguing with himself to decide if the ghost was actually the ghost of his father of the devil here to tempt him. Which led me to the conclusion that Hamlet was insane and a danger to all of his family and…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet says “How strange or odd some’ver I bear myself, as perchance hereafter shall think meet To put an antic disposition on.” (1.5.170-173). He plans to act mad as part as his scheme for revenge, though Hamlet would have to be an extremely good actor to be able to act the way he did. His behaviour, mood swings and consistently irregular speech patterns show that he could truly be mad, as well as the fact that his moments of clarity become fewer and farther apart. As the play progresses, he starts to have very few times where he acts sane. There is speculation that at first, Hamlet did truly put on an act, but he later got so immersed in his act that he did truly become mad, which explains why his moments of clarity come very few and far apart in the later parts of the play.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays