Macon's Bil The War Analysis

Improved Essays
James Madison served as President Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state and both had Republican views and beliefs. They were confident that in order for America to progress, less government would lead the way to victory. Their position on having a National Bank as well as a large Army and Navy were seen as being unnecessary and could threaten economic liberty. In order to go to war with England it would be imperative for a rapid and massive expansion of the Army and Navy which would require money from the National Bank. The harassment of American shipping increased and continued with both Britain and France, which left Madison with no choice after failure of diplomacy. With the Embargo Act of 1807 and the Nonintercourse Act, which were terrible failures in the efforts to gain American neutrality and were both detrimental to the economy. The next attempt for neutrality Congress passed was Macon’s …show more content…
To start with, Britain did not want to start a war with the US but the actions that the British Navy had taken pushed the US into declaring war on Britain to stop the attacks on American shipping. Britain was already at war with France, but perceived it as an opportunity to join sides with the native people in an effort to win back control of the loyal colonist. Consequently at the end of the war, both territories were mutually restored so nothing really had changed. American shipping was resumed and it gave recognition to America as being a powerful nation as well as clarifying to the politicians in America that having a standing Army and Navy was significant in playing a major role on the world stage. In the end it could be considered that is was morally victorious rather than physically. Britain and France was now an ally to the US and the Indians had become defeated as well as no longer being a threat to the expansion of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One of his reasons that America should be independent is that they were already at war with the British. In his section “Preventing War”, he is saying that freedom from the British empire would only make the relationship with America and Britain better. Because the Britians and the Americans are already at war, America becoming independent and letting the british continue their monarchy rule would only prevent the current war between the two colonies from getting…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Jeffersonians were very pro French while the Federalist had been very pro British. The Federalist hated when the embargo of 1807 was passed because it greatly hurt relations with Britain and also the economy and the trade with them. The Federalist had like England because trade h to pay off the war debts and without it this plan could not be continued. The embargo was one of the largest uses of presidential authority. Even though Jefferson had claimed to be for small government he was willing to go above this if it meant protecting the country.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The British fought with traditional war tactics, did not attempt to change their style of fighting, and were even reluctant to fight in a costly war involving multiple nations whereas America was determined to do whatever it would take to become an independent country and be liberated from British jurisdiction. Britain expected a quick, inexpensive war that would stomp out the flames of the revolution and place America once again firmly under British control. When they realized this was not able to happen, their attitudes changed. The morale of the British soldiers went down. The British only fought to crush the rebellion and return home and when this proved more difficult than they originally imagined, they debated whether or not to give up and even kept fighting only to maintain their dignity.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Similarly, Federalists favored Jay’s Treaty because they hoped to cultivate a stronger relationship with Great Britain. On the other hand, Democratic-Republicans opposed it since they wanted a stronger relationship with France. In regards to the Alien and Sedition Acts, Federalist saw this as a way to stunt the growth of criticism and opposition to their party. However, Democratic-Republicans thought that it jeopardized individuals’ rights. Finally, Federalist favored Hamilton's economic plans, whereas Democratic-Republicans opposed it.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a prime example of why the US should stop their act of being a world police. Those American lives did not need to be lost. Germany and Austria Hungary were fighting a two front war against France, Britain, and Russia and if the US would have not intervened the Germans would have probably still lost the war. Pat Buchanan asks “Why do we tax ourselves to defend rich nations who refuse to defend themselves? Is the security of Europe more important to us than to Europe?” The US gives other countries a false sense of reality that they do not need to defend themselves with their own functioning military, because the United States will do the job for them.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American people were enthusiastic about the new state but Jefferson “worried that the purchase might be unconstitutional. The president pointed out that the Constitution did not specifically authorize the acquisition of vast new territories and the incorporation of thousands of foreign citizens.” (PG. 185) Although he felt his act was unconstitutional he still sent Lewis and Clark to explore the vast territory. Also once he became president he realized we needed a stronger government to take on unexpected challenges, leading him to put money back into the army, which goes against his low spending…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He states that America is not ready for war and would have great difficulty invading nations an ocean away. Axis armies are too large, and battle hardened for the United States to defeat them on their surf. He asked that Americans set an example for the world by peacefully spreading democracy. According to Lindbergh’s testimony on Feb. 6, 1941 before the Senate foreign affairs committee, Lindbergh did not believe the British could win the war. He thought America’s involvement would only prolong the war and increase the destruction in Europe.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the First World War, to avoid being pulled into war, America enacted the first Neutrality Act which prohibited the selling of arms and ammunition to foreign nations. With this act, Woodrow Wilson was able to stay under the radar for the beginning of the First World War, but in the end was forced to fight. Many American’s were against Wilson’s stance on neutrality. They recalled the French assistance in the American Revolution, along with sympathizing with Britain because of many cultural similarities. Britain also controlled a powerful fleet which had set up an economic blockade of Germany.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In turn, the economy suffered greatly, and America’s foreign relationship with Britain was only hurt even more after the American Revolution. (Doc 3) The Spanish were also unwilling to work with the Americans, causing problems on and within the American border.Although John Jay tries to convince the Spanish to allow Americans to use the Mississippi River to bolster trade and economic growth, the Spanish refuse anyway. The Mississippi river was a key landmark in…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Britain and France were at war, both sides were looking for allies, Britain was America’s biggest trading partner, but the French helped the Americans in the war, the problem was clear, whose side should the United States take, or if they should even take sides at all? Washington ended up proclaiming neutral to the war, and it was extremely controversial to the people in the nation. The two “political parties”, The Federalists and the Democratic Republicans took sides to the publication. The Democratic Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson, were completely against the decision. They thought that the nation owed a debt to France because they helped the United States for their help in the Revolution.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays