Macintyre's Argument Of Political Justification

Improved Essays
Needless to say, the above remark suggests that MacIntyre's argument of political justifications rests on providing adequate justification for accepting and upholding the legitimacy of the political authority and for the kind of allegiance that a political society must have from its members, if it is meant to flourish.

to provide adequate justification for

Framed within the constraints set by the flawed foundations of the Enlightenment project, the politics of the modern state is, says MacIntyre (2007), indefensible, incoherent to be rationally justifiable. He thinks that state politics is unable to sustain an adequate account for the authority of its set of institutions, and thereby for citizen's allegiance and obedience to the state (MacIntyre,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The famous political texts Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes and The Second Treatise of Government by John Locke have had a profound impact on what is seen to be the role of government in society, with the latter having more lasting influence, particularly in modern society. The former, in short, argues that men ought to submit themselves and all of their rights to an entity with absolute authority over them, and that no matter how this man, or assembly of men abuses its power, they ought not to resist this entity, as the alternative is a chaotic, violent world. Just by examining the thesis of Hobbes’ work, one would easily deduce that such an idea is contrary to the ideals lauded in our modern society, those being of certain inalienable rights, the rule of law, and the separation/limitation of powers. Locke presents each of these aforementioned ideals and explains them to be essential to governance for the common good.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Enlightenment in Europe there was a revolution in the way Europeans perceived and pondered the state of the world around them. Several Enlightenment philosophers such as John Locke examined the state of humanity and how governments should be structured to reflect this. He had a revelation leading him to the notion that “The state that all people are in naturally…[is] a state of perfect freedom of acting and disposing of their own possessions and persons as they think fit within the bounds of the law of nature… [and] also one of equality in which all power and jurisdiction is reciprocal and no one has more than another” and governments should be structured to reflect this freedom. Locke’s outlook on humanity while sounding simple enough…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuanced Consent Theory

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order for a state to derive its just powers from the consent of the governed, all individuals within the state must be able to give their consent, willingly and autonomously, knowing that to do so, is to incur certain political obligations to said state. They must also understand that in doing so, they also authorise certain actions of the state towards them. In the case of consenting to the UK state, these obligations are mostly in the form of an agreement to obey the law, and the acceptance of any sanctions/punishments the state may consider fit. This essay will argue that the UK cannot derive its just powers from the consent of the governed, as there is no way for the governed to truly give their consent to be obligated to the state.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Modernity of Julius Caesar”, Maynard Mack argues that William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar can still represent society today. Reflecting back on his composition, I started to agree with most of his points. His clear and calculated writing style successfully supports his argument. In addition to his straightforward writing, Mack utilizes the idea of a duality in people to supports his thesis. Subsequently, by using the sentiment of rationality versus irrationality and its consequences, Mack was able to further support this idea.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An Exploration of Utilitarianism When looking at our nation as it is today, it seems almost impossible that there was a time at which we were without a state. The state plays a more active role in our lives today than ever before. All throughout time, many philosophers, as well as everyday people, evaluate whether or not a state is justified, and if it is, who should rule. While most would agree that the state is justified, there are many different ideas as to how much power the state should have, and who should be able to rule. In this paper, I will focus on the Utilitarian argument for the state, a popular objection to Utilitarianism, and my own response as to why this objection is valid.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamiltonian Democracy

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hamilton is one of the most important draftsmen of the “1787 Constitution” whose meaning is the establishment of American political order: making the Funding Father’s idea of institutional arrangement become a stable, recurring pattern of behavior. There are two features of constitution that represent the Hamilton’s idea of institutional arrangement in the realm of politics. Firstly, according to the Constitution, in theory, the President and the Congress play the roles of the complementary representative that political power is divided by dividing the legislative function between them, thus creating a system of “checks and balances” which equalized power. In practice, nevertheless, as the expectation of Hamilton, the gravity of power is prone…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dorinda Outram’s book The Enlightenment contains the chapter “Enlightenment and Government” which highlights that contrary to popular belief, not all philosophes had the same ideas when it came to the ideal government. Outram focuses on the misconceptions people had about the Enlightenment and bring to light the true differences people had about government during this time period. Outram discusses the relationship between the Enlightenment and government, a relationship that has had few research. Through the lives of three leaders in Enlightenment and government John Lock, Baron de Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, it is clear how philosophes greatly differed yet had many similarities in the way they viewed government. John Locke’s view of government is based on the idea that all men are in a state of nature by God; Locke refers to this state as perfect freedom in Second Treatise on Government.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Exile, as something that represents both alienation and enrichment, can be found throughout Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. However, the best example of a character’s experience with exile is Bernard Marx’s emotional detachment from society and his fellow citizens. Bernard’s detachment represents how an emotional exile can isolate one, but can ultimately also enrich one’s life. His detachment also makes clearer the meaning of the work as a whole. From this first chapter, the reader is aware of the significant grasp the state has on society.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke was an English doctor, politician, and philosopher who is widely considered the father of the enlightenment. His ideas of natural rights and a direct constitutional democracy served as a template for many countries’ governments, including our own. In Locke’s ideal system, the government is put in place by the people. It stresses the importance of limiting the government’s power while also ensuring that the government protects the rights of its citizens. Locke’s system is the most effective form of government because it governs by pre-established, published laws, looks out for the common good of the people, and can be overthrown if it rules unfairly.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1579, this document’s year of publication, Western Europe was in the middle of a cultural and intellectual revival known as the Renaissance. An integral component of Renaissance thinking was “natural law”, a moral code applicable to all human beings regardless of social status. Natural law contrasts sharply with absolutism, a form of government in which the ruler has complete governing control over a population and can legislate regardless of the people’s interests. The text appears to be a response to absolutism in Europe that denounces absolute monarchical power, instead favoring humanistic ideas such as natural law and liberty. The author’s implicitly explained background information, his word choice, and the issues addressed imply that…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Enlightenment ideas were highly embodied in the declaration of United State Independence. The major enlightenment ideas highlighted that each and every citizen has the right to reason, autonomy, and the notion that all human beings are equal by nature. In addition, enlightenment ideas stated that the government and religion are separate. In this essay, I will highlight how the different enlightenment ideas were embodied in the declaration of Independence in the United State of America.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anslinger began a dishonest campaign against cannabis that would last over the next eighty years. Conservatives accepted his false claims and continued to spread propaganda that highlighted the dangers of marijuana use and its users. However, although some conservatives may have been motivated by greed and racism, others believed that they were doing the right thing according to their system of moral beliefs. In Moral Politics, George Lakoff explores “two different models of ideal family life [that] motivates corresponding sets of metaphorical priorities, each of which constitutes a distinct moral system” (65).…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau strongly differ on their view of the purpose of the state. Hobbes sees the state as a positive institution that creates order and sows peace. Rousseau sees the state as an institution of chains, that renders it’s citizens salves to the will of the majority. Before reaching these conclusions they argue on the base nature of man. Hobbes argues that self preservation is the base of human nature whereas Rousseau argues it is property.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of man and the state of nature have varied and contrast immensely throughout different societies. Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau’s ideas about the state of man clash in the form of politics and social contracts. Locke’s view involves the power residing within the people, and the government is there to protect their property, life, and liberty. Hobbes’ ideas are in favor of a monarchy in order to keep the citizens secure and free from harm. Rousseau’s ideas on the politics shares a collective will amongst the population.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many political philosopher’s eyes, there is a special relationship between the ideas of moral goodness and legitimate authority. Some of these political philosophers believed that the use of political power was only morally correct if it was exercised under a ruler who had virtuous morals. These rulers who had virtuous morals were then told that in order to be successful, they needed to make decisions in accordance with the standards of ethical goodness. This moralistic view of authority is what Machiavelli criticizes in his work “The Prince.” In Machiavelli’s book, “The Prince,” the readers are introduced to political values that do not necessarily give full recognition to morality or religion.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays