Machiavelli's The Prince

Improved Essays
Machiavelli was an Italian historian, politician, philosopher, humanist and writer who is well known as the founder of early political science. One of his most known books The Prince, is considered to be one of the most important nonfiction literature written in history. It gives an accurate and a truthful description of the method on governing. Elizabeth I of England was a Machiavellian leader. She was a ruler of vast intelligence, ability and success. She displayed her power by playing by her own rules in matters of love for her people, her country, and her life. “It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both”. Machiavelli says love is within us, it is a feeling that you can chose to feel and it is one that you can turn on …show more content…
They avenge light offenses: they cannot avenge serve ones: hence, the harm one does to a man must be such as to obviate any fear of revenge”. In this quotation, Machiavelli is revealing logical reasoning clearly without any of moral factors. He is referring to a situation where the Prince would have two choices or paths to make. The two choices are humanity and destruction. If the Prince chooses to be destructive, he would be making the sacrifice of losing his people as well as their trust. Machiavelli accentuates the importance of the Prince’s originality and what path he should chose. He believes he should choose the destruction path only if he is sure there will be no consequences and that the destruction will not eliminate parties that may want to seek revenge. Elizabeth showed this method when her and her advisors did not attack the puritans. Puritans were Protestants who wanted to purify the English Church of its ceremonial connection with Catholic practices and its network of church government, which mirrored Catholicism. In her foreign policy, Elizabeth was careful trying to avoid wars that would cost her, while supporting other causes that would help both Protestantism and England. Elizabeth made sure the path that she chose would not cost her the trust of her people and unwanted

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince is a guide on how a proper prince should rule his nation. Machiavelli demonstrates how the past rulers have either been successful or not. Even as his audience were that of monarchs, many of his teachings’ outcomes can be seen in present day. In chapter 12, Machiavelli comments on the usage of mercenary troops.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In one section of the article, Vincent Barnett discusses some of the alternative ways that Machiavelli’s The Prince can be interpreted. One interpretation was that Machiavelli possibly intended for his writing to be satirical, because certain facts, such as how Machiavelli had a family, refute his statement from the pamphlet that he believes all humans are evil. Also, it is possible that Machiavelli didn’t actually agree with the ideas in his writing, but he only wrote those things to gain favor from the leaders of his time. These are just possibilities, but knowing about Machiavelli’s life and his situation are important in order to understand his motives for writing The Prince. Just like Machiavelli, present-day leaders and authors make…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Elizabeth I Dbq

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Elizabeth was a ruler who cared deeply about her nation, she was always willing to make compromises that would keep nations at peace. Elizabeth was determined, dedicated, decisive and compassionate about her nation. If Elizabeth had a plan that she knew would benefit her nation, she would not let anything get in her way. Elizabeth wanted to create a united church that all English people could worship, she wanted to meet everyone's needs. This illustrates how Elizabeth was able to be a powerful and effective ruler through being able to deal with religious strife.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth The First Dbq

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As Elizabeth the First tried to convert her country to be a moderate Protestant state, she upset conservative Catholics. This is a bias statement because the author is Roman Catholic and during this time period, middle of the Sixteenth Century, there were religious disagreements between Protestants and Catholics. There was a newly Protestant England while many Catholics tried to keep Catholicism in the area, leading to the Catholic or Counter Reformation . Additionally, in Elizabeth the Firsts speech to the Parliament (Doc 7) she states that she does need male influence or help in her rule. She importantly states to her nation that she does not need a husband to control her, instead she needs to be committed to her country and that she is “married to the country”.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli is not taking any sides. He just trying to bring the elites and the people together because both relies on each other. In political power, the people have the power to choose their leader while the leader benefits from the people. The ruler can use the people for an army. In which, the ruler can use in his personal gains and needs.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Machiavelli’s writing “How a Prince Should Keep His Word”, Machiavelli states that the princes that have kept their word are the ones that do the little and care the less about keeping their promises. Machiavelli then proclaims two means of fighting. A prince may then fight with force or through the animals. A man also must know the nature of fighting between an animal and another man. This action commenced through the ancient writers illogically.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli and The Prince Introduction Niccolo Machiavelli is a famous statesman, thinker and one of the founders of modern political science. He was born in the year 1469 at Florence. That is the age of political chaos. The whole country was separated to city governments。In this case, he wrote his masterpiece, The Price, which to be as much praised as blamed. Machiavelli used terse and forceful words elaborate his argument, which had a profound influence in history.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) was an Italian historian, philosopher, writer, politician and diplomatic. He based his knowledge on the vernacular literary tradition and the Latin classics, using them not in a formal way but as models of life and political behaviour. Machiavelli was against the ideas of Savonarola, the very strict Dominican friar of the city of Florence, who had an important power during the rule of Lorenzo de' Medici. Years after Savonarola’s death (1498), Machiavelli became Secretary of the Second Chancellery of the Florentine republic. He was responsible of the correspondence related to the administration of the state and foreign relations which will allow him to do several international diplomatic trips.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli in The Prince is primarily a practical observer and diplomat analyst prescribing numerous ethical and political instructions to Cesar Borgia for pyramidical maintenance, sustenance and enhancement of political power at various stages of capturing, nurturing, preserving and augmenting power and absolute power for the prince. Hobbes’s aim in his Leviathan is similar to that of Machiavelli’s The Prince. Both are equally concerned for bringing about order out of chaotic civil war like situation in England and arbitrary ruler in Italy respectively. Hobbes is making an all-out effort to create an edifice and basis of scientific foundation for the need of a sovereign power through his so called scientific materialism. That is why he discusses at length human nature, psyche and need for sociological order in society.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Machiavellian ruler is someone who leads with the primary goal of maintaining and enforcing his position. He manipulates, deceives, and is typically feared by his subjects. Furthermore, in The Prince he knows of elevated qualities but will decide to engage in cunning and without morality making him untrustworthy. Additionally, he believes in the power of his army and puts much effort, money and time into this pursuit to further establish his sovereignty.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. What are the diverse kinds of territories? There are two sorts of territories as indicated by Machiavelli. They are genetic territories and new realms. To characterize innate realms didn't strike Machiavelli, so there is some disagreement regarding guidelines to be utilized to figure out what constitutes a genetic territory.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Machiavelli writes on how a prince is to take power and how to maintain his position (Ryan, 2012, p.364). The concept of virtù is introduced, as an essential component that a prince must possess. It could be translated as the ability, quality or determination that secures political success (Ryan, 2012, p.375). Machiavelli finds an example of a virtuous prince in Cesare Borgia, described as a skillful leader who was only defeated by the negative effects of fortuna (Ryan, 2012, p.371). On the other hand, Agathocles is presented as a tyrant, whose form of ruling was dishonorable.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli believes that the ruler must take things into his hands and not depend on God to help him rule. The ruler has to work and be worthy of the…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Growing up in such a tumultuous era allowed Niccolò Machiavelli to examine many cases of the rise and subsequent fall of short-lived governments as well as their causes, such as constantly changing alliances. These experiences led to a cynical view of human nature along with a clear understanding of the objectionable behavior necessary to retain power in politics. His career as a politician and diplomat cemented his very pragmatic stance on human nature and the nature of politics, both of which are described throughout The Prince. Unlike fellow philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle, who preferred to hypothesize based on ideals, Machiavelli held the contentious belief that a separation between politics and moral philosophy was the necessary…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At face value, The Prince and the Discourses seem to have a conflicting nature, but both texts focus on the administration of a state and present textual similarities. Much of what Machiavelli writes in The Prince reinforces the Discourses, echoing both stylistically and thematically. Machiavelli uses pragmatic methods in both and accentuates the importance of historical studies. In The Prince, there is a significant amount of reference to Cesare Borgia, a man that Machiavelli admires, and he states, “I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions,” and his views on virtue and fortune come out of Borgia’s narrative . For Machiavelli, Borgia is the superlative example of a man who can compel any individual to do the distasteful…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays