Machiavelli's Guide To Political Power

Improved Essays
In his guide to obtaining political power, The Prince, Machiavelli asserted that effective leadership comes only through instilling fear in one’s subjects rather than promoting a loving environment. Machiavelli appears to ignore the powerful combination that fear and love create when put together: respect. In order to become a successful leader, cultivating respect among one’s followers is far more advantageous than choosing fear or love alone. Both fear and love are relatively easy to establish among a population, but are prone to escaping one’s control. Fear becomes almost synonymous with hate when it is utilized by an inept ruler and can quickly lead to revolt. Take for example Idi Amin, self-proclaimed “president for life” of Uganda who

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Purpose of Government and if It Fails Machiavelli thinks that the most important feature of the government is to provide prosperity and stability, while Locke thinks it is the preservation of the property and the property rights, which go beyond the protection of the physical properties. Both men start from the same assumption that the government is able to provide its people with a possibility of coexistence and mutual respect for the future. Both men agree that, although coming from different angle, a government has a purpose, and if it fails to uphold the purpose, the subjects or the people can reconstitute the government. Machiavelli theorizes that the people in the state of nature (he thinks it as an individualistic setting "like…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Subdue the Senate: Machiavelli’s Way of Freedom or Path to Tyranny” author John P. McCormick sets out to make the distinction between tyranny and civic leadership. McCormick states that Machiavelli “was fully aware of the tension between leaderly initiative and popular rule…” McCormick points out the conflict in Machiavelli’s argument by stating “How can a single individual follow Machiavelli's advice about favoring the people over the few without becoming a tyrant in the process?” he goes on to argue that if a leader can achieve this then the next obstacle is how this same leader can avoid catering to the elite or the grandi as Machiavelli referred to them. In the article McCormick argues that Machiavelli “advises astute leaders…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, the manner in which Machiavelli’s theory originated from was his study of history, allowing him to draw conclusions about what is inherent in human nature through past human acts. Humans, to a certain extent, are self-interested, although they can be easily won or lost. In times of trouble, man turns egotistical and look for a leg up within adversity; in times of prosperity, they are trustworthy and loyal to their ruler. Posing a famous political dilemma, Machiavelli asks whether “it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse” (Chapter XVII). Because he believes man becomes disloyal to the state when times are tough, and the ultimate purpose of the Prince is to maintain order within the state, Machiavelli argues a ruler should be feared.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People are powerful in any political system; it is just how much powerful they are that the kind of the government determines. In the principality, people are powerful because in order to become a prince and keep the principality in glory for a long time “it is necessary for a prince to have the friendship of the people; otherwise he has no remedy in times of adversity.” (Machiavelli, The Prince, p. 33) This rule is also applicable to the composite principalities where “no matter how powerful one’s armies, in order to enter a country one needs the goodwill of the inhabitants.” (Machiavelli, The Prince, p. 6)…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘In the social sciences, the most general concept of power links it to the ability to achieve a desired outcome’ (Heywood 2004). Power is a heavily contested concept amongst humans and has always been present within political thought throughout all eras. It is, in most cases, outlined as the capability to impose authority upon both individuals, and the masses within a state or territorial region, in order to control or influence decisions and their effects. This essay will discuss the similarities in the analysis of political power between two key philosophers from the 16th and 17th century who are thought to have founded features of modern-day political science. Both Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes specialised in theorising the idea…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli is the “heir… to civic humanism” because he is keenly aware that any advice towards the ruling elite may be seen as a threat, and so he must validate his opinions through the use of examples from romanticized ancient Rome and Greece to show that his opinions were not an issue, but the truth behind them which would remain true even at his death or expulsion threatened the stability of any government. As is the case with Renaissance humanism, Machiavelli drew comparisons from knowledge of the ancient world to the world in which he lived, evaluating each based on each other. He took particular interest in the actions of the leaders, specifically the key points in history which led to their rise to and fall from power. He attempts to create rules or guidelines for future leaders to follow based on any consistencies he saw, giving him the title of “heir…to civic humanism.” Without further inquiry here it is impossible to say to what extent Machiavelli romanticized the ancient times, as he may have been picking and choosing stories which best aligned with his views, omitting contrary evidence, or he may have been using all the works available to him at the time.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since human beings first started to roam the Earth, there have always been hierarchies within our small communities and large societies. These social structures have helped lead civilizations by making difficult decisions that would hopefully be advantageous to the masses and to give their respective community some security and stability in their lives. Technically, you could call this group of people a government. For centuries on end, governments have been equally analyzed as well as criticized plus we have been given innumerable perspectives on this extremely broad topic. With that being said, there are five main philosophers who gave their input about politics, humanity and society.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout ages there have comparatively been more leaders using fear and less of those using love and a very low amount of those who managed to combine. By inspiring fear for instance Stalin was killing his own people while Hitler was killing foreigners. Both of those leaders were about to gain respect and confidence in peoples’ eyes that the way chosen by a head of the state is unambiguous and could not be disputed. Author of ‘The Prince’ insisted that even if the head by its nature cannot have all the virtues, he should give the impression that they are all inherent to him. Fear is the easiest way to prove so, while love is the toughest but right.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli's Summary

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages

    PART A. IDENTIFICATIONS 3. “This division of labor, from which so many advantages are derived, is not originally the effect of any human wisdom…it is the necessary consequence of a certain propensity in human nature…to truck, barter and exchange one thing for another.” Adam Smith (pg.21) - In this quote, Adam Smith introduces the idea that although the specialization of skills in division of labor leads to efficiency when it comes to production, this is bad for the people because they lose other skills. People are so focused on their specialty that their other skills are not improved upon and start to deteriorate so they become good for one thing, their specialty.…

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The way to have power is to take it.” These were the words of a man that was rated one of the top ten most corrupt US politicians of all time by Real Clear Politics. A corrupt leader could be considered a Machiavellian. Dictionary.com describes a Machiavellian as someone who follows the principles analyzed and described in The Prince. The Prince, is a book written in in 1513 by Niccolo Machiavelli that was dedicated to the Magnificent Lorenzo de' Medici.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the written work “The Prince” by Niccolo Machiavelli the author elaborates on how a prince can only be a strong leader if he engages in duplicity. Machiavelli focused on a more realistic and immoral strategy to keep the people of his time unified, realpolitik a system based on practical rather than moral considerations. The author, Niccolo Machiavelli, goes through great depths to explain why it takes rulers who are “cruel, dishonest, duplicitous, and manipulative.” There are many great examples to prove his ideology, however, the writing is very subjective and bias as Machiavelli does not give a rebuttal to the different kinds of ruling. He writes “The Prince” after the current leading family of his time falls in order to keep the stability…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli spent a large majority of his aristocratic platform defaming the many intrinsic characteristics of human emotion and experience. He consciously ignored the essential acts of care and compassion while promoting a message of fear and hate. His teachings offered detailed instructions on the succession and maintenance of a fear-abiding society encapsulated by submission. His philosophy stated that the best interest of the general public was to irrefutably follow the rule of law. To Machiavelli, a human life could be explained as an expendable resource, awaiting its designated task to serve the ruling class.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natural inability for a leader to simultaneously act in a morally pure manner and preside over successful governance leads Machiavelli to advise that the Prince must embody duplicity and deviousness in order to triumph. Machiavelli vehemently states that incorruptible leaders who exclusively promote righteousness leave themselves vulnerable to subversion by cunning forces, which is against the interests of the ruler and the state. Importantly, Machiavelli states that the ability for leaders to achieve glory and virtù is enhanced if leaders are unshackled from commitments of upholding moral values. In arguing that the Prince should learn how ‘not to be good’, Machiavelli is not insisting that it is acceptable for a leader to be reprehensibly…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many political philosopher’s eyes, there is a special relationship between the ideas of moral goodness and legitimate authority. Some of these political philosophers believed that the use of political power was only morally correct if it was exercised under a ruler who had virtuous morals. These rulers who had virtuous morals were then told that in order to be successful, they needed to make decisions in accordance with the standards of ethical goodness. This moralistic view of authority is what Machiavelli criticizes in his work “The Prince.” In Machiavelli’s book, “The Prince,” the readers are introduced to political values that do not necessarily give full recognition to morality or religion.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays