Machiavelli's Duty In The Prince Essay

Improved Essays
According to Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince, The first duty of a prince is to maintain power and acquire more. If the princes of Machiavelli’s time followed his advice and searched only for power, what does this mean for the people? The first priority of a prince or ruler should be to improve the kingdom and protect the citizens. Machiavelli stated that one’s duty, as a prince is to be as powerful as can be, however, as a ruler the first priority should be the people, and as a prince, to be selfless, good, and wise. Machiavelli hinted in his strong statement of duty, that the princes of his time should put their selfish desires ahead of the people’s welfare. On the contrary, the person in power should be selfless to his kingdom and act for the good of the people. If he employs the philosophy of Machiavelli and decides for his own pleasure to gain more power, he wouldn’t be suitable to rule not even the smallest of towns. The role of a ruler is a very sacrificing and …show more content…
A ruler is for the people. In the catechism of the Catholic Church, it blatantly says, “Authority is exercised legitimately only when it seeks the common good of the group concerned and if it employs morally licit means to attain it.” The sovereign is to help and keep the subjects in focus in the goal for the kingdom: The people won’t respect or want to fight for a cruel and selfish king. And while the king may think his fight is elsewhere, his kingdom will start to crumble from the inside out. This is what happened to Rome in the time of one of the world’s cruelest emperor’s, Nero. He was a king who was only in it for himself. He wanted power and wealth and didn’t care in the slightest if his people were to perish. Rome was such a beautiful nation, but when placed in the wrong hands of a self-centered ruler Rome fell easily. The once stunning and respected city soon became ruins before the eyes of the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli and Socrates Would Not Support the Same Prince While both Socrates and Niccolo Machiavelli grew up in times of political turmoil and economic instability, Socrates would not be supportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a good prince. Their concepts of an effective ruler are completely different – the extent of their similarities are their experiences with political fragmentation and war. Both aim to establish a long-lasting government, but Machiavelli believes a ruthless ruler without regard to morality is needed, while Socrates would suggest a virtuous ruler is vital to establishing a stable government. In The Prince And the Discourses, Machiavelli articulates what makes a good ruler and provides guidelines for how they should rule.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Italian cities, there was much conflict and arguments amongst the Borgia family who were focused on trying to seize and maintain power. Machiavelli in response, devised a text, The Prince, which illustrates how to run an effectual government. In The Prince, he also describes how the good and effective rulers have to learn “not to be good,” and that they have to be prepared and willing to put aside ethical concerns of justice and kindness, in order to preserve the balance of the state. This logic was atrocious to peers around him, for they were used to the old medieval ideas of ruling where the king was chosen by God to serve as someone on earth, who manages the law. They also saw that the ruler/king was an all-powerful human being with…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, philosophers, kings, and leaders have all had different, conflicting views on how empires and kingdoms run effectively. Countries fight entire wars over the chance to instill the “correct” way of governing onto another people. Arguably, Fidel Castro created one of the most successful socialist governments in world history, yet the United States disagreed with his ‘communist ways’ and ended his regime. In the mid-20th century, Germans elected a man who established stable government within their country, but who also ultimately led them to the largest and most well known genocide in written history. People enjoy being right, and telling others how they should run their lives, families, and countries.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This much power was a lot for one man to possess. With this sole form of government there is no check or balance on the king’s power; he answers to himself alone. It is for these reasons that a monarchy is not always the best form…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli wrote ‘The Prince’ to tell others how he sees a good prince. He says a prince “in order to hold his position, must acquire the power to be not good, and understand when to use it and when not to use it, in accord with necessity” (The Prince ch15). He didn’t believe that humans are perfect because “But because no ruler can possess or fully practice them, on account of human conditions that do not permit it, he needs to be so prudent that he escapes ill repute for such vices as might take his position away from him, and that he protects himself from such as will not take it away if he can; if he cannot, with little concern he passes over the letter vices” (The Prince ch15). I used that quote because Machiavelli is saying no one…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli in The Prince is primarily a practical observer and diplomat analyst prescribing numerous ethical and political instructions to Cesar Borgia for pyramidical maintenance, sustenance and enhancement of political power at various stages of capturing, nurturing, preserving and augmenting power and absolute power for the prince. Hobbes’s aim in his Leviathan is similar to that of Machiavelli’s The Prince. Both are equally concerned for bringing about order out of chaotic civil war like situation in England and arbitrary ruler in Italy respectively. Hobbes is making an all-out effort to create an edifice and basis of scientific foundation for the need of a sovereign power through his so called scientific materialism. That is why he discusses at length human nature, psyche and need for sociological order in society.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli’s The Prince "The Prince" was published after Nicolo Machiavelli’s death. The book consists of an introduction and twenty-six chapters. Machiavelli discussed the question of the state power on. He aimed to analyze the historical experience on the example of the conquests of Alexander the Great. Trying to describe the essence of the state, he outlined his vision of the role of citizens in the state and strength criteria for a given power.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli spent a large majority of his aristocratic platform defaming the many intrinsic characteristics of human emotion and experience. He consciously ignored the essential acts of care and compassion while promoting a message of fear and hate. His teachings offered detailed instructions on the succession and maintenance of a fear-abiding society encapsulated by submission. His philosophy stated that the best interest of the general public was to irrefutably follow the rule of law. To Machiavelli, a human life could be explained as an expendable resource, awaiting its designated task to serve the ruling class.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    72). In other words, we would like to believe that humans always act on behalf of goodness and the benefit of others, but as history has proven numerous times, this is simply not the case. Ideally, loyalty would be unwavering and laws would govern suffice, eliminating the need to resort to force. It is for this precise reason that Machiavelli adopts the contentious beliefs still debated today. His views are not necessarily cynical, but a product of the reality of his…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At face value, The Prince and the Discourses seem to have a conflicting nature, but both texts focus on the administration of a state and present textual similarities. Much of what Machiavelli writes in The Prince reinforces the Discourses, echoing both stylistically and thematically. Machiavelli uses pragmatic methods in both and accentuates the importance of historical studies. In The Prince, there is a significant amount of reference to Cesare Borgia, a man that Machiavelli admires, and he states, “I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions,” and his views on virtue and fortune come out of Borgia’s narrative . For Machiavelli, Borgia is the superlative example of a man who can compel any individual to do the distasteful…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ” This strategy works because: “Everyone sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them;” “It is unnecessary for a prince to have all the good qualities I have enumerated, but it is very necessary to appear to have them.” Machiavelli goes on to say that to truly be “merciful, faithful, humane, religious, upright” Everyone admits how praiseworthy it is in a prince to keep faith, and to live with integrity and not with…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many political philosopher’s eyes, there is a special relationship between the ideas of moral goodness and legitimate authority. Some of these political philosophers believed that the use of political power was only morally correct if it was exercised under a ruler who had virtuous morals. These rulers who had virtuous morals were then told that in order to be successful, they needed to make decisions in accordance with the standards of ethical goodness. This moralistic view of authority is what Machiavelli criticizes in his work “The Prince.” In Machiavelli’s book, “The Prince,” the readers are introduced to political values that do not necessarily give full recognition to morality or religion.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The idea of the power sovereign should have and how they obtain this power is a large part of Machiavelli’s philosophy. Machiavelli justifies the sovereign’s search for power by stating, “The desire to acquire possessions is a very natural and ordinary thing, and when those men do it who can do so successfully, they are always praised and not blamed…” (Page 12). Machiavelli continues by explaining how the stronger the ruler, the more land he may be able to conquer and how he has every right to take more land from weak rulers. However the ability to keep this power comes from the relationship between the sovereign and their people.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays