Schwitzgebel discusses that Flanagan and Bloom's cases against empathy and anger are mainly practical or instrumental and the results are uncanny. He suggested that pushing back against the idea that we should narrow the emotional range of our lives by rejecting empathy and anger. Schwitzgebel suggests that a rich, complex, multi-layered society of loves and hates, victories and losses, art and philosophy, history, athletics, science, music, literature, feats of engineering, great achievements and great failures. He also cares about the negative emotions with destructive emotions in the world. Schwitzgebel does not agree with the Buddhist way it will lead to a lesser world and will lose the complexity and richness of life.…