Machiavellian Ruler: Ivan The Terrible

Improved Essays
Machiavellian Ruler, Ivan the Terrible Ivan Vasilyevich, Ivan IV, was a Machiavellian ruler called to the throne at the age of three after his father’s death; however, his mother, Yelena Glinskaya, ruled as a surrogate until her death in 1538. Later on, Ivan IV was crowned as Russia’s ruler on January 16, 1547 (Andryev). Later, during the constructive period of Ivan’s reign, he issued many reforms involving self-government, taxes, and religion (“Ivan the Terrible”). After this seemingly calm time, Ivan IV’s iconic rule truly began with the death of his wife, Anastasia (Shaposhnik 75). Ivan IV, later known as Ivan the Terrible, exhibited the qualities of a Machiavellian ruler, because he had extensive military knowledge, because he weakened a stronger force, the nobility, to gain power himself, and because was more feared by his subjects feared than loved. Ivan IV, the Machiavellian ruler, possessed knowledge of military leadership, which he showed during his conquests to annex free lands near Russia. Machiavelli taught, “a prince must have no other objective, no …show more content…
Ivan IV became known as “Ivan the Terrible” later in his life because of extreme paranoia and harsh leadership; the ruthlessness exampled by Ivan IV caused the citizens of Russia to fear him more than love him which makes him a Machiavellian ruler. Over the course of his reign, Ivan IV executed entire towns for treason, murdered his only heir, and blinded the architect of St. Basil’s Cathedral (Shaposhnik 76). Again, Machiavelli’s writing supports that Ivan IV was a Machiavellian ruler because the author writes that if a person must choose between fear and love, he will find a greater security in fear (66). Ivan IV followed this teaching of Machiavelli and guaranteed his throne until his death by a heart attack (“Ivan the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Man Who Left a Huge Impact; Peter the Great Peter I, the second-crowned czar of Russia, was the most efficient ruler of Russia. Also known as Peter the Great, he died February 8, 1725. Peter ruled from May 7, 1682 until November 2, 1721. Peter is the son of Alexis of Russia and Natalya Naryshkina. In 1689, Peter married his first wife, chosen by his mother, Eudoxia Lopukhina, however after nine years, Peter decided that he really was not in love with his wife, and he got divorced.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan gained and established the tradition of absolute rule in 1564. He assigned a master to peasants, and introduced laws that limited…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter the Great was also an absolutist leader. Peter the Great strived for a powerful military force in Russia and he achieved this by raising taxes which resulted in imposing additional burdens on the Russian peasants. He…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan Iv's New Russia

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Ivan IV eagerly embraced his new Russia, which he fancied as the “Third Rome” and named himself Tsar, the Russian version of the Roman and Byzantine emperor title of Caesar. Ivan IV eagerly embraced his new Russia, which he fancied as the “Third Rome” and named himself Tsar, the Russian version of the Roman and Byzantine emperor title of Caesar. Ivan IV eagerly embraced his new Russia, which he fancied as the “Third Rome” and named himself Tsar, the Russian version of the Roman and Byzantine emperor title of Caesar. Ivan IV eagerly embraced his new Russia, which he fancied as the “Third Rome” and named himself Tsar, the Russian version of the Roman and Byzantine emperor title of Caesar. Ivan IV eagerly embraced his new Russia, which he…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan IV or Ivan the Terrible was born in 1530 in Moscow Russia. Ivan was the first to have Czar as his official title as well as the Grand Duke of Moscow. Not much is known of Ivan’s early years except that his father, Vasily III, died when Ivan was three and his mother, Jelena Glinsky, died when he was Eight. After his parents died the members of the nobility treated Ivan very poorly with lack of nourishment and with lack of love. Ivan’s terribleness is sought to have came from his childhood.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccoló Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513 after witnessing Italy's political decline. In this book he highlights how a ruler can maintain his power and lead an effective government by any means necessary. Compared to Louis XI of France, Isabella and Ferdinand of Spain, Henry VII is the most Machiavellian…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many people think of brutality and ruthlessness when discussing Ivan the Terrible. Although he was cruel and ruthless during his reign, Ivan IV, as he was formally known, did implement some lasting reforms for his country. There were many events, some tragic, in his life that greatly affected him and would ultimately have profound consequences during his reign. Ivan the Terrible was the Grand Prince of Moscow from 1533-1547 and called himself “Tsar of All of the Russians” until his death in 1584. He inherited the title of Grand Prince of Moscow at an early age which greatly affected how he ruled.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many see this as wrong, without a leader with the same views of Machiavelli, we could possible end up destroying ourselves because we think we know what is best. Tarltron explains this theoretical stance, “The view that The Prince was simply an exercise in practical political wisdom rooted in an historical theory of imitable examples can no longer be treated as indisputable.” (Tarlton) Between the two, it would seem that neither would work in today’s socially accepted rulers…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nicholas II played a vital, negative role in contributing to his complete downfall during the early 20th century. His reluctance to become Tsar was a major factor that contributed to his own demise. The release of the October Manifesto in 1905 was one of the key events that led to the end of Tsar Nicholas’s rule over Russia. Tsar Nicholas’s poor leadership in World War 1 as well as his weak-willed personality was also issues that further contributed to the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty. These factors and events severely influenced the political, social and economic aspects of his ruling .The…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The revolution happened because I didn’t kill him in time to stop it” Felix Yusupov How far did the political and personal influence exerted by Rasputin lead to the downfall of Tsarist Russia?  General information on this topic Nicholas II of Russia was the last emperor of Russia (1st November 1894 to 15th March 1917). His reign saw the dramatic fall of the imperial Russian empire. After the Febuary revolution of 1917 Nicholas was forced to abdicate the throne. In 1918, Nicholas and his family were tragically executed by the Bolsheviks.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For hundreds of years, civilizations have depended on rulers to manage the people and prevent anarchy from erupting. While some leaders execute these actions with ease, others fail to do so and often lose their states to opposing rulers or forces. Niccoló Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher who lived from 1469 to 1527, describes in his book, The Prince, the characteristics he deems necessary in a strong ruler. Throughout the book, Machiavelli uses leaders of his time, like Cesare Borgia and King Louis XII, as examples of what a person should or should not do in order to maintain or improve his state. However, a more recent leader who exemplifies the qualities outlined by Machiavelli is King Louis XIV of France, as he was content with being…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the written work “The Prince” by Niccolo Machiavelli the author elaborates on how a prince can only be a strong leader if he engages in duplicity. Machiavelli focused on a more realistic and immoral strategy to keep the people of his time unified, realpolitik a system based on practical rather than moral considerations. The author, Niccolo Machiavelli, goes through great depths to explain why it takes rulers who are “cruel, dishonest, duplicitous, and manipulative.” There are many great examples to prove his ideology, however, the writing is very subjective and bias as Machiavelli does not give a rebuttal to the different kinds of ruling. He writes “The Prince” after the current leading family of his time falls in order to keep the stability…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli spent a large majority of his aristocratic platform defaming the many intrinsic characteristics of human emotion and experience. He consciously ignored the essential acts of care and compassion while promoting a message of fear and hate. His teachings offered detailed instructions on the succession and maintenance of a fear-abiding society encapsulated by submission. His philosophy stated that the best interest of the general public was to irrefutably follow the rule of law. To Machiavelli, a human life could be explained as an expendable resource, awaiting its designated task to serve the ruling class.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays