Human Nature Of Government

Improved Essays
The Human Nature and its Relation with the Existence of a Government

Politics is everywhere. As a matter of fact, it can be synonymous with authority, conflict and competition. When one has power, he has the ability to let others follow his schema. Sometimes, one seeks to acquire and maintain power to the extent that he competes with the others which later on results to conflict. This idea is still evident nowadays. However, our world has a different view and taste in politics at this instant. Today, politics have become a much bombarded term. It has a mixture of what once was, what is, what is to be. Politics is directly associated with corruption, killing, vote-buying, ill-gotten wealth, lack of political will, and the like. Politics per
…show more content…
A very responsive government does not only protect the rights of its people but it also promotes the general welfare of the latter. Primarily, the government exists because the people created it. It is a mechanism where the affairs of the state are enforced and are regulated. It is the agency of the state by which its will is formulated, expressed, and is brought into reality. Our present type of government and politics has evolved over time. We have different types of government—may it be presidential or parliamentary, unitary or federal, or a government that upholds a democratic society. But there is still one question that remains to be answered despite all of these progress and alteration. Hence, it is the paramount yearning of this paper to assess the relationship of the human nature with the government and its establishment. Furthermore, this paper argues that the human nature and behavior of …show more content…
Machiavelli considers that a ruler governs his constituents using different strategies, considering that people have different personalities and interests. The ruler uses variety of emotions like love, hatred, fear, and cruelty. People behave well when they are governed well. For Machiavelli, a ruler must know when to apply law and when to apply violence and inflict fear. When one is obedient and is submissive to the policies promulgated, the law must apply. If one is behaving like a brute, stringent discipline must be made in order to inflict fear and reverence. Likewise, Machiavelli believes that when a ruler gains the trust and love of the people, it is expected that the latter will support him and his end for the advancement of the good of the society. This is how a person maintains political power. However, Locke criticizes Machiavelli’s work. For Locke, the government should encompass the manner of fair play and equity. In order for the government to survive, it must serve the best interest of the people. If it is not addressing the needs of the people, then the citizens have all the right to rebel and overthrow the government. Locke who believes that people are inherently good shares the same sentiment with Machiavelli who, on the other hand, believes that people should be controlled because there are inclinations that they become selfish and greedy. Locke

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    These natural laws may seem contradictory when used as a means to support justified warfare, how can the right to life be taken away? The reasoning comes from the idea that some claims to power are unjust and that men have the right and obligation to protect there and others rights. When someone rules for self interest, ignores societies will, and threatens the freedom of people then he is no longer acting as a just ruler. The government should be made and should act as an extension of the populace and its goals, and similarly people should have a role…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Classical liberalist such as John Stuart Mill explained that the government should attempt to help the welfare of its people. Mill saw the problem with government and realized the change he wanted to see. Mill explain that because government is now responsible for people, the majority of society could use government to deny liberty to the minority or those who opposing views. This is a beneficial ideology to society because it will promote welfare to help people overcome obstacles. It is human nature to naturally be evil and we must have government to maintain and regulate society, in order to prevent citizens from trumping others rights.…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Plato was strict in his views regarding democracy, as he appears to strongly advise that those who are not educated enough on a political level should not be granted the right to have a say on any issues affecting the state, he believes that society would make poor decisions and that political issues should only be addressed by those who are politically informed, such as philosophers like himself, as he believes they have the knowledge and wisdom to do so. However, J.S Mill is more lenient compared to Plato. As a liberalist, he believed in democracy and allowing the people to have a say on issues which will affect them and their society, he believed that democracy allowed freedom of speech to the people. Which highlights the difference between the two of their views…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His main point is that the politician needs to harmonize an “Ethic of Moral Conviction,” with an “Ethic of Responsibility.” The Ethic of Moral Conviction refers to the inflexible convictions and beliefs that a politician must hold. The Ethic of Responsibility refers to the everyday need to adopt means of the state’s violence in a fashion which preserves the peace for the greater good. A politician, Weber writes, must make compromises between these two ethics. This explains why at the end of this essay Weber writes "Politics is made with the head, not with the other parts of body, nor the soul". This is a task, that he believes not all humans can undertake.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli believed The Prince should not be just feared, but also loved. However, Machiavelli admits that fear works best for law and order, which is the case here. Hobbes says that a truly free person is one who goes along with the sovereign. However, Hobbes believed that all subjects of a government had the right to overthrow a government that no longer supported them. Hobbes wrote his “Laws of Nature”, which were his recommendations for guidelines for society.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “[T]he severity of penalties is only a vain resource, invented by little minds to substitute terror for that respect which they have no means of obtaining” . Thus, according to Rousseau the government should make the laws match the general will of the people additionally instead of using punishment and terror the government should try to prevent it in the first place and “establish the reign of virtue” , which will contribute to the prevention of crimes in the state. The term “morality” has a huge importance within the limits of the state and especially the civil state that is conducted upon the social contract. In order to reach mortality citizens need to become virtuous and come together for the common good and the general will of the state. When Citizens understand the significance of laws to their common good, they will start to respect them and act accordingly to their duties.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A society with laws and moral codes can be instituted from a state of nature because Hobbes believed a society is formed is due to fear and the desire for security. Laws and moral codes must be backed up by force because a society works best when people work together rather than trying to gain individual dominance over another. Since society is like a “social contract”, it is believed that punishment is necessary otherwise people would break the rules every time it was in their interest to do so. Absolute sovereignty is the ideal government because, according to Hobbes, is most able to keep the peace. Civil power is used to force everyone to follow what they have agreed to in terms of the “social contract” to protect us from ourselves.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli speaks to this conflict of virtuous behavior versus deception when he says, “If a prince wants to maintain his rule he must be prepared not to be virtuous” (50). Without morals, the only guiding force that remains is a conscious action motivated by one’s own rational thought. Once one gives up his morals, he rids himself of the pressure that is associated with being a virtuous person. However, Machiavelli does not entirely preach the notion that – in order to be a successful leader – one must abandon all forms of virtuous behavior. If morality is defined as a demarcation between good and evil, then there must be something to say about the importance of valuing the goodness of one’s nation over its destruction.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Contract In order to govern a society, the established government needs a certain amount of control and power over the citizens. Mitchell defines this social contract as, “social contract an agreement among citizens or between the ruler and the ruled that defines the rights and duties of each party.” Locke views humans as benign in nature, who would passively live out their lives without interfering with their neighbors. Hobbes believes that humans are innately aggressive and must be controlled and regulated by a powerful central entity to ensure everyone coexists and lives peacefully. They both agree that social contracts are necessary, but vary their reasoning’s on why. We agree to become party of a society, and contribute to ensure the success of that society.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato's Theory Of Power

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout history, organized human society has found it necessary to create governments: institutions capable of directing the productive powers of society towards the common good, protect the community from internal and external threats, ensure that the individuals who comprises the society receives the best possible environment in which to proliferate and curb the destructive and damaging presence of man from harming himself. The lack of an organized institution to manage the people will invariably result in disorder and chaos. Therefore, we will consider three different political philosophies and their attempt to create a stable form of government for humanity. Plato’s aristocracy was created in the context of his beliefs of humans being…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays