Thoreau And Machiavelli Comparison

Superior Essays
The world is an extremely complicated place, with issues constantly coming to the forefront, and it is imperative for society to address them. However, the answer is not always easy, and many theorists disagree with each other. This holds especially true for the philosophers Machiavelli and Thoreau. Machiavelli advocated a strong central government that protects its people with an undefeated army, even at the expense of giving up liberties. Contrarily, Thoreau emphasized justice, freedom, and empowerment of the individual. It is clear that Thoreau would disagree with Machiavelli's ideologies as they clash with his own. Machiavelli sought a powerful government whose primary goals are protection and honor, even if it meant robbing civil liberties. Machiavelli thought this way because of his assumption that people are generally not good. In The Prince, he states that, "[people] are ungrateful, fickle, simulators and deceivers, avoiders of danger, [and] greedy for gain" (46). He thought that if left to their own accords, people would be up to no good, and thus need a government to watch over their actions. In his work, Machiavelli repeated values that he sought in a society, values, which he thought people could not embrace without a heavy-handed government. These values included faith, integrity, strength, and honor, among others. Due to …show more content…
Their views supporting either fascism or anarchy are so radically different.
Machiavelli supports the government to control people, unite them, make them feel a certain way, and accomplish tasks together. Thoreau seeks a government that takes a step back, enabling expression of the individual and unregulated innovation. The only idea that these two men would agree with each other on is that there are problems in the world that need to be addressed. Today there are more moderate approaches to dealing with the world's

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    It is impossible for people to see the benefits if they do not know the basic precepts of the ideology. America has been molded to believe that socialism is about total control. In reality, it aims to help the working man. However, ideological hegemony is to blame for the war on socialism. Ideological hegemony is a dangerous process whereby the dominant ideology is ingrained in the public through the media, schools, churches, and other agents (Neumann 1).This leads to misinformed citizens.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Vonnegut wants to differentiate between what society created and what nature intended. He allows for the reader to see how the government interferes with every aspect of life by showing one of the most important aspects of being a cognitive person. By taking away the ability to remember or feel, Vonnegut takes away the meaning of existence. He is commenting on how the government in this society would rather have stupid, uncaring, unfeeling people than a productive people who can think and feel. He presents the government as something that is afraid of being contradicted and will therefore go to any lengths to stop the people from thinking; Vonnegut allows…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Similarly to having a reputation of stinginess in order to preserve self-image, Machiavelli argues that a ruler must also possess fear from his subjects, as opposed to love. He attributes disloyalty in formerly-devoted subjects to the simple, selfish nature of men, and therefore he argues that fear preserves a prince…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should a leader always be truthful to his people? Machiavelli states, “a wise ruler, cannot and should not keep his word when such an observance of faith would be at a disadvantage” (230). He believes that if a leader were to lie, there would be no consequences since all truth only gives the person in power a disadvantage. It may sound like an unethical idea because this goes against everything a virtuous person does, but there is some truth of what Machiavelli is saying. Leaders deceive their subjects because all men break their promises according to Machiavelli.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Machiavelli hence suggests that it is in the ruler’s best interest to set aside previous beliefs about politics and look at the truth. Through the process of seeking truth, Machiavelli is extremely aware of mankind's shortcomings (Prince, ch.17). Being aware of these failures enables him to see that in order to live a safe life one must embrace these flaws. Thus if someone acts in a “rotten” manner he will likely be feared rather than loved (Prince, ch.17). While being feared might seem unnecessary to some, Machiavelli goes on to note that being loved is a much more dangerous way of life because, love, is held by men who are “wicked”.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the written work “The Prince” by Niccolo Machiavelli the author elaborates on how a prince can only be a strong leader if he engages in duplicity. Machiavelli focused on a more realistic and immoral strategy to keep the people of his time unified, realpolitik a system based on practical rather than moral considerations. The author, Niccolo Machiavelli, goes through great depths to explain why it takes rulers who are “cruel, dishonest, duplicitous, and manipulative.” There are many great examples to prove his ideology, however, the writing is very subjective and bias as Machiavelli does not give a rebuttal to the different kinds of ruling. He writes “The Prince” after the current leading family of his time falls in order to keep the stability…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, being different is seen as something abnormal, which usually isolates the individual forcing the person to comply to public’s opinion. Thoreau criticizes society because as a whole, it robs people of their consciousness and how they wish to be view. He states, “a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice,” this means that what the majority thinks is usually not right because it is true but because as the majority in society they hold higher power, therefore, their words are consider as fact. Hence, when a person blindly follows what it is said, without questioning, he becomes a slave of the nation. Thoreau complains about people’s blind faith in their government and tries to tell them that being individualistic is alright and it’s something we should strive to achieve.…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However he was stubborn and proud, and lacked the virtù to make others respect him or fear him enough to avoid the threat of physical violence. He decried the Patriots as an extremist group, who despite several valid points, were heading down a suicidal path. This fear of self-destruction is what drove most of Mr. Delaney’s actions against the Patriots. Due to his unwillingness to bend, Mr. Delancey failed to master Lady Fortuna, and he paid with his life. Mr. Delancey could not imagine an independent America and sought to return to life under Britain’s rule as a cooperative colony.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If he must choose one quality, M claims that the prince is better to be feared than loved, due to people’s human nature. Human nature, according to M, is unpredictable, selfish, and fearful; in other words, in times of danger, people will most likely to flee from danger and abandon their ruler. If the prince is loved, people, who do not have strong loyalty towards the prince, will turn their backs; however, if the prince is feared, loyal citizens will attempt to fight against the vicissitudes and protect their country and the prince. 6. In Chapter 18 Machiavelli discusses the need for a prince to have two natures: a fox and a lion.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People are keen to overreact and exaggerate “every little mismanagement in public affairs” when it is their liberty on the line (376). Never before had the people been given so much power over a legislature or ruler, and this power would surely corrupt the populace with a thirst for vengeance. The people would call for revolution after revolution, because the power that Locke provides vests them with the final protection of their rights and…

    • 2225 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays