Machiaveli Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
According to Machiavelli in The Prince, “when they (leader) can rely on themselves and use force, then they are rarely endangered. Hence it is that all armed prophets have conquered, and the unarmed ones have been destroyed.” (The Prince, p.64) Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for President of the United States, arguably the most significant office position in the World, is using both the literally and metaphorical force of his supporters to increase his chance of winning the election. A current nationwide issue of major significance throughout the Republic Party during this election year is the protection of the Second Constitutional Amendment, the right to bear arms. In a simplistic explanation, Republicans for the most part support the Second Amendment while Democrats fail to see its necessity in current times. Due to this split, it is the supports of Trump who possess weapons for the most part so if there was hypothetically to be a second Civil War or a large enough divide within the country, Trump would be able to rise to power with his armed supporters, which, in accordance with Machiavelli, would increase Trump’s probability of success. A leader who does not have a forceful presence is unable to remain in power.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment- The second amendment has been at times the cornerstone of political controversies or arguments throughout the decades due to what many would construe as an open ended interpretation by the founding fathers on the right of an American to own a firearm. The first and in many cases major line of ‘defense’ (no pun intended) for gun advocates, stating the original ideology of the founding fathers and those who founded this nation was a nation based on the freedom to bear arms for ones self interests. The amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” , and many feel as though the key words are ‘shall not be…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saul Cornell’s book titled “A Well Regulated Militia” explains the right of a citizen to bear arm. An important law made for the protection of rights for citizens of the United State is the second Amendment. The second amendment allowed people to maintain the security of their families, and properties. Citizens can also arm themselves in other to be part of a militia which is well regulated.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 2nd Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. Many Americans believe in and benefit from this right, however, the freedom to bear arms at times may come with significant and sometimes deadly consequences. The right to bear arms is a relatively easy process. Americans are victims to innocent deaths such as murders and accidental shootings due to the ease at which one can own a gun.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bear Arms Dbq

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Due to the human nature of self-defense, sport, and surviving, the second amendment will always remain relevant in society. Although there are many regulations as to who can own a gun, where they are allowed, and requiring a permit to carry and concealed weapon, the second amendment still protects and grants the right of the militia and citizens to “keep and bear arms”. In order to ensure that the government couldn’t take away the citizens firearms, the founding fathers preserved their right to self-defense with the ratification of the second amendment on December 15, 1791. In today's society, Americans are still trying to defend their right to bear arms.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The root of the debate is to whether or not the Second Constitutional Amendment is meant to protect an individual’s right to bear arms. The real question is do American citizens have the right to bear arms? If they bear this right then to what extent and what kind should be allowed. With the advancements in weaponry in modern times American citizens should have the right to certain arms for their own protection, but not the right to all weapons available. While the legality of ownership has been upheld this far for citizens in the United States the technology of weaponry has certainly changed.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first reason why the second amendment is important is because we are an uncommon nation, to have the right to own arms so why change it. Alexander Hamilton, Founding Father, said “The Constitution shall never be constructed… to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arm”. That means that the constitution will never be built to stop peaceable citizens from owning guns. I think he meant as long as we are peaceable citizens, we shall have the right to own guns and if…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Persuasive Gun Control

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As this year’s disturbing presidential race unfolds, one of the issues that has been brought up—the cause of multiple deaths of civilians and police officers—is that of gun possession. The Democratic, pseudo-progressive view is pro-gun control, while the Trumpian view supports deregulation and is aligned with the views of the NRA. Both sides invoke academic studies to support in their respective attempts to support and promote their views. There are several, contradicting, studies on the issue. According to The Washington Post, “The United States has the highest gun ownership rate in the world and the highest per capita rate of firearm-related murders of all developed countries.”…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In discussions of the Second Amendment, one controversial issue has been whether the Founding Fathers considered the future use of guns. On the one hand, the federal government argues for stricter regulations towards people who bear arms. On the contrary, the people of the state contend that our rights shall not be infringed. With respect to both parties, stricter gun laws are needed to protect American’s from massacres. Guns were created for one purpose and one purpose only, to kill.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As American citizens, everyone is entitled to certain rights that the government is not supposed to infringe upon. However, the Second Amendment is a right that some political figures are working on taking away. Some Americans believe that this amendment should be repealed from the constitution, while many others know that it is a natural born right of a citizen. Doing research on this topic, it is very clear that not everyone in the government is trying to take away this right, but some political figures are in fact attempting to take away the Second Amendment Right to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment is stated as “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Legislative Action (NRA)

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Even those who support all basic civil liberties are crucial to appeal to because they agree with the Republican Party’s support of the civil liberty to own a gun. It can be argued that the Republican Party should relax its relationship with the NRA and support some more gun control laws but by doing that, the party would lose so much more than it would gain. Protecting the Second Amendment has been and remains a fundamental difference between the major US political parties. The strength and support of the NRA as an advocate in protected the right of all Americans to keep and bear arms results in alignment between the interest of the NRA and conservative Republicans.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The day begins just like any other in a quiet, small town, when out of nowhere a suspicious man enters the local bank and confidently states that this is a holdup. All of the innocent bystanders inside the bank are physically incapacitated initially out of fear as the bank robber brandishes his intimidating firearm while giving directions to the civilians not to move or speak unless exclusively instructed to do so at his command. The man also warns them not to try anything sneaky or else he will be compelled to do something crazy. The suspect makes his way to the bank tellers at which point he aggressively grabs one of the employees by the shirt and demands they empty the vaults and hand over the funds to him. Meanwhile, one of the hostages…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On December 15, 1791, the first ten amendments contained in the Bill of Rights was passed. One of which was the second amendment and protects the right to bear arms. The amendment specifically states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". While this was pretty cut and dry for the time period in which it was passed. It has become a murky and grey topic as of present.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control and the Second Amendment According to Schulman (1991), the text of the Second Amendment of the US Constitutions reads as follows: “a correctly structured militia, for purposes of state security; the right of the citizens to have and to carry arms shall not be challenged.” This is a paraphrased version of what is contained in the original constitutional document. Nonetheless, it captures the spirit of the constitution regarding the issue of guns and their possession thereof.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The culture and laws of a country are heavily influenced by its history. The United States of America was born out of violence. On July 4th 1776, a group of well-respected Americans signed The Declaration of Independence, officially announcing America’s separation from Great Brittan and initiating the Revolutionary War. Once America emerged as victors of the war in 1783, in order to protect the civil rights of American citizens, laws were created by members of legislature. Today, one of the most controversial laws can be found under the second amendment of the Bill of Rights.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays