Macalia And Thomas Scalia Case Study

Decent Essays
Justices Scalia and Thomas. Scalia stated that “We have no power to decide this case. And even if we did, we have no power under the Constitution to invalidate the democratically adopted legislation.” Additionally, Scalia believed that the Supreme Court did not have the jurisdiction to review and decide the case. Both Justices believed that this case was about power. People having the power to govern themselves and the court having the power to pronounce the law. Scalia believed that the majority opinion described non-supporters of same-sex marriage as "enemies of the human

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Dissenting opinions: Justice Scalia, Ginsburg, and the Chief Justice join in dissenting, “the court points to no textual basis for that conclusion other than the notoriously malleable word "willfully" itself. Instead, it seems to fall back on a presumption that even where ignorance of the law is an excuse, that excuse should be construed as narrowly as the statutory language permits.” Justice Scalia talks more about not basing the court case on just presumptions but more on legal context, which leads his argument in dissenting. IX. Vote tally: 6 -…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court case United States v. Windsor, problems provoked regarding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The DOMA was a United States federal law that prohibited homosexual marriage while defining a marriage as a relationship between a male and a female. This act was soon ruled unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the 5th amendment. Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer were happily married in Ontario, Canada (2007) until Thea Spyer died in 2009, leaving behind all their property for Edith. Similarly to what usually happens after a spouse dies, Windsor believed that she would be able to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses; however, since Windsor and Spyer had a homosexual marriage, Windsor was not considered Spyer’s…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court had the right to review acts of Congress and the actions of the President. If a law was found unconstitutional, the court could overrule it. Marshall wrote, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” He argued the constitution is the Supreme law of the land and it has the final say over the meaning of the…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that these two justices’ jurisprudence, or philosophy of law, is shaped by their political ideologies. This is not to say, however, that I believe that the two justices’ political ideologies affect their ability to come to objective decisions since ultimately, their most important task is to remain impartial. The two SCOTUS justices are on the opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. In addition to their opposite ideologies, the pair has two completely different philosophies of law and therefore, vary in their methods of interpretation. Justice Breyer’s political alignment is more towards the liberal side of the court.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell vs Hodges June 26, 2015. The United States Supreme Court finalized the case known as Obergefell vs Hodges. The case involved a decades long battle between states and people on weather or not gay marriage should be legalized. Same-sex couples, and other advocates of same-sex marriage sued their state marriage agencies in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee on weather or not their right to refuse same-sex marriage was violating the 14th Amendment, which addresses many parts of the right of US Citizens. [ Obergefell v. Hodges.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving v. Virginia was a case in 1967 about invalidating laws prohibiting interracial marriage. The case was argued in April of 1967 and decided later in June. Mildred Jeter, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, lived in Caroline County, Virginia. Since there was a state law prohibiting interracial marriage in Virginia, they got married in Washington DC in 1958. This anti-miscegenation law was called “Racial Integrity Act of 1924”.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Supreme Court justice argue in valid points. The world is changing and so does technology and the views of citizens. While making decision justice(s) must think about when was constitution written and how the world have change since then, if not it would be like watching black and white television today. So I support the Justice Breyer approach and court must be guided by the views of the citizens. Just a caution note I’m not trying to say we must ignore the constitution and do what we like…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Obergefell v. Hodges case lasted around 6 years. The petitioner was James Obergefell, et al. and Richard Hodges, Director of the Ohio Department of Health, et al. This case took place in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. The deciding court was Roberts Court in the years of 2010 and 2016.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been several times within American politics where the rights of groups of people have been fought over. These types of fights have been spread over the course of America’s history the most well known being the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. One of the most recent of these fights was the repeal of California’s Proposition 8, originally titled the “California Marriage Protection Act,” which only affected same-sex couples. Proposition 8 was a proposal for an amendment addition to the California constitution stating “only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California,” creating controversy between groups. The California Supreme Court saw that “limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples,” was violating…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On April 13, 1743, the author of the declaration of independence and third president of the US was born in Shadwell plantation, West Virginia. This famous historical figure is Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson’s mother was Jane Randolph Jefferson. She came from a prominent background and lived in London until her sister, Mary was born, moving to Virginia in 1725. She married Peter Jefferson on October 3, 1739, in Goochland County.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Loving V. Virginia In 1953, twenty-three year Richard Loving (white) and seventeen year old Mildred Jeter (black), who lived in Virginia at the time, went to the District of Columbia to get married to avoid violating Virginia’s anti-miscegenation, or interracial marriage, laws. When they moved back to Virginia, a grand jury of the Caroline County Circuit Court in October of 1958 issued a charge against the Lovings for breaking anti-miscegenation statutes in the Virginia law code. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge and were sentenced to one year in prison, but the judge suspended their rule on one condition: that they stayed out of the state of Virginia for twenty five years. The judge in the case, Leon M. Bazile,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Restraint Essay

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As we know about the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices, coming from varied religious and ethnic backgrounds with six males and three females. Presidents nominate Justices for life tenure and they must be confirmed by majority vote of the Senate. According to NY Times article that has the title” Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide”, on June 27th, the US Supreme Court decided 5-4 that same-sex couples have a ‘fundamental’ right to marry, and thus overturned the laws of at least 17 states. In this assignment, I will discuss the arguments both for and against judicial activism vs. judicial restraint, using the 2015 gay marriage case of OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Religion could be found in every corner of the world. It dictates what we eat, how we look, what we do or don’t do, and the morals we believe. For a lot of us religion is a big part of our lives and this could be seen in our government. Since the birth of the United States, religion has played a big part in our society, lawmaking, and culture. The U.S is a Christian based country and its morals have dictated a lot of laws.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26, 2015, LBGT+ activist groups rejoiced as the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage believing that a ban of it violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution. This didn’t help stop any hatred of same-sex couples and it seemed that the world would implode due to the court’s decision However, backlash soon followed, leading to an Appeals court, saying it didn’t violate the 14th amendment and many “Christian” groups saying the ruling by the Supreme Court goes against the bible. In the case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, the ruling has influenced the United States to take steps in a more progressive future where everyone has equal rights and helping America begin its transition into a more positive light with supporting this decision. Much of the backlash from this decision was due to these different “Christian” activist groups who said that same-sex marriage went against their religious liberties and violated the bible in Leviticus. Which is quite hilarious as none of them probably adhere to the teaching in the book of Leviticus like no eating shellfish and no mixing different materials to wear like a cotton, polyester blend…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Functions

    • 1065 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At the head of our federal court system stands the United States Supreme Court. Many present-day US citizens possess minimal knowledge regarding the Supreme Court and how it functions. The Supreme Court serves as the ultimate authority in legal interpretation and its verdicts can only be altered by a constitutional amendment. The Court is in charge of making authoritative decisions concerning many of the most important issues of our time. The Court reviews decisions made by lower courts and its rulings are declared final following a majority vote by the justices.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays