When we started with 40 M&M’s, it took 6 seconds to completely decay, and when we started with 30 M&M’s, it took 4 seconds to completely decay, but when we started with 20 M&M’s, it took 6 seconds to completely decay. When we started with 10 M&M’s, it took a mere 3 seconds to fully decay.The starting amount of M&Ms of 40 took longer to completely decay than it took for the M&Ms with a starting amount of 30 to completely decay, and the total amount of time it took for the initial mass of 30 M&Ms to completely decay was longer than the time it took for the initial mass of 10 M&Ms to completely decay. From this trend, I concluded that the larger the initial mass, the longer it would take for the initial mass to completely decay (not applicable in real life), even if the rate of decay is faster than the rate of decay of a smaller initial mass of M&Ms. This makes sense; however, when looking at the line with the initial mass of 20 M&Ms, the time it took to fully decay is
When we started with 40 M&M’s, it took 6 seconds to completely decay, and when we started with 30 M&M’s, it took 4 seconds to completely decay, but when we started with 20 M&M’s, it took 6 seconds to completely decay. When we started with 10 M&M’s, it took a mere 3 seconds to fully decay.The starting amount of M&Ms of 40 took longer to completely decay than it took for the M&Ms with a starting amount of 30 to completely decay, and the total amount of time it took for the initial mass of 30 M&Ms to completely decay was longer than the time it took for the initial mass of 10 M&Ms to completely decay. From this trend, I concluded that the larger the initial mass, the longer it would take for the initial mass to completely decay (not applicable in real life), even if the rate of decay is faster than the rate of decay of a smaller initial mass of M&Ms. This makes sense; however, when looking at the line with the initial mass of 20 M&Ms, the time it took to fully decay is